Member Info for Brombarb

Shaa
SH prices
https://www.asx.com.au/asx/share-price-research/company/88E
https://hotcopper.com.au/asx/88e/discussion/
https://www.chi-x.com.au/
F/X I use
https://www.xe.com/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=0.05&From=AUD&To=GBP

traffic events page with 4 days to go shows no change, last update 11/02
https://511.alaska.gov/list/events/traffic?start=0&length=25&order%5Bi%5D=1&order%5Bdir%5D=asc

last bulletin (ANN) validated by above
http://clients3.weblink.com.au/clients/_88energy/headline.aspx?headlineid=6968078

25 hours from Deadhorse MP414 to Mp386, then ~32 miles of ice road, facts as we know them much of the rest is just noise.

Erik Opstad, Nordic Calista & Cruz are experts in what they do, we do not need to second guess or query.

perhaps could be seen as a ad disappointing but that mid price last night did not reflect trading.

20.2M (0.28%)

0.025AUD = 0.0128844GBP
0.024AUD = 0.0123690GBP

ASX (close)
2.4¢ 4.35% +
Volume18.92M

Chi-X (close)
2.5¢ 8.70% +
Volume1.277M

due to the potential and possibly the involvement of PMO I just expect that a lot in the industry will be watching, will not mean they are necessarily interested in taking a piece of the action, but who knows!
best of luck all

21:31 properly you should halve the AIM volumes.
AIM reports the sells to the MM and then the buys from the MM
ASX just reports the trade (seller to buyer once).

"Yes, on ASX/CHI-X a buy does equal a sell.I might have read your email wrongly, but in your example of a 20M trade, that is a 20M transaction or parcel of shares changing hands i.e someone bought 20m shares from a seller who sold 20m shares,
only 20M goes into the totals for ASX/CHI-X that you publish daily ( not 40M.) A parcel of 20M changed hands. "
JumpinJack 30/10/19

19:41
volumes in Feb
ASX 132M
Chi-X 30M
AIM 266M
But remember that AIM double reports due to presence of MMs, so volumes down under are relatively better than they might first appear.
My view is that we need a heft kick.

why would you be worried you are out :-)

certainly PMO are not.

18:58 I had been waiting for those with the "realism" to come in and pull your post apart :-) Sure if Jiddy had made a similar prediction we would have seen blood.
Me I have no idea what is going to happen, mid price tonight does not really reflect actual trading prices, but the MMs must know what they are doing ...

unchanged since 11/02
https://511.alaska.gov/list/events/traffic?start=0&length=25&order%5Bi%5D=1&order%5Bdir%5D=asc

18:00 last RNS tells all validated with SOADOT511 traffic events

B1 you were saying you expected 1.5p by spud prior the CR, unless my maths is wrong that would take us ~2.4p by 1st March.
What has changed your mind or are you playing mind games :-))

think quite apt :-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Mwo9vw45n4

Challenges with Intrinsic Value
The trouble with calculating intrinsic value is it’s a very subjective exercise. There are so many assumptions that must be made, and the final net present value is very sensitive to changes in those assumptions.
Each of the assumptions in the WACC (beta, market risk premium) can be calculated in different ways, while the assumption around a confidence/probability factor is entirely subjective.
Essentially, when it comes to predicting the future, it is by definition, uncertain. For this reason, all of the most successful investors in the world can look at the same information about a company and arrive at totally different figures for its intrinsic value.
WDNKWWDNK

most other boards with a published 10% plus rise would be going bonkers now :-)

11:54
amazing - reason you need to take so much on here with a pinch of salt - ignorance, spin and on occasion absolute untruths abound,
Trust no one, if you can't validate then you can't be sure.
FAFH or is it Pbody filtered.

11:32 I looked at VRS which I think was at 18%, the issue was also that we are listed on ASX & chi-X which introduced timing issues even if Primary Bid could have worked over two markets- I don't know for sure.
The VRS was a very quick torn round based on a mid day price, no VWAP but if VRS could do no better than 18% ...
Ultimately as you say the discount will depend on how easy it is to get offer done.
After the previous under subscribed placement last year it is not hard to imagine that DW was not in the strongest of negotiating positions and a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

disappointed checked "live" ramping and even CTAG outdo us today by 2-0, we are not very good at it are we LOL

Erik Opstad and Nordic Calista/Cruz Construction are experts in what they do, will be no mis-timings or issues I am sure.

10:02 :-))

08:48 I seemed to recall he claimed a telephone conversation with DW also!

Hardly robbing the rich to feed the poor :-)