RE: I think22 Feb 2019 17:42
Just following on from Toro's comments (as I think he's in the right ball park). This is the important part of the RNS for me (not rocket science I know):
"specifically authorise the Directors to issue and allot up to a maximum of 15% of the Company's Issued Share Capital (at the time of the Meeting) to be used at the discretion of the Board as consideration to key suppliers for services rendered and/or capital expenditure (e.g. project-related equity) for the period through to the Company's next Annual General Meeting,"
So, this 15% equity headroom is to satisfy 'key' suppliers and/or meet capital expenditure between March and December. It's headroom. Some/ all/ none of it may be issued depending on budgetary requirements. It’s a comfort measure should it be required.
Don’t forget, you have a vote. Use it if you feel strongly but ensure you consider the alternatives before making your decision.
Also worth bearing in mind that the company will issue the equity at the prevailing share price, not at fixed prices as you would see a placing (as there’s no cash consideration being received). It is therefore in the company’s and shareholders best interests to see equity issued at a stronger share price, i.e,
We owe supplier x £100,000 for services rendered. Do we:
Allot them 500,000 shares @20p
Allot them 250,000 shares @40p
Etc etc.
Mike29 raises a fair point. The company came to market and got £5.4m in November and whilst they wanted a more substantial raise to meet the 2019 budget it was completely the wrong time. Personally £5.4m at 20p was enough as we all know the strategy here and for exploration companies with the right mindset in general - to raise as much cash for as much exploration for as little dilution as possible. This is why managerial skin in the game is important.
So who are the key suppliers? Geodrill (Ghana - https://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/market-news/market-news-detail/IRR/13622675.html), whoever is going to do the work in Chad.
Where have we seen drilling companies remunerated with stock before? “Incentivise them and they will look after you” feels like a comment I've heard fairly recently from a connected company.
Then, as Toro says, you can't discount that we'll pick up more licences or strike a joint venture over prospective tenements. If an area is showing the promise IRR are looking for then it's foolish to pass them up. This is about building a mid-tier developer at the end of the day, not about bloating the SP next week or next year for shareholder benefit.
As far as I’m concerned we're in that painful pocket where the SP doesn't show the progress made by the company, thus hamstringing it. There's plenty to look forward to:
Abonko results and further exploration results from Ewoyaa extensions.
Early plans for the next Cape Coast targets.
Chad updates - IP survey.
2019 is set up to be a transformational year for IronRidge and today’s announcement was aligning