Member Info for Bozi

You changed your tune quickly from last week Ssmith_trader

Still, if all you short termers are bullish we could be about to see a trade.

The goal will be to dump at the top and watch as the traders scarper to repeat the whole process all over again...

Both positions looking quite fine thanks.

You're the one digging someone out for their holding Raku when you can't hold yourself.

Cry more and take your beer money fool.

I don't think you're in a position to deride anybody Bakuraku given you flog your holding whenever it makes 10-20%...

Quady - I do try and back you up on certain matters SOLG but I don't think you can refute without question the possibility that Covid-19 originated in a Wuhan lab, nor can you prove that manipulation doesn't happen where institutional investors are concerned.

The onus may be on the other party but that doesn't stop you unequivocally proving your argument.

Rich3r - leave me out of this.

Besides, I don't think I ever said "production is coming". I said production will be the end goal and I want the company to get as far as possible if that means a better return for us all.

The only difference between me and a few of you is I don't come on this board every day, crowing for an RNS or a takeover bid. I'm a patient and realistic investor.

Not sure we're quite there yet Aimtodeath. Think and expect it to feed into DFS.

That's the long and the short of it Addicknt.

Zoros - I see you're well entwined in the tired old Mather narrative.

You lot are pretty funny. When it suits it's a case of Mather losing the respect of his senior shareholders but then when the mask slips we see it conceded that Mather was never going to be able to steer the ship past a certain point once NCM and BHP came aboard.

Which is it? You can't have it both ways.

I'd love this stock to be inpunged for another 20 years. We'd maybe get to production by then and you would lose your **** in the process.

Quite how you can underestimate and overachieve by providing a 10mt+ 22m-oz AU +90m-oz AG resource in the last 5 years and an average share price appreciation of 2200% over the same timeframe is beyond me. What do you expect of Mather? That he moves worlds?

Based on your SolGold analysis i trust you know very little about GGP. You know very little about the stock market in general, whereas I can testify many years of working experience. I know a thing or two about GGP and would be happy to hear your advice for it's comedy value.

Redknight1 -bravo on the cheerleading. I can count without any fingers how many of my points you have countered today...

Smickster - it's a strange one. In one sense i can see what Red is saying. The company has now had to postpone the Alpala PFS release for a second time and that erodes investor confidence and combined with a sterile market we find ourselves trading our lows.

But i certainly don't appreciate the crusade against the board. I understand it (anything to weaken Nick's position to expedite a change of control fight) but i think it's a poor show in all honesty.

I'm a person at values loyalty. Mather created this company and was at the forefront of it moving to Ecuador through Malcolm Norris. Until he does something that is directly detrimental for me he has my support. Same goes for Moller and Twigger by extension.

Appreciate I'm the minority though and well used to it.

Redknight1 - do you realistically expect the market cap to have continued sailing north from that level you highlighted in 2017/2018?

That isn't how these plays work. It doesn't matter whether it's SolGold or someone else.

You've seen the growth curve/trajectory during the development cycle I take it? Yes, that graph that shoots north on discovery and then settles back lower during feasibility and construction.

So what is happening isn't value destruction by the SOLG board at all.

Just look at, dare I say it, Greatland Gold. Huge discovery spike whilst the resource results come flying in. Those guys think they know what they have and I'm pretty sure they're happy enough with how the company is managed but it doesn't mean the company isn't 60%+ off its high?

You can relax I'm sure. I think we all know which way the AGM director voting is going to go. People are probably going to be out of a job and you can turn your attentions towards a quick spike towards a trade facilitating event.

Yep Z. I'd vote to get rid of your funny timelines first.

Setting your alarm for the premium bonds prize draw is more your cuppa I'd say.

Can't you tell SeanHunter is back for a trade.

True visionary.

On what basis Addicknt?

If this team can't produce a robust PFS for Cascabel, what gives you the impression somebody else will?

After all we are dealing with the same resource, the same assumptions and the same third party consultants.

Further, what gives you the impression another team will be able to work better with BHP/NCM and deliver at least the return that the current one will?

It hasn't passed me by that no team may be able to give me the return that I want. That's a very realistic possibility, but I'm also struggling to appreciate what new directors will do that this lot aren't.

Addicknt - I'm simply challenging the notion that exists that by denying re-election of our current board members that we are giving ourselves the best opportunity for an improvement in company share price performance.

As someone who understands the dynamic of a major miner wading into a significant discovery made by a fledgling junior surely you can see the angle I'm coming from?

Addicknt - do not disagree with the first half of your post.

As for the second half, of course I'm a participant for the financial betterment of myself, my family etc but the stark difference remains that I'm not hell bent on seeing a return quickly if it is to the detriment of a better return down the line. That's all I'm getting at. I don't see why it gets dragged out of context. I haven't hidden this view at all.

We are TheSlug and I get that, and respect it even if it comes across to the contrary sometimes.

I'm just of the view that our major shareholders have set this up to a tee over the last 4 or 5 years and as less powerful investors, we need to remember than it's not always about 'Moller being politically aligned with Nick' or 'Twigger firing cheap shots' as RK1 put it earlier.

There's always more than meets the eye than that which we have deduced through our own speculation and investigation and it boils down to one question...

Do I think this management team is sub par or useless?

The answer is a resounding no. A much smaller management team consisting of some of these heads discovered and delineated Alpala and have grabbed more ground to repeat the trick, laying the foundations for a very large junior explorer.

That management team has then been bolstered with good experienced people.

So, in my view, this management team looks worse than it is due to defensive actions it is having to take. They'll be fully aware the optics are shocking I suspect.

Correct Smickster.

This is unfortunately going for a song and the voting intentions of SOLG shareholders in a fortnight's time will be the skier at the top of the mountain run.

2022 will see he/her slalom their way down at speed.

The Slug - thought you were more nuanced than that I have to say.

Personally, my mo is to give the company the best opportunity to succeed. If it happens within the timeframe I need it, great.

I won't make decisions that harms the company just because I'd like a quick trade. I mean if the opportunity arises during the normal course of events then absolutely fantastic, but if not....

I'm aware of Olympic Dam, CD.

I think it's fairer to say that Mather's skill sets and Cazzubbo's are in different areas. Cazzubbo clearly leads in the project development and management stakes.