Member Info for bon_scott

"Maybe lse should put a posting limit per day on users for their own sanity. "

Fully agreed. You're easily the most prolific (and toxic) poster on this board. Absolutely desperate.

No need to worry about extending part of the RCF, which won't be needed anyway. Revenue is sure to boom because of all these returns.

Oh, look, the deletey posty fairy is doing his/her thing once more. I wonder who it could be...

"Btw, what kind of neanderthal talks about "birds", it just cringeworrhy although no surprise I guess"

No surprise at you claiming the moral high ground, Tradey.

No, let's not get distracted, coasty. Pay attention, dear.

You're deflecting with some drivel about the charge for returns (which barely recoups the shipping cost, both ways). You said the returns themselves generate revenue. The goods. Which they don't.

I'm sorry that you aren't able to articulate yourself properly. Should have stuck in at school.

Ummmmm... sneaky how you're pivoting to the returns charge. Goalpost shifting yet again. You clearly stated that the returns themselves generate revenue.

Here it is, for all to see:

"figures generated by returns."

"Spidy remind us how much revenue the returns generate now?"

Boohoo has provisioned a substantial amount (i.e. prepared itself to take a financial hit/loss) for returns, to be charged to the income statement.

"Not enough to offset the costs"

Yes, exactly, oh wise one. Might take the edge off the losses, but I certainly do not consider it a revenue generator.

Zero hoots given if anyone agrees or not.

"Spidy remind us how much revenue the returns generate now?"

Since when did returned goods generate revenue for a company? Dear me...

Good find, mystic1076, thank-you for sharing.

Having read the article, it is clear that the individual brands are all working hard to trim their operations and many are making headway in arresting losses. It at least gives me some sense that there could be a meaningful turnaround before it is too late. In all, I take the article as being positive.

What baffles me though, is why the group management can't manage to report on time, and why they aren't moving heaven and earth to emphasise the positives, such as the profitable brands, those with increasing revenue, and those with decreasing losses. You know... the kind of good press which inspires confidence in business prospects.

"Who would have ever believed Microsoft would go from 100 dollars to 400..... "

Microsoft actually had a vision, a strategy and the managerial talent to implement it. Worst comparison ever.

The board has proven that the company has an almost limitless capacity for ineptitude, instability, value destruction and scandal. The company doesn't make any money. Gross margin is positive, but the board turns a positive into a massive negative with squandered capital investments.

"Hahahahahahah. Circus has arrived. "

100p by Christmas?

"the guidance was cr@p - yeah we know…..and? we know why the guidance is cr@p too. but we know it remains cr@p and not utter **** lile some would lead you to believe"

Because you tried the sleight of hand trick, in implying that being in line with guidance is somehow considered alright.

"At least it puts to bed all the “it must be bad if they wont provide an update” naysayers - we all knew that no update meant it was inline with previous guidance, and now its confirmed. "

And if you recall, the guidance itself was pony.

"no more major wars have broken out."

...despite coasty's best efforts...

Elliott Wave. The financial equivalent of seeing Jesus in the toast.

Here's a more reliable indicator of whether a stock will go up or down: whether it makes any money, and whether it is predicted to make some money. As much as it pains me, it'a big fat no to both for Boohoo.

Give it a rest coasty. A near-permanent embarrassment.

"Another rabbit hole?"

Exactly, Hexam. Coasty grasps at anything - literally anything - to try to score cheap points. What a tool.

Morning Bob77,

"Any insight on if/when we might get a TA, was 19th Jan last year."

Well... the reality is that the company can't be bothered to update the market about how badly things are going. To update the market would imply that they're actually bothered about communicating responsibily.So, this year, aren't going to release anything. A kooky lifestyle company without a strategy, lurching from crisis to crisis.