Member Info for bon_scott

"And as usual the trolls report posts in the background so my comment on the new super hero is removed, so thanks for reiterating."

I wish the reporters of posts could be known, actually. You, Trading4good, would stand out like a sore thumb as the most obssessive reporter of the lot. Any post whatsoever which does not fit your view mysteriously disappears.

"Certainly got the measure of this quickly enough. "

Blazingly obvious, Daytradenovice. Total denial by so many, that we're in a years long retail rinseathon. Explanations and justifications from some on here border on the desperate.

"Onto the second cuppa now in anticipation of a good BOO day here,, lovely."

Absolutely right, Daytradenovice. At least 100p nailed on, all backed up by the board experts. Definitely wouldn't want to be out of this over the weekend.

exactly, daytradenovice, nothing like a dose of reality, ableit three years later than it occurred to many normal folk.

i do wish for the share price to improve, but as the days turn into months, and into years, i see abo****ely nothing - zilch - to suggest that it will. any rises just appear to be a twitching of the corpse.

Big Mike loading up all week, that's obviously why the share price is being held back.

No evidence of this, by the way. But anyone who dares the prevailing wisdom is clearly a fud-moron shorter.

So, with UK inflation due to return to about the 2% level, that'll blow another hole in the great list of go-to pumper excuses for Boohoo share price underperformance. Ever fewer places for the conmen to retreat to.

"We have most of the revolving cash facility left as per the last update and also £91m or so of uncumbered assets to call upon.

Good business if we could pick it up somewhere in the region of £50m"

Propping up and absorbing failing brands, all through funds that Boohoo don't have, and doing it all on the never-never...

Isn't that the exact same mistake that they Boohoo been making for several years? That and the random DC/warehouse/factory open/close folly which also squanders tens of millions at a time? Turning an operating profit into a statutory loss, year upon year.

Can anyone see a link between this recklessness and the current share price predicament? Anyone?

How about first focussing on manufacturing desirable, quality products at competitive prices, and exercising good control of busines finances by being cash positive, and producing an overall year-end accounting profit?

Interesting article, showing the degree to which Shein undercut H&M and Zara on item costs. Boohoo's costs not mentioned in the article, nor in the McKinsey report cited. It would have been better to have had online-to-onnline business comparisons. Summary: Shein aren't just going away. Really.

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/investing/article-13202737/Shein-disrupting-fashion-world-effect-stock-market.html

Counting on an aborted IPO from legislative tightening (human rights or financial or similar) is likely to result in disappointment. Because of 1) the ruin done to the City in recent years, and 2) pro-Chinese views and outright blindness/weakness from some of our most senior politicans with active wooing and campaigning on their behalf, I believe that a Shein listing will be welcomed. For those who don't like what the article says, it can always be dismissed as "propaganda from a failing rag, desperate to boost its flagging readership", until Shein list for real.

Agreed, Reardon95. The trading update ahead is pivotal. The company simply must show some progress in returning to profitability.

"Its not upto me, or anybody else, to moderate my views/opinions to fall in line with what you want as you insist, its upto YOU to filter the several posters you have named you dont want to see for yourself , the same as anybody else. "

Exactly, Daytradenovice. Just a ploy, trying to make people censor themselves. Plain as day.

"Then the solution is the same for all who you claim to speak for then, surely?

The filter feature is there for everybody, i have one (remaining nameless) clown in there myself.

Put in there who you want and be happy."

I've just done a bit of reverse psychology and filtered west6809, so I don't have to endure the endless excuses about not using the feature.

"I repeat, if you dont wish to read a particular posters views and opinions, and its clear you dont which is your choice to make but not dictate, then there is a filter feature there for your use.

Please avail yourself of and use it, you will then never need to see the posters views/opinions whom you dont wish too.

Its not just there for window decoration."

But they won't. Strange, that...

"My post was in reference to trolls who post day and night, day in and day out. "

I wouldn't take it to heart. Just filter.

"Bon Scott it was you who posted that the list had been discontinued!"

OK Tradey, so the list lives on. Whoopdeedoo. All the same, people still remember you as regularly occupying the top 2-3 posters by volume, on account of your near-permanent pumping and belittling of others.

Buffaloben, from what I saw (at least before I popped out), the thread was mainly an embarrassing takedown of Tradey 1 & 3, i.e. Spunk and Bfd. If looking for the user who got most of that thread wiped out, Tradey (all three of them) would be my prime suspect.

Lifeless... Mahmud is chucking his cash at other investments rather than this turkey. Even Big Mike The Lord And Saviour seems to have lost interest. Coasty, I hope all these returned clothes start generating some serious profits soon, as you've so confidently claimed.

"Daytrade I'm intrigued, is there a "top five" list by volume on here. I'd be interested to see the link.

All I've ever seen is a "most recommended", which for a brief period I was #1 on. "

Tradey, you know fine well that you were consistently high on the list of prolific posters by volume, on account of your persistent pumping of this stock and non-stop vitriol toward others. Shame they discontinued the list. Maybe your thirteen thousand mostly abusive posts in three years had something to do with it. If you take that as a badge of honour, that speaks volumes.

"You knob bone head"

Loving your profanity-double-noun combo. Full marks for creativity.

"the minimum double digit below 77p is at most 69.3p, simple maths. But of course I never gave a figure so it could be lots lower."

Of course it's lots and lots lower, honest guv! Wink wink! All that super day trading has already broken you even, no doubt.

"Only a fool would judge my investments by the Bb I may have posted on."

Yet that's precisely what you do to others. Hypocrite of the highest order.

Tradey / Bfdinvestor, you fail to mention that you yourself were past thirteen thousand (mostly abusive) posts when you were banned by LSE. Please add your previous hi-score to your current 1,017 posts of tripe before throwing shade on others.

You're definitely on to something, Daytradenovice. Who on earth tries to obscure their breakeven price like that? I ignored it the first time he posted that, but he's obviously at great pains to broadcast his investing brilliance while also disguising that he's locked in at "only" 70p.

Claims not to wish to gloat, but goes on to gloat anyhow. Abusive, evasive, and a bit insecure too.