Member Info for bon_scott

Bravo, Spidey. Summed up beautifully.

Absolutely no sign of positivity from the company itself, just bizarre promises of future glories because "Big Mike", "UMAR!!!" and "Rolls Royce".

Coasty and his boss Tradey are outright conmen, with weak hangers-on like Spunk6999 and unclue_dog listening avidly to their every word.

Well isn't this just awesome. Tradey 2 and Tradey 3 agreeing with themselves (or himself) that Boohoo will roar back into to success because everyone will pull together and Shein will, er, just go away. Incredible analysis.

"And to think 'we dont like' repeated links on here, do we fanboys?"

According spunk6999, our beloved board bobby, the authorised link posting limit is two. Any more than that and he'll thcweam and thcweam until he ith thick. It's OK if coasty pastes the same tiresome guff dozens of times though. Favourites and all.

"business returning to profitability in FY 2026"

But, but, I thought rainbows and pots of gold were just around the corner? Is there an emoji for a bottom lip quivvering?

More and more people realising the blazingly obvious, which is that recovery ain't coming anytime soon. It has even dawned on Level5. So that'll have been a half-decade of irresponsibility, stagnation and lost opportunity.

Just shows: never, ever listen to the total nonsense that tradey and his concubine coasty. And it is nonsense. Utter garbage from the two of them.

"There is most definitely a plan, growth will follow. SP and business aren't the same thing"

That has to be one of the most outrageous claims I've ever read. The share price would never have been decimated to the extent that it has, if the business performance had been better. A pure, 100% tradey classic. One for the ages.

"UK markets massively undervalued

Another excuse as to the woefully bad share price.

Same old tosh and it's the markets fault again.

Rampers eh looking for an excuse"

It's the economy, stupid!

"Wincanton another classic example of a company that dropped over 90 percent of its value only to recover to all time highs.... "

What the southcoastcryptoconman cunningly omits is that Wincanton took nine years plus, to rise from its nadir to past its previous peak. Selectivity at its finest.

"He hasnt got the stones to confirm it Spidey

Nor his infamous IR letter - remember that folks.

Nor his Fashion Utd letter.

Just the same old same old rampy Tradey, pointless "facts" that are just gobbledygook in reality.

After calling this wrong all the way down from the 400's.

Deluded old foll trying to get his money back by ramping this to death, whilst denying reality (take look at that sp & chart) and suckering others, same old same old.

#trading4hisowngood"

Completely right, Daytradenovice. Called it wrong from the very top, absolutely all the way down to the 30s. Wrong every single step of the way, yet dished out non-stop abuse of anyone who dared to have a different opinion. Even optimists weren't spared derision and were eventually alienated. And now, armed with multiple new IDs, his bingo words are creeping back in. "Fud" ring a bell, anyone? Personally, I'm not in favour of reporting any of his new accounts. Let his bile continue to be seen for what it is.

Some stock of whataboutism going on today. I do hope everyone has topped up. Definitely wouldn't want to be out of this over the weekend. Engines on. Lunar trajectory. Off we go. Woosh!

"I pop over now and again to have a look at his comments, "pathetic, market manipulation, volume etc" but I've not seen him on whenever I've looked the last few months.

Is he still on or has he had a name change?"

Here's still here under cover of three seperate IDs, in my opinion.

"Just employ Stuart Little to oversee the decimation of the share price."

And my, did they certainly do that here, seemingly with the full blessing of the BOD. They're all still raking in millions of pounds per year regardless. Mahmud even has enough dough left over to go whacking it into an entirely different venture of late.

"Repetitive post again DTN. I bet you had a little pump, pump squirt in the bathroom again just before you hit post."

You're exercising double standards, Spunk. Yesterday coasty posted a link two times, yet you didn't throw your toys out, like you did with the Fashion United article. Board policemen conveniently looks the other way when a serial ramper is in full flow.

Taylor Swift as a brand ambassador??? Get real. Maybe Katie Price or Tulisa.

Heartwarming watching Coasty and Tradey 1 of 3 back together and dishing it out in tandem, like the old days. A hopelessly underwater tag team.

Coasty living his best life, supposedly! Still spends all day and night glued to the LSE boards, occasionally venturing out onto the beach, drawing hearts in the sand with "T4G" beneath. Takes great care not to get seawater in the "Rolex". Won't be long until his next TUI package jaunt, when he can do it all again.

"Finally, so your trapped in this share then? Wonder why you are so negative then, must be a serious sore looser, or have your full pocket money invested."

I've stated repeatedly that I'm invested. Repeatedly. Have you been in a coma? Head up your behind? 77p breakeven. I won't put a penny more in until this lot get their act together, which doesn't look like anytime soon. I could average further down but refuse to on point of principle. The funds can sit. At least I get a wee bit back from loaning the shares out for shorting. Makes a mockery of your "uninvested" claims.

You are trapped. Otherwise you would have traded your way out.

"If people want to see change then there needs to be some sort of levy introduced where companies who don't meet ESG targets and are of a certain turnover, receive fines or are taxed a % of revenue."

Yes indeed, Kachrafilter, I would be delighted if ESG regulations were used for proper purposes such as this, and applied across all markets. Shame they've been hijacked and abused to enforce ideological aims.

Cut off in the middle of adding a sentence in there. I was saying that: the occasional scandal or adverse report is to be expected in the running of a business. Some person or group always goes rogue. Focus slips. Changing regulations aren't addressed adequately through altered business practices. But the sheer frequency, gravity and repetitiveness of dodgy practices is absolutely staggering. Too frequent to be blithely explained away by "shorter-funded articles".

"Article published today by Fashion Utd. https://fashionunited.com/news/business/timeline-behind-boohoo-s-boulevard-of-broken-promises/2024022358566"

Sobering reading when viewed in one entire piece. I'm not claimning that other companies are squeaky clean, but this is one seriously long and grave list. Scandals all to public and freqEach transgression countered or deflected with "Wasn't us, honest", "Human error", etc. A business (seemingly) built on screwing people over, taking advantage and being economic with the truth. But, Lambos and mansions have to be bought somehow.

It's OK though folks, coz UMAR!!! Big Mike, Rolls Royce, tons of profitable returned goods will turn the ship around.

"And I'm not a vocal supporter daytrade. As posted before I'm in at 33p to make money. This is far from a perfect business but it is well undervalued imho

You post here nearly twice as much as I do!!"

Did you miss a zero off the end of that price, tradey?