Member Info for BobsSocks

Then define WEB3.0

Facebook appear to be betting on the *metaverse* which I would interpret as being online identities within their 3D walled garden. This would be their version which is just an extension of what they do already. Trap people in a proprietary socially networked Hotel California and rape and sell their data to anyone who pays coin for it. In particular advertising.

Of course given the Metaverse is an online 3D world we get the suggestion that Facebook are going to buy out FundamentalVR for billions. The level of stupid involved in perverting the meaning of causality in support of that idea beggars belief.

Presumably Pires has an in-line gaming advertising play like...

https://twitter.com/ridicule1/status/1524727999123365891

"The fact that a crypto curency isn't actualy based upon anything real isn't relevant.... neither are fiat currencies."

I will admit to not being an economist but I had some idea that fiat currencies might have some foundation from being based on a country or countries associated with the currency performing some sort of economic activity generating income part of which is levied as taxes.

Now before you translate my definition into the realm of WEB3.0. Economic activity results in things like a Loaf of Bread or a Car. Not a 200x200 256 colour jpeg of a Monkey or some data on some block chain.

In respect of games I'll refer you back to,

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-06-10/axie-infinity-axs-crypto-game-promised-nft-riches-gave-ruin

Otherwise No.

Please do not play the something is either worth or projected to be worth billions or companies worth billions are moving into that space game.

Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Musk and the trillionaire Uncles Tom Dick and Harry have been touted as prospective purchasers of Terns portfolio probably since before you placed a punt on Tern and it hasn't happened.

However. Now it would appear that you have been truly caught in the shiny things dream as sold to you by Rhodi and their expert IT mate from the pub who faxes them paper when their three in one printer runs out.

Waves at Rhodi and looks forward to to tales of research done by themselves and others but never published along with the usual associated empty green box guff and an expression of being in the HODL camp.

Thanks...

Please correct me again if I am finding the wrong information.

https://plutodigital.com/

Takes over YOP.

https://imgur.com/a/rqqKwYI

https://yop.finance/

Claims 'up to' 65% APY, Annual Percentage Yield.

https://imgur.com/VH0MzRj

Let's take a look at that one,

https://www.kucoin.com/trade/YOP-ETH

https://imgur.com/M9sHLSl

I kid you not the site does not appear to give historic data beyond a week and in that time period the price has gone from 0.000700ETH to 0.0000699ETH

That's a drop of 90% in value in one week which strikes me as being the definition of CryptoCrash and yet Tern want you to have part of this action.

Now you know that I am not an investor but if I did hold Tern and they suggested to me that this is a good idea I would just exit entirely and immediately because when someone suggests to me that the above is a good idea I would assume they have lost their sense, sanity and marbles in order to chase their dreams of a get rich quick ponzi schem using my money.

Stuff that.

In the last Tern presentation one of the invites was someone from SVV. Associated RNS here,

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/TERN/svv-fund-investment-in-retinize/15369789

It would seem SVV also has a relationship with Pires and Pires directly or indirectly via SVV has interests in a or a number of gaming companies as well as some CryptoCrash plays.

In the presentation the representative of SVV expressed an interest in, perhaps enthusiasm for, pay to play in respect of gaming.

https://twitter.com/kushaanshah/status/1535272224743034880

"Wow This is Grim."

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-06-10/axie-infinity-axs-crypto-game-promised-nft-riches-gave-ruin

Why are Tern trying to take over this dross?

You, as an individual or acting in concert with others, have to declare any holdings above 1% within 10 business days of the original announcement, Tuesday 7th, and any dealings you make whilst the offer is in place.

https://www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Summary-of-provision-of-Rule-8-July-2021189117.3.pdf

Rather that huff and puff ask your broker or contact the takeover panel on the number in the above document to discover what your liabilities will be if you do not do so. You might not wish to bust a gut but they might bust it for you if you do not comply.

Hi. I notice that there have been a number of RNS publications under Tern and more so for Piri where people are posting their holdings due to some rule during a takeover for people with a 1% or above interest in the offerer or offeree companies within 10 days of the announcement,

https://www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Summary-of-provision-of-Rule-8-July-2021189117.3.pdf

As a just in case if you have not already done so and the rule does apply to you then assuming working days apply next Tuesday looks like the final day to get your notification in.

Ooops. Wrong board, sorry.

Hi. I notice that there have been a number of RNS publications under Tern and more so for Piri where people are posting their holdings due to some rule during a takeover for people with a 1% or above interest in the offerer or offeree companies within 10 days of the announcement,

https://www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Summary-of-provision-of-Rule-8-July-2021189117.3.pdf

As a just in case if you have not already done so and the rule does apply to you then assuming working days apply next Tuesday looks like the final day to get your notification in.

Interesting strategy. Assuming I read you correctly you are buying Pires at sub the Tern offer price of 8 pence in the expectation that if the deal goes through you will get free money or rather free Tern shares. I assume you have seen the recent RNS announcements for Pires which suggest holders are in fact selling off or converting 4 pence options in order to sell off whilst you are being clever by buying as the Pires sp drops whilst at the same time the Tern sp is also dropping. I'm not sure I understand the logic. The sums are a bit hard for me but the 8 pence offer was made when Pires were at 5.2 pence. Since the offer Tern has fallen 24.2% so the 8 pence offer is now equivalent to 6 pence with Pires having dropped 7.7% to 4.8 pence. I think you need to be a bit careful here because seems to me that if Tern continue to drop faster than Pires then throwing money at Pires could work out to be a negative sum. You are in effect playing with two falling knives and betting on which one falls faster with the added disadvantage that both knifes are decreasing in value.

"An attempt to reverse Pluto Digital into NFT PLC ( a quoted company) was aborted earlier this year & that may be back on the agenda at some point in the not too distant future-which will create a value & some liquidity in that investment.It will be interesting to whether Downes is appointed to our Board should the merger proceed."

https://www.nftinvest.pro/

"Non-fungible tokens (NFT’s) are a special class of assets on the blockchain characterized by being unique and non-interchangeable with one another for equal value. An NFT is different from a cryptocurrency in that it is defined by metadata that builds-in a role, function, and value that are unique to it. "

Nice try Bros.

One of the problems with these CryptoCrash style of companies is that the originators get to exit with profit before the mugs. Why are Pires trying to sell themselves to Tern when their investments have generated no mugs. Unless they think Tern are mugs.

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/PIRI/exercise-of-warrant/15482533

You get three choices.

1) They bought £26,000 of Pires at 4p so they can sell them at a profit when the price goes up.
2) They bought £26,000 of Pires at 4p so they can sell them before the company goes bust.
3) They had to exercise their options due to time limits.

Option 1) If the price goes up they could still exercise the options at 4p.
Option 2) If the company goes bust their options are worthless.
Option 3) No difference to Option 2).

Conclusion. Someone is using a dodge to get out of Dodge City.

Just asking the source to validate the claims. I have no idea why you would wish others not to know.

Subject: KeyScaler endorsement by The Department of Homeland Security.

Dear Ms Bunn

There has recently been some speculation on UK investment forums about the following publication on the dhs.gov website,

https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/science-and-technology-directorate-interschutz-2022

Specifically it relates to the mention of KeyScaler,

"and an opportunity to learn about KeyScaler, a digital platform that provides total device, data and operational trust for IoT"

Some are claiming that this represents a direct endorsement for KeyScaler from The Department of Homeland Security.

KeyScaler is a product of Device Authority and Device Authority have also recently mentioned their attendance at Interschutz,

https://www.deviceauthority.com/events/interschutz/

Device authority is registered as a company in the UK,

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/04676191

They also have an entity registered in the US, Delaware, under 5434661.

Device Authority is also a portfolio company of the UK investment company TERN which is listed on the AIM stock market,

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/stock/TERN/tern-plc/trade-recap

The aforementioned speculation is being touted by investors in TERN presumably in support of their holdings and I have no doubt that if such an endorsement had been given and was supportable it would have a significant impact on the valuation of Device Authority itself and by extension TERN.

I am concerned that this speculation may be misleading so I am seeking some clarity in respect of the importance of KeyScaler to the departments you represent, The Department of Homeland Security itself and, if any, the possibility of wider adoption by the US Government in support of their Cyber Security efforts.

In as much as you are able I would appreciate your comments and, with your permission, the opportunity to make them available on the associated forums.

Faithfully

BobsSocks

I note that the interim report,

https://www.wyldnetworks.com/directus/assets/12309aa6-c5b2-476d-bd01-9b200a28b402

makes no mention of patents although there is still a reference to previously acquired intellectual property.

Nothing new here beyond the third party observation,

https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP21709349&lng=en&tab=doclist

Subject: KeyScaler endorsement by The Department of Homeland Security.

Dear Ms Bunn

There has recently been some speculation on UK investment forums about the following publication on the dhs.gov website,

https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/science-and-technology-directorate-interschutz-2022

Specifically it relates to the mention of KeyScaler,

"and an opportunity to learn about KeyScaler, a digital platform that provides total device, data and operational trust for IoT"

Some are claiming that this represents a direct endorsement for KeyScaler from The Department of Homeland Security.

KeyScaler is a product of Device Authority and Device Authority have also recently mentioned their attendance at Interschutz,

https://www.deviceauthority.com/events/interschutz/

Device authority is registered as a company in the UK,

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/04676191

They also have a US division registered in the US, Delaware, under 5434661.

Device Authority is also a portfolio company of the UK investment company TERN which is listed on the AIM stock market,

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/stock/TERN/tern-plc/trade-recap

The aforementioned speculation is being touted by investors in TERN presumably in support of their investments and I have no doubt that if such an endorsement had been given and was supportable it would have a significant impact on the valuation of Device Authority itself and by extension TERN.

I am concerned that this speculation may be misleading so I am seeking some clarity in respect of the importance of KeyScaler to the departments you represent, The Department of Homeland Security itself and, if any, the possibility of wider adoption by the US Government in support of their Cyber Security efforts.

In as much as you are able I would appreciate your comments.

Faithfully

BobsSocks

"Bobssocks, I’m sorry but you are clearly the same person as listed as Emigna2020 on ADVFN, you’ve made far too similar quotes and phrases."

Maarleck, I’m sorry but you are clearly the same person as listed as Maarleck on ADVFN, you’ve made far too similar quotes and phrases.

It does not strike me as being strange that you have transferred your persona from ADVFN to LSE but you really have to pay more attention. Antelope, although they gave an half apology, accused me of being a Conservative Brexit supporter and appears to have become a little upset at being called a lefty then you come along and accuse me of being multiple someones I am not.

This seems to be a common trait among people such as yourself who suck lemons whilst claiming oranges and feel it is their right to dish it out whilst expecting no return.

Thanks to Antelope for advising me to post the response before I drink the bleach. I'll send the email tomorrow and post the content of both. Your worth it.

The best I get from your most recent missive is that S&T are treating Monitoring, Respirators and Keyscaler as three separate entities and are therefore endorsing each in isolation from each other. Given S&T are a department of Homeland Security by extension you are claiming that Homeland Security is endorsing Keyscaler.

I'll drop an email to the person mentioned on the page and ask for clarification but before I do so perhaps you might like to have some input as to how it is worded.

Oh. If you wish to blither about semantics,

"And nothing they say implies that KS is being sold as a Breeze component. There is a semi colon between 'Wildland Firefighter Respirator' and 'and an opportunity to learn about KeyScaler,.....'. Two different subjects therefore.

Occam's razor. Stop twisting it to find fault."

Try to refer to the right semantics.

https://www.breeze-technologies.de/blog/breeze-technologies-selected-for-long-term-deployment-of-wildfire-sensors-by-us-department-of-homeland-security/

Breeze has nothing to do with respirators. They are supplying the wildfire monitoring equipment.

Odball Voice. "To you Occam's Razor is something you put under a paper pyramid on your TV."

Speaking as a Conservative Brexit Supporter who does not get out enough it is hardly my fault that people such as yourself will go off half **** on a rampant ramp without looking harder at what they are ramping giving people such as myself the opportunity to call them whilst missing the opportunity to qualify the possible real meaning of their new found shiny.

It's not as if Mr Johnson has spent his premiership and indeed life ramping himself has had any effect on my of such behaviour when I come across it elsewhere. Or six years of exposure to blatant unqualified and unsupported ramping in respect of Tern and their portfolio companies where any questioning of the, lack of, information provided and its presentation is met with a hailstorm of the usual tired old meaningless, worthless, straw man, ad hominem insults.

You should thank your lucky stars that there are staunch Trump 2nd Amendment supporters such as myself prepared to stand up to you bleating lefty remoaning woke people who think the stock market owes you many pounds on the ha'penny because that's your definition of socialism as proscribed to you by someone else but you can't be bothered to check.

At least I am prepared to go the extra mile and admit, with qualification, where I have got something, in part, wrong rather that discounting your opinion as being one that is paid for by Zak Mir.

My initial thoughts may have been overly dismissive. The full quote is,

"This year S&T is proud to introduce its latest R&D efforts for fire fighters, such as a dual-use system for real-time wildfire detection and air quality monitoring, which has been proven in field trials; the Wildland Firefighter Respirator; and an opportunity to learn about KeyScaler, a digital platform that provides total device, data and operational trust for IoT, as connected IoT devices play a significant role in the work of first responders."

So. The Science and Technology Department (S&T) of US Homeland Security is going to be presenting with one of their departments (Fire) at the Intershutz 2022 exhibition where they will be providing information about trials that department has run with equipment which incorporates Keyscaler.

Yes, that sounds better but it is still not a direct endorsement from US Homeland Security. Why not go the extra mile and look at the timeline,

https://www.breeze-technologies.de/blog/breeze-technologies-selected-for-long-term-deployment-of-wildfire-sensors-by-us-department-of-homeland-security/
https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/news/2021/08/04/news-release-st-selects-performers-phase-ii-wildland-fire-sensor-research

The implication is that Breeze and N5 were chosen to compete to provide a solution back in 2021 and the latest announcement,

https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/science-and-technology-directorate-interschutz-2022

indicates or otherwise suggests that Breeze won the contract and, yes, it would seem that Keyscaler played a role in having the contract awarded given they are presenting it at Interschutz. Bottom of the page gives Additional Resources including,

https://www.dhs.gov/medialibrary/assets/videos/21982

Which will give you a better idea about the technology being discussed in IoT terms and make others shout Wyld!

They also provide you with a handy email address you might care to poke to see if you can find out more meaningful information about how important Keyscaler might be to them and the possibility of its wider adoption across the board.