Member Info for bluerill

I hope Larry's confirmation of how long the relationship with Siemens-Gamesa, which culminated in this deal, has been in development, . On that basis, for all you BMN apologists, it is therefore completely reasonable to assume that Bushveld would have been aware of the likelihood of this eventual, transformational deal when they embarked on their sale of their IES stake. Do the math, people. If Bushveld had had another source of capital to invest in Enerox, it is just dopey to imagine they would have sold their IES holding in the way they did and at the prices they got, given the info they would have been privy to.

I would suggest there isn't. They are completely out and have been for a little while. Meantime VSA interview with Larry: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7reuRfSft4

Hintza - bushveld finished selling months ago

Do you realise how profoundly muddled your (completely frivolous) comment is? You want Invinity shareholders to 'thank' bushveld for a business relationship that is what Bushveld is in business to do (ie., sell V), benefits both parties and is completely independent of the behaviour in question, and in doing so, ignore or forgive their deeply damaging action in selling down their stake in our company??? yeah, nah.

duh. I thought you were the smart on, alfa.

In fact, I have been purposefully quiet on bushveld since my original ranting out of reluctant acceptance that the cult of Fortune, etc is simply too deep and far gone for any effort to honestly analyse BMN's behaviour, to have any effect at all. However, if anyone insists on bringing back mention of that company and trying to spin their behaviour in selling down their strategic holding (their key role in getting the RTO deal done in the first place is and has been, duly acknowledged) in a positive light (AGAIN!), I will not be kind. Yes, this is a warning and yes, I'm being exactly as arrogant as I sound. Tough toenails.

please don't go there, alfa; you have no idea whatever about this transaction if you think that was a consideration. This deal has been long in the making and is completely driven by the tech and gamesa-siemens's view on Invinity's position within flow and the industry generally. bnm was entirely outside ANY material consideration and in fact, their desperate position selldown was a marginal nuisance if anything.

Invinity Energy Systems Raised to Buy at Canaccord; PT 260 pence

Transformational even. All in one, this RNS: 1. validates flow within the battery storage ecosystem; 2. validates Invinity's technology and competitive position within that ecosystem; 3. insures the future of IES by funding its next generation product; and 4. underpins the share price at 175p, establishing it as a support level for a move (much) higher.

That's because it was answered here and elsewhere the day it was announced. Ferguson was on 6-month probation as CFO, was judged to have done a weak ass job and was, um, encouraged to resign. The only difference between you and him is that he could take a hint.

Of course, the BP legend spells it 'Browne'. Still, this John Brown has solid O&G bone fides and continues the slow but steady upgrading of the Board. https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/SLE/board-changes/14967231

www.stoplurkingonmessageboardsandgetsomerealworkdone.com

yeah, #getalifealready

would appear this chap is largely responsible for the bounce so far: https://twitter.com/MylesMcNulty

'Continued-restrictions-on-new-hydrocarbon-exploration-among-wealthy-nations-from-Norway-to-Canada-to-the-US-due-to the-rise-of-the-influence-of-Green-politics-set-to-further-benefit-major-developing-world-producers-like-Nigeria-as-GDP-growth-and-oil-prices-continue-to-rebound-from-Covid', TheVerityTimes

thanks for translating, Al!

Don't worry, kd. You are likely to see your heart's desire in the next update

no he's not. standard levels of bashing. only difference is I have taken a break from owning him so he's kind of faffing around on his own for the past week or so. Tell you what, happy. Why don't you go over there and set him straight?

ah....well, not exactly. I certainly wasn't referring to the Sep reference as corrupt, even vapid. That one was just ridiculous. Much better

Not sure what you're driving at, KD. My observation stands.