Member Info for bluerill

In my opinion, billy (ugh), you are just smart enough to understand how transparently meaningless what you just wrote is, yet not nearly enough to understand that you ended up owning yourself. Good work.

Even if we did agree on anything, I would deny it, you desperate phoney. Read what I wrote. I never opined on the results to March year-end. Good, bad, indifferent, they are irrelevant. However, your insistence on constantly invoking them is even more so.

no, no, no, no, no. WE all know that the results to March 21 are M.E.A.N.I.N.G.L.E.S.S. You, on the other hand, as someone engaged in a deliberate effort to engage in a none-too-subtle Harold Shipman-esque operation to undermine sentiment and therefore the share price, infer that those results will necessarily be 'pizz' poor and therefore are somehow relevant, WHICH THEY ARE NOT. Can you see the slightly bigger distinction between yourself and reality now maybe?

still more sensible than some

I was afraid that was the case. Went right over my head

I'm not exactly sure what that means, seb, but from where I sit, the overall rhythm and spirit of today's 2 thread discussions - despite vascular's usual efforts to break both into little pieces and fill them full of discord - are actually of a much higher standard than normal.

Drinking is also unhealthy, Dave. So are processed sweets. And too much salt. And red meat......And yet, here we all are consuming any or all of those - and others - to excess. Because in the end, we're all human and from where I sit right now, I have 0 problem with some tiny % of people worldwide - in addition to the primary sales strategy you've already described - who have never smoked before - ie., millions of potential customers - making dedication to Chill smokes the latest addition to their guilty pleasures and engage with it beyond what might otherwise be entirely advisable.

not addictive steve, but very moorish. something between my first Kit Kat and my first bong hit

I am a non-smoker who went through his Chill sample pack in 3 days. I wonder if anyone has any idea what the size of the market is of people who never picked up the habit but still think smoking-without-dying looks cool? How about the non-cigarette-smoking-but-sure-I-smoked-dope-as-a-kid-who-didn't-love-it demographic? Has anyone done any work on the size of those markets? Vascular, you must have considered this already. We could call it the Smoking Initiation market.

pound sand, lol, you transparent imposter

No. No one can help you as you appear objectively beyond hope.

I'm expecting all the usual TW roaches - and some new useful idiots - to crawl out of the woodwork in his 'defence' after this lovely distillation on advfn of who and what this half-man, half-sentient-virus truly is about: '....Quote of the month from a recent conversation with a good old boy who's been there, done that : "No one sues winnifrith mostly because they know he has no assets. Just a miserable website that pays him a couple of grand a month from Google advertising if it manages to generate enough clicks. So basically, if he doesn't keep the phoney outrage amped up, he doesn't eat. That's been his 'business model', give or take, for 30 years. Sure the FCA is aware of his misbehaviour but until some fed-up company exec gets frustrated enough to bring a largely private prosecution, they just treat him like the family's crazy, ****** uncle at Christmas dinner...."

ok obstando, but for the record, not as long as I have

look, obstando, I don't want to fight with anyone, certainly not you, but the reason I believe that guys like Vivian can push out crap like that is because frankly, they often look legit and more importantly, I don't believe guys like you are really ready to adequately push back on it. In this most recent case, read what I've written. While I may use a lot of fiery language, the main message that his premise is fatally flawed because that is NOT how new, high-growth (even low growth) consumer product companies are valued in today's stock markets. This is absolutely crucial for everyone to understand, and many with less experience in markets will NOT get that either through others calling him a villain or even worse, just leaving him on ignore. So you come on. Bring your A game and find a way to both troll-hunt AND educate.

well titled.... Otherwise, that is NOT how share prices of early-growth companies producing consumer goods, enjoying even the most understated kind of growth that you flaccidly describe there, are calculated. Ever. Not in this universe or the one you inhabit. Conservative, liberal democrat, labour, makes absolutely no difference. Your entire premise, no matter how deliberately you may try to present it, is totally, objectively, utterly flawed and therefore ANYTHING that comes after is moot. How's that? Wanna try again, again?

what. like a fast growing consumer products company that trades on 10x earnings? Or ignoring sanctioned revenue data running at 7x growth in a month and reducing it to 'duh, let's see......that must mean the shops are making £10/day...' ? You mean that kind of not making any sense? Otherwise, false prophet = read a book, witless = without that which makes someone remotely interesting.

truly, there is only one thing worse than a false prophet and that's a witless opponent.

that stuff doesn't work on me. read a book

Vascular -read a book

grrrrrr.....I have a particular problem with phoneys