RE: Chairman discussion30 Apr 2026 15:11
Yes, a Cope/Carver playbook likely signals a more significant corporate restructuring or capital focused phase of development, which is probably what we all anticipate anyway. There are some big boardroom calls to make with cool heads in light of the global helium market. They have one project already at market in a safe jurisdiction with a detailed phased plan for major development all mapped out, which could be rapidly accelerated with moderate to significant capital input (if the JV partner could be supported or bought out). They have a strategic resource potentially available to Asia from East Africa long term if it can be proved commercially, but nowhere near market ready and requiring both recurrent cost and major capital investment. Bird in the hand, bird in the bush. If Rukwa could be proved up with push from a farm-in then the smart thing to do might be to sell it on (maybe maintaining a passive share) and use the funds to invest aggressively in expanding US production quickly, or building portfolio with another safe/near market acquisition. Cope/Carver are capital raising and governance experts. They also have some track record in carving off profitable company arms from companies in order to ditch the burdened shell. But in the hypothetical scenario here that would mean abandoning the historic ‘flagship’ and probably losing those on the board with their hearts and careers in East African exploration. Just speculation of course.