Member Info for blt2

wtf has Strand Hanson been doing for their money....seems like nothing?
any due diligence on CRA?
not advising that the fundraise should have been for more?
no attempt at money raise for $4m....not even PrimanyBId!
advising administration to protect assets from leboam breakup maybe?
and FCA/LSE will be no help.
gla, for what its worth.

" The data gathered from the Well will, subject to funding,"

How do you konw?

What price?

Ta.

Thanks stockdale, but oh deer! (the best i can do). The silence is deafening. i was waiting for some solid rebuttles or at least abuse, but they never came. more fool me. sorry about your holding, and mine, I hope you have averaged down(ish). you seem a good sort. rumination = username (ha)? I hope you do well. good luck.

yearly income (euros) = 300000pmx12=3600000-basic running costs=net profit=1-1.5mil at ye.?? costs for development=1.5mil+? enough profit to get pg11a and pipeline sorted? 30? people at meeting say no to fund raise, so BOD can site that as reason for no movement! 22.6m = 1% of shares. same with a group of lse posters, what % of shares? can they get a vote of no confidence, and if they do then what? still no development money + costs of change. (I have a few million, but not 10m or even a 100m, people with that holding i dont think post on bulletin boards?) so what? get a bank loan (can they make repayments on current net profits?) get ippc (and i think they might be stuffed, the GOV have them here if not playing straight, who would they prefer to progress?), and even then AST still need money to progress. a t/o and at what price? if someone has to pay a 12 month high thay can just wait till it drops towards year end or worse! BOD can sit and wait, hands tied, being paid and no skin in game! if fund raise what discount? 12-20% from what .90p, .70p? bit of a bind and not looking too good short term. i held and im losing a chunk of money. Pi%%ed n broke. sorry for feeling sorry for myself. Give me something real.

Good one. I'll amend my rant. Thanks.

You just need to keep in mind one thing. CEOs etc are never, ever, EVER paid to give a negative view. Its all positive, always. That�s their job, what theyre paid for. Even when its a crock. It�s what they teach in MBA 101. Very occasionally they will be telling the truth.. ALB.

So you think they will use the latest loan to buyout the previous. And they have a contract or two lined up in the meantime, within 90 days. Lets hope they do. I dont think its a fraud by any means, just business IKN.. GLA, really.

So you got the reference. You asssume i'm being negative? Why not question the original poster? I can appreciate both views. as maybe do the big sellers against the small buyers. But sentiment can be all. What do you think re the RNS I quoted? early re-payment ? Robbing peter to pay paul maybe? It all costs. Time will tell. GLA

er, Wot about the RNS of 19 jan 2018 ? I always worry about massive posts which block out negative/alternative views. GLA.

Again (and again), pom and dolf, a healthy cynisism. I certainly wouldn't believe anything a company person emailed, twitterd or otherwise said off the record. Just like i wouldnt trust auditors. They are paid to put a good spin on everything. thats their job and what they teach in an MBA. Lets just hope Peel know more eh. Why not ride the optmism, sentiment etc, even if its misplaced in your view? Could you explain your positions? is it pure altruism? have a good one.

pom & dolf i'm not sure why you think i have shown any disrespect. A certain scepticism re the negaivity maybe? I really Do appreciate both your views especially valid ones which you both make. But i think Peel might have a better handle amd insider knowlege on things? And it might all come to nought! I just find it strange with any who repeatedly post negative views, because it doesnt do the company, which you supposedly have an interest in, any good. Thats not to say i support constant blind ramping. But if you dont think its any good, why not post, get out and and into eqt and let us make our mistakes? It doesn't make sense. Thats alll. Again, regards.

You're obviously keeping a keen eye open on this company. Why? Are you and pom related? Such altuistic individuals, looking out for our financial wellbeing. Both of you NOT posting on the mutitude of loss making AIM companies, not under these ids anyway. Are you related to peel holdings by any chance? That well known loss making company. But if peel are involved maybe theres something there. They arent numties, like us poor saps. But thanks for your concern. If i see issues i get out, post a warning and then leave them to it. if it tanks you can always look back and think, well i did warn them, Post back then and gloat about it if you must. regards.

Personally I like what i hear from this board. Not the usual Aim self serving garbage. Could go far IMHO.