RE: People now buying back31 Mar 2026 17:10
Biggest negative for Pulsar is the State government of Minnesota whose dense personnel, having no experience with natural resource regulation, are now called upon to create an entire regulatory regime from scratch. These same personnel hold little affection for extractive industries on firmly-held ideological grounds. The webinar speaker, when asked about these, understandably but clearly exhibited a distressed demeanor, stating that the company is undertaking a 'bipartisan' effort to overcome these obstacles. There is no need for bipartisanship as the Republican party is firmly supportive but, being in the minority, of little influence. His comment was, rather, a coded reference to project resistance from leftist Democrats who run the State.
The biggest threat to Pulsar's success is not geology or engineering - both are marvelously favorable - but State politics. Take great care not to understimate the capacity of the George Floyd crowd to initiate a full-on assault of Helium, Topaz and, yes, Pulsar, as its newest ideological target.