Member Info for BlairPeach

Blinking flip, I hope we are not waiting beyond the end of 2020 for the elusive EU funds!

Tango1,

That is extremely rude and certainly uncalled for; from your quote, you appear to be aiming that comment primarily at Setanta1 (and doubtless others, including me) - as far as I can ascertain, Setanta1 is a genuine, frustrated long-term holder of INFA shares and deserves far more respect than you can lower yourself to afford.

Your posts over the last several months do you no favours in the muppetry stakes...

Radders,

"...it appears equity funding is there if needed".

I can just hear the conversation now (as per the official narrative):

INFA: Look, fellas, you are all really pretty an' all, but I still reckon there's a prettier thing out there for us. We are going to lift our skirt in front of the politicians and see what sweetness they can offer. If it doesn't work out, though, we sure would be happy for you boys to come back in and serenade us all over again - sexiest one wins!

Multiple funders (in unison): Sure, John, take as long as you need, we'll be here for you.

Previous forecasts were all based on a substantially lower number of shares, I can't believe that so many people can't understand the extent of the damage caused to pre-existing shareholders by a many-fold dilution. There are simply too many shares and potential shares in circulation for anything exciting to happen here for a long time. I seem to recall offering a wager before Christmas to anyone who thought that the share price would be 0.6p, 1p, 2p by the end of January, sadly I had no takers...

Chrisatrdg,

Steady on, "back" into profit is somewhat revisionist...!

Blimey, I hope that is something to do with Riverfort and not one of our shiny white-knight institutions!

Hmm, surely "City" is worthy of a capital "C" (or perhaps not!)?

Lottie123 is correct about the dilution;

Share price x number of shares in issue = market cap - I am sure many on here don't understand that it is the last number that matters, not the first, honestly...

Not sure how many will turn up at 6am on a Saturday - could be a canny move!

Sorry, I don't understand Twitter.

Is this a good thing or a bad thing for LTHs?

Do you really think that there was funding on the table?

Didn't stop it going bust a few short months later.

Success!

Spud,

Obviously I do believe that the institutional investors moved in at 0.3p in expectation of a return, but as I have posited prior, I would expect most of them to bail long before the share price approaches 1p, never mind 2p. Of course, the act of bailing will send the share price back down again, hence my previous reference to the yo-yo effect. Different institutions will work to different parameters, but I would expect some to start to move at 0.5p, if not earlier - a 67% return in what could (hopefully!) be a short period of time would satisfy their clients.

Speedy,

I trusted JW, the BOD and their 2019 plans and look where that got me!

You suggest a return to previous highs in 2020. I will ignore the 98p high back in the early days, that would be preposterous, but let's wind back the clock a short 12 months - do you really see a return this year to 2p+ (I agree with Spud that this was a false spike, but JW was bragging at that time, so let's stick with it), given the number of shares now in issue?

Why has the share price collapsed over the last 12 months?

There are none so blind as cannot see.

I wonder whether the incomer's initials will be J and W?

If only he were as on-point with his milestones...

When a CEO decides to set himself a series of milestones, which are subsequently missed, is it unreasonable for shareholders to want to know why?

NerdyOwl,

"Transparent" is certainly not an accusation that can be levelled at the INFA board!