RE: Lloyds shares24 Feb 2026 12:18
T, perhaps lowly paid workers, would suit your fault finding exercise easier to grasp, rather than using any words that woke readers get upset about.
No matter the results are the same, and whilst we all know the value of a road sweepers, cleaners, car washers, checkout staff etc, the fact that most anyone could 'leave' a job which needed more quals, experience and skills to achieve and within a day or two be able to 'do their job' if fit enough, whereas the lowly paid jobs, or people would be very unlikely to be able to step into, say like a financial advisors job, or doctor, or solicitor etc etc.
So what, as you well know, I am saying is, with a growing able labour force, then to add the once higher paid dismissed dead wood to be searching for the more physical jobs that AI will have less a detrimental effect upon will cause more unemployment as the lower paid jobs market often can't fund their own rent, mortgages, child care, without the addition of what was child tax credits, now universal credit, thus Taking, and not adding to the revenue for the chancellor, so higher taxes for those left in employment
As people who have been used to a good wage find they are competing in the low paid sector to job search, then defaults on homes, cars, loans are highly likely, should the once well heeled earn far less, then dragging down Lloyds, as although the ex employers of such gain greatly they are lower in number than their employees, so a case of more harm than good as far as Lloyds will be concerned as far as I see. Of course RR will then tax company profit more to try to counteract the sacked workers not paying any or less taxes on lower wages, but as they will likely claim benefits too, a double whammy for Rach.
STP I get your take, and I know all about luddites etc and other horrors that were thought by the dim to make us all poorer, which eventually worked out, but for many the intervening time, until it does is costly for many, and I feel it will be for Lloyds as to retrain is time consuming, costly and to do what exactly. The TV ad's vacancies and actors now seem more of a diverse option, and most jobs, such as health care, prison services, fire service costs the UK money, not creating any for the good of the country, so to find well paid, enough to fund your family without taking benefits, and to produce wealth is very hard now when up against AI a multi national companies. A.I may not effect so much mainly physical work, but which many are unable to do if old, ill or lazy which fits a large proportion of the current out of work. Some not out of work as never been in work
Hope you are right an Lloyds gains from such, but for reasons given have doubts.