Directors Commitment26 Sep 2013 02:22
Currently the Duncans and Mr Holloway own nearly 35% of the business and have lent it £160000 ....data c/o Investorease
21-03-2013 David John Holloway 8,660,666 10.2 %
21-03-2013 Ronald James & Helen Lyn Duncan 20,981,472 24.66 %
Under the offer they would be entitled to a further 2 million shares......what are they taking up ....a mere 150K each. Are they paying for them with their own hard cash??.....
Salary of directors
RJ Duncan £78,000
HL Duncan £78,000
DJ Holloway£156,000
These salaries ....from accounts 31.12.12 are a staggering £312K...over 27% of TOTAL STAFF COSTS...
No instead off backing this company with great growth prospects and a recent share price at 60+p they are TAKING THEIR MONEY OUT OF THE COMPANY AT 33P....by capitalising 100K of their loan and taking the remaining money out....so they don't think ATUK...soon to be Cloud Buy is worth buying at 33p....but I lay money they'll grant themselves large options at the current market price...in a few months time when the sp has fallen below the offer price.
If you have been sucked into the company in the last few weeks and are thinking of taking your offer up remember the following
(a) The company is loss making and has been every year since its inception
(b) Its T/o is barely 2 million and the Tungsten deal will add less than 500K pa in revenue...the VISA money is blue sky....it may be millions it may be pennies.....VISA are the driving force behind the fee going to a per unit used basis....perhaps they have their doubts...no transactions no cost to them, slow rewards for @UK.......
(c) The directors have always talked a good talk and have made a handsome living from the business at shareholders expense but have repeatedly failed to deliver the profits they promise. - look back at the RNS's for 2011 and 12 and the declining share price
(d) They admit to having got their pricing wrong in the offer document I quote "Having surveyed the market and the competition, @UK has concluded that it has been undercharging for its services." But will users accept a big price increase ?? Not if thesavings are not there.
(e) They admit their marketing is rubbish and the product has not delivered savings.Again I quote from the Offer Doc "@UK's challenge has been explaining this to procurement departments which, because of the competition's limitations, tend to believe that spend analysis is just the categorisation of spend into high level categories such as stationery, furniture and travel. This has been compounded by the fact that the UK public sector has made limited savings to date".
(f) The smart money bought these at 8-11p and are now long gone...with their money in the bank...
(g) There are NO PREDICTIONS or forecasts of future profitability in the offer document...so the directors have not put their necks on the block if the £5million is eaten up in ineffective marketing and expe