Member Info for bignose58

Pom,

That's correct, but why should they be forgiven for constantly providing shareholders with false information and false hopes. We are meant to be dealing with professionals, are we not ?

Pom

They may be normal for normal Pharma, but if our management had gone down the route of the 20 dose can to begin with, we could probably have had FDA approval by the end of this year or next instead of possibly 2023. Its truly unbelievable.

Maybe you are right. Maybe they aren't talking to each other.... :-)

Ok

What I posted was a response by yours truly when I posed the question since what was written in the AR was, yet again, confusing.

Pom

As I posted last Thursday, neither RPG or Plethora are developing new drugs.

Extract from my post (direct from the horses mouth....or should I write hooves...LOL):
From purely a Regent standpoint though, as yet we do not have any other products that are being developed by Regent (and Plethora) directly as our attention and efforts are being directed into the continued commercialisation of Fortacin™ in the jurisdictions and territories previously announced.

Unless you have been advised otherwise ?

Prof

Not just Singapore, but the all important HK.

Ooohh Mist a bit.

Mind you, even if we had, we would probably still be where we are today .....LOL

Seems like another one, a bit more closer to home, is having troubles. SP down 50% due to their trial for the reformulation of sildenafil not working.

It certainly makes our product look even more attractive. Id hate to think where we would be now if our product had also failed trials. Mind you.

Now even more of a need for us to formulate a Viagra spray ???

Hi Pom

Thanks for the response. To be honest I had noticed that, however. Why don't they just write in the follow up documents the correct information ie they were submitted in October. it would seem everything is deliberately written to be vague, misleading and in some instances incorrect. They must really do think all share holders are idiots since its non stop.

And here is yet another example:
Apparently during the development, PSNW used a fill size ranging from 300L to 380L – the current fill rate is around 340L to produce 50,000 cans. The important thing is that PSNW were looking at producing 50,000 cans from the upsize (19,200 cans being the 100L vessels original batch size).

Why not just write that in the first place rather than confuse by implying that the upscaling went from 100L to 300L to 380L ??? (This is probably what caused the manufacturing delay, as you suggested, since they obviously spent time farting around aiming for 50k cans).

Anyways, I hope the info is of some interest to a few..... LOL

I'm also a little confused on when we should expect approval for HK and Macau.

Whereas I was expecting possible approval in Jun/July as many others here for Macau based on the extreme stated 12 months, it seems that both the PLE and RPG annual reports refer to the applications recently being made which I take as meaning recently = within the last few weeks of Dec2016 if not after (given the reports were released in 2018), Does that now indicate that approval cannot be expected till Dec 2018 or after for Macau and much later for HK ?

Apols, that 2nd line should read as "Oct 2017 Operations Update"

Well I'm totally confused now with respect to the 300L and 380L upscaling.

In the Oct 2017 they talk about the 380L upscaling process being started. Then in the Dec 2017 manufacturing update they talk about how the company received confirmation from PSNW that 300L upscale complied with the release spec which would also allow Recordati to pay the full 4mill euros without withholding anything. Then in both the PLE 2017 AR on page 6 and the RPG 2017 AR page 12 it states that Recordati paid the 4mill without withholding anything because the 380L batches have come back within specification. Yet, were we not led to believe it all hinged on the 300L batch size coming back within spec ???

What I am wondering is whether the original 300L batch size was changed to 380L batch size since surely they both cannot contain the same typo ???

Further to my previous posts on the scale up exercise using the 380L.

Seems I misquoted the information posted on p10 of the RPG AR. It could be considered as deliberate to see if anyone had read the paragraph, but alas no one picked it up........bad students....stay after school....LOL

What I initially posted was that 300L = 50k cans, but now on rereading both the RPG and PLE AR's it seems my dyslexia caught up with me and the 50k cans is for the 380L, which I have had confirmed from yours truly.

Any-road-up, what this indicates, if anyone is interested, is that the original batch size was a quarter of this since they state that the increase using 380L increased batch size 3 fold. So original batch size was approx. 12.5k cans.

You can make your own assumptions on what cans were used for this n that and those provided for the original UK launch (we still dont know exactly how many of the 20dose cans were sold), but although all water under the bridge, some may find it interesting if keeping track of these things as I do.... ;-)

Onwards and upwards...... :-)

Thanks Pom/kb for that, I forgot to check with CH :-)

I now have the full set and will apply for my Blue Peter and Tufty club badges......

Hopefully some news soon as things seem to be picking up.... keep the faith...LOL

Morning Pom

Excuse my ignorance, but whats CH. 2017 ?

There doesn't appear to be a PLE AR for 2016, well I cannot find one and nothing is posted as ref here. Suffice to say that most it would seem were employed by RPG before the TO. Actually within the RPG 2014 AR there are still listed 19 employees.................. Am I missing something here ? Obviously some were let go if the total is still 19 ???

But I'd still be interested to know what they all are doing.... :-)

At in the PLE 2014 AR there were only 5 employees. 4 of which were admin and management.

So any idea who the majority of the 19 employees are still on the books ?

Ha ha ha Prof

I meant all the people working there....maybe I should have written goffa's..... :-)

It could just be some sexpectation on mid term results/update. Has some info been leaked given the size of some of the buys. As discussed a profit warning is expected which could indicate preliminary sales figure magnitude ? Or just other news re ROW and or HK/Macau approvals.