Member Info for Bigears1170

Https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/143021-62#overview

Looks 👀 like that RNS caught a few with their trousers around their ankles 🤭

BV

I think it’s easy to read too much in to his employment arrangement.

I draw a few crumbs of comfort that he ( hopefully ) has a team working under the umbrella of that company as there is zero commercial nous to help him out on that board. I’m sure there is a team working away there somewhere.

Perhaps those timelines correlate with Coughlin's selective communications with her Telegram clique !

I read an interesting cringe tweet yesterday ( from a serious X poster ), which in part crowed;-

"The TG ( Telegram ) ultras have done a lot more than you realise to benefit this share"… such a self-congratulatory " laddish " narcissistic slap on the back kind of provides a flavour of the elevated level of self-importance fermenting within that cabal, with the implied suggestion ( to my mind ) being that we have the butcher, the baker, and the candlestick maker poking their collective beaks into the business & gives the whiff of the lunatics ( in part ) running the asylum.

If true, it's concerning that they are being listened to. Let's hope those chickens don't come home to roost.

Not only is Gabon another basket case ;-

“Revenues will be driven by embarking passenger numbers using the airports and funded by a per passenger fee, denominated in USD, collected through the ticketing system and payable directly to Westminster by the airlines or a suitable collection agency such as the International Air Transport Association ('IATA').”

Currently $84m of blocked IATA funds from the XAF zone. “Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, and Gabon.”

100%

👍

AS is history - these are five year lows , CC is swimming in positive date - we have no PR , its not much to ask for .....Ill say it till I am blue in the face , we have an oncologist playing at being a CEO.

Id rather have an industry proven CEO that knew a little about oncology than an oncologist that knows a little about being a CEO

BV , that was an extract , it was 3 pages long and went to CC and others by recorded and signed for delivery....FWIW I don't expect a response

Paul Hill / Investor Meets ? I don't care so long as what they have, when they decide to say it reaches the largest possible audience possible

As a concerned shareholder of Avacta PLC for five years. I am writing to address an issue that has come to my attention and raised significant concerns for myself and the wider investment community.

It has become apparent that selective and possibly "material" information is regularly being disseminated to a select group of shareholders within a closed Telegram group ( # Avacta Investment Discussion Group ), purportedly by senior company officers. The identities of these officers are now widely known within the investment community, as this news has become a topic on various social media platforms.

I want to remind all Avacta PLC officers of their responsibilities and obligations under regulations concerning fair disclosure. The Market Abuse Regulation ( MAR ) prohibits the officers of a public limited company from sharing non-public and material information with persons while excluding the markets; this could be deemed unfair and potentially illegal insider trading.

From an ethical perspective, regardless of whether this practice crosses the line into insider trading, it is undeniably unprofessional, unfair, unbalanced, disingenuous, lacking transparency, showing contempt for the wider Avacta shareholder community, and reflecting poorly on the company's management.

The selective distribution of such information creates an uneven playing field and raises questions about the integrity of our company's information disclosure practices and questionable public relations strategy.

As a publicly listed company, Avacta PLC and its officers must uphold the highest transparency and fair disclosure standards to ensure an equal playing field for all shareholders who rely on timely news updates.

Please reflect on these allegations of selective information disclosure and consider how to communicate more equitably and fairly with the market, including the loyal ,patient and well-meaning Avacta investment community that the board has chosen to neglect.

Additionally, if the company had a well-developed and strategic public relations (PR) approach, back channels to dictatorial Telegram groups would not be necessary.

Today's atrocious share price, which is at a five-year low in spite of the outstanding work of our scientists, undeniably speaks to a dysfunctional and ineffectual PR strategy from the company management. A robust PR strategy could positively influence market perception and address the current share price and market sentiment challenges.

In conclusion, because the Avacta Telegram group leaks like a broken sieve, consider how the information you have planned for your March “selective” communication might be better distributed. Your predecessor regularly communicated with shareholders via Vox Markets and directly with Mr Paul Hill on a one-to-one basis. This approach was well-received and equitably distributed, thus fostering a sense of inclusivity.

🤣 “The contract is based on Westminster's managed services model “ that would be the rinse & repeat model ……. 90 days it is then 🤥

Coughlin has plenty to say , she thinks the best way to improve relations with her investors is a 40 min telephone call with TG group … No serious investor can disagree that that 40 minutes would have been better spent with an investor meets or VOX markets 1-2-1 pumped out to the markets . That she can’t see that herself tells you all you need to know about her attention to all things PR .

FFS “ deramper “ - who needs derampers when you have a “ leadership “ team like ours , it’s their unwillingness / inability to engage the markets that’s driving this down

Patience 🤣 I can buy in tomorrow morning for the same price I did five years ago ….The share price is a joke ,Coughlin now presiding over the five-year low, and it is for one reason and one reason alone: the complete & total disregard of meaningful shareholder comms.

Plenty of tub thumpers defending what she can and can't say , yet she sings to her Telegram flock like a canary one once a month.

And Theron lies part of the problem ,those fireside chats have done sweet FA for market sentiment because of the tiny audience.

Which should be food for thought for those of you who are part of that TG group. You are part of the SP problem by accepting that medium for your updates over coherent & meaningful comms to the wider audience.

For all the good it will do I have written to the business today and voiced my concerns ,no doubt to be filed in the dustbin ….🫤

Brian Hahn wasn’t head hunted , two companies merged and he was surplus to requirements , he had been comfortable for the last 15 years working for a nano cap - he was “ available” which dispels the well worn theories of some NASDAQ big hitter coming in !

that coughlin & chilton choose to conduct a cosy pr relationship with a select 400 member telegram group whilst ****ing a snook to the wider market is an absolute disgrace ! is it any wonder the sp is on it ar$e

Crazy valuations exist on every company BB and are by no means exclusive to this one, with those valuations being pumped by the minority.

The handbrake on valuation here is well known, with the DX completion seeming to be down the lane a little, no doubt signposted by the GSA closing.

On the subject of that short, it has always irked me that they clearly have the ear of someone in the know to have maintained it for so long, but when one sees how our CEO & Chair are so loose-tongued, it surprises me there isn’t more than one company shorting the business

Pantheon have a someone on the BOD as a condition of the CLN ....... "Upon conversion the Lender will enter into a Management Agreement with the Company under which the Lender agrees to support reasonable recommendations and decisions of the Board"

Its financial speak for we want one of our own on your BOD because we dont trust you , if you were trustworthy and financially competent you wouldn't be coming to us to throw you a financial lifeline