Member Info for big-blue

Looks like there is a stability hovering just above 200. How much of that is fay traders buying in expecting a 10% quckie or pis abandoning the stock to lth? I suspect the slightest word out of place and this will tank much further as the issues are extremly sensitive and traders can be trigger happy.

Is this why there is no follow up RNS or press statement following up on the suden sp drop or due to all the questions being thrown at the company?

Always look for what is missing. Silence is not golden for this gold miner!

"thats the fundamental problem they want lower entry "

$500 punt at <50p a share, maybe..

"The stat is something like 70% of investors who trade lose money"

That's for CFDs

It is SO facinating. Once control was gained over the moderators deleting almost by default any condridictory voices or difficult question posted, the posters with subscriptions dissappeared leaving the abuse of the reporting system to a boiler room of rampers some months ago. I even noted it over recent weks outloud.

Now the 'cat is out of the bag' and control of the narrative is lost, it is clear the moderators are no longer playing along. It is open season to all opinions again. And so subscriber posters sudenly return. If only a free open discussion had been alowed before, this blatent pump and dump - especially on the 25th, may not have caught out so many innocent pis.

It would make an interesting class action. People following the chat could have expected that the board content be more trusted due to live moderation, as opposed to ADVFN. Does LSE have a case to answer for continously deleting posts raising concerns or qualified points of discussion away from the narrative of the boiler room? If POLY does indeed go under due to 'fatal' conditions [thrice], expect legal challanges.

I hope the reappearence of the subscribers does not result in the moderators relapsing into the pattern seen over much of last year. The forum must be open and available to all views.

The RNS doesn't even mention LSE as an option. It was revealed hours later in a presentation. And nobody found that to bea very dodgy way of anouncing a potential London exit? If the contents of the presentation had been laid out in the RNS, maybe, just maybe the crash would have been limited. This has as much to do with perception of what is being hidden as it is about what is being released (and where). Once trust is lost, the market speaks.

Still trying to catch the falling knife?

It's a bit odd. Subscribers vanished over the last 6 months. Not a post amongst them. The sp tanks and suddenly they make an apearence. Curious.

"primary objective of Company BOD is to maximise shareholder value. "

fiduciary for the shareholders

Something flagged up as a main failing of ESG policy, a policy the company is heavilt touting in reports. The warning signs were there, I did raise the isue but you clever clver people just ha the posts deleted.

"Would POLY sp be higher if it just owned the Kazch mines? If so, then is it better to abandon Russia altogether?
Just a thought............."

The number of times I've been crucified on this board for saying that.... if only this had been done from the start instead of trying to be clever. I have a strong sense from the lack of follow up info from the company, there is something big and nasty on the horizon.

Still no press release or RNS? I see.

Was that me? Just set up a new computer system at home (oops!). Wow this modern kit is fast, wahoo....

Nobody has said they 'have' to respond. You have made up the assertion that that is what I said.

Now correct your error.

Who said they 'need' to? Nobody. Why then try and stir up trouble with false and misleading statements?

It is a fact many companies make some sort of statement when their sp makes sudden significant movements. If they don't, the question arises why not.
Stop trying to cause disruption and ill feeling.

And still not a peep out of the company in response to share price movement.

A very loud silence.

What about the 'fatal' scenario references kwacker? Thrice! If you read between the lines......

Normally I don't lament on missed opportunities, but I am frustrated with myself getting an 8:02 sell quote for 333 but letting it pass thinking thing would remain steady up to a March ramp up with wild speculation about dividends to be announced. Perhaps I shouldn't be too relaxed and laid back about these things. It may only be money but... ahhh whatever. Lunch beckons and I broke even. Setting the price alert on the app for 99p lol.

We've all been caught by this sort of thing before and learned. This BOD ultimately has behaved no different to the AIM BODs that routinely screw over shareholders. All your faith was placed in one name in particular who may have been a good decent honest fella. But there is a full board to consider. The original split idea has been dragged out so late the option is no longer viable. It should have happened quickly early last year. Those pumping against the split have now seen the outcome of delay, now painted into a corner with few viable non fatal options. That's where it is now. Maybe you will come up roses in the KZ dessert, maybe one of those fatal scenarios will sink the business (with a little assistance from dark forces who will happily nationalise the assets and fill the Kremlin coffers). Who knows. Your risk.

Here we go again. The cabal round on a single poster for vengeance. I expect most can now see through it so you might as well give it a rest.

Surprised there has not been an RNS or even press release.

Drop was what, 24% yesterday, currently another 20% today. But no comment on share price movement or clarification of statements that may have led to such big movements?

I wonder if the exchange has been in touch asking whether the company would like to voluntarily suspend whilst clarifying apparent misconceptions.

Few A trades. Never a good sign when the computers stop trading.