Member Info for big-blue

You equate the brutal murder, rape and kidnap of women and children with ephemeral non-contact, non-violent reactions to Russian manoeuvreing? Russia kicked this off in 2014, has been pushing forces at borders provoking reactions.

Russia had an open door after the end of the Soviet Union. But under Putin, they have just regressed into a solitary isolated loser state with one big on it's shoulder.

Russia brought everything on itself. It was offered access all areas, and threw it all away. The last act of this sordid decline is very close now. Russia will rot in a sea of it's own pi.ss and sh.it. Don't ask anybody for salvation. It will not be given.

Https://english.nv.ua/nation/russian-attack-destroys-60-000-tons-of-grain-in-chornomorsk-50340282.html

China is getting the message. Putin has contempt for everybody.

Https://english.nv.ua/nation/major-structural-weaknesses-behind-russian-defenses-may-allow-ukrainian-army-to-succeed-50340685.html

chip, chip, chip, cluster bomb, CHIP, BANG, CRASH, WALLOP!

Https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/07/20/7412256/

Oh yeah, this'll help, not!

"answering NATO aggression. "

when and where did NATO commit this aggressive act? NATO has never engaged not threatened Russia ever. NATO is a defence alliance and has no attack mechanism.

You are as deluded about NATO as you are about POLY and the glorious future for the Russian Empire and new world order.

You're getting the sh.it kicked out of you on the battle field, pushed out of the world markets, isolationist, the few friends turning away on a daily basis, Putin now can't travel even to SA or China for fear of being arrested and you still think POLY is going to suddenly shine and it'll all be over as the world magically blames Ukraine for standing and defending it's own turf.

WHO INVADED WHO?

There is no way to spin your way out. And POLY is only the latest to be hit by the direct result of RUSSIAN AGGRESSION.

You ain't seen nothing yet. Civil war, retaliation, deeper world isolation, collapsed economy, third world status and worse.

You Russians failed to stand up to Putin. You shall pay a heavy price in years to come. This will not be forgotten any time soon.

"It's all due to stupid, insane, ludricors, illegal sanctions by the west"

and why are these sanctions in place?

What you are seeing with POLY out of LSE, 100% due to Russian aggression, is going to be repeated in many many different ways in the decade to come as Russia is further ostracised. And even sooner, their ploy of using grain shipments as leverage and bombing the grain ports simply underlines what Russia is all about, a terrorist state to be shunned like the Taliban, ISIS, Al Qaeda, North Korea and Iran.

1st of August is the first day of the Russian dark ages.

The ULEZ result proves exactly what I predict. Net zero will be made the number one issue in the next general election. Opposition to all the 'environmental crap' is far deeper ingrained than mass media will ever admit. Starmer is digging the hole for labour on climate change. All the Tories have to do is back-peddle on climate change and make it a cause celeb to rail against.

Have you sen the hundreds and hundreds of videos of Russian vehicles being blown up with Russians in, all the dead Russians in the trenches, in the stores as they are blown up, in the aircraft as they smash into the ground? You actually think any video of the realities of war will make the Ukrainians run?

You are literally on your needs begging. The real world truth id to much to bear isn't it.

Your link sums up the great sophisticated Russian propaganda machine perfectly, lol

Some of this rechurned propaganda is getting a little tired. You want to believe all Ukrainians are serfs without two pennies to rub together to suite your bigoted opinion of others you look down your nose at. Even in war, life goes on and there are many large transactions that take place. Many Ukrainians had plenty of money prewar, and assets worth a bob or two.

It scares you these aren't the simplistic people you wish they were, so you construct a false narrative to explain away a reality that doesn't fit your perverse view of the world.

You got troubles in the head mate!

Back full circle to having posts on an OPEN chat deleted, trying to pretend there is no outside world affecting the company in anyway what so ever. Such 'other world' events it seems are so minor it is not worth gauging the trajectory gleaned from opinions.

By the way, why are you all transferring shares again?

"Morrisons is having a 3 months guaranteed lower price period" lol, I think you'll find all the main chains have such reductions all the time, like Asda's never ending 'roll back'. The fact that Sunak only approached the retailers and put the associations of the producers and producers themselves speaks for itself. And Morrisons is a bad example for you since they have their own farms and butchers and produce a lot of their own food. Out of all of the ones who have scope to cut back it is them. The others do exactly as any industry does when confronted with government, doff cap, agree, promise, put up smoke and mirrors and find ways around whatever the diktat was. And what the hell is a free market party like the Tories doing trying to engage in some sort of 70s Labour style price control? Sunak can no longer manage a market than the supermarkets can.

It's the trade associations that need hauling in (oh and a lot of very dodgy producers and suppliers on the continent too, more horse meat)!

"supertax the supermarkets greedy profiteering pigs"

an interesting one that comes around every few years. This is a misdirection narrative. The supermarket margin is well below many other retail business.

Focus your attention on the 'trade bodies' and 'industry representatives', 'trade associations' and 'supply chains'. We all believe we have robust anti-cartel measures and sophisticated investigators. Actually many of the sub-industries are running rings around regulators and local councils are corrupted to the extent many trading standard departments turn a blind eye due to the local employment factor.

Eggs are a very good example. Supermarkets go to strike deals with suppliers, but find the cost, no mater who they talk to, is always the same. It is because mass suppliers are effectively part of cartels organised by egg industry trade bodies who create artificial high gate prices. It's the same with most food stuffs. At the first sniff of inflation increasing, the butter producers literally doubled there gate price overnight but the office of fair trading turned a blind eye.

There is massive price fixing and corruption in food, but it isn't the supermarkets running it. If anything they have kept a lid on it for many years but can't control it while inflation is used by supplier cartels to ramp up prices. The regulators have totally failed to step in and instead go after an easy target, the end retail chains. And all those trade associations egg on the narrative it is the supermarkets to blame hence Newdealz comes on here and repeats the narrative without any critical insight.

This is how net zero, climate change and climate emergencies have ingrained themselves. No critical analysis. Although is has started to happen off air.

https://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/

Check out the list of signatories on this (out classes the IPCC 2:1) and then ask why this isn't aired?

So let us examine JN's link.

First thing we find is this message.

"

Public opinions and social trends, Great Britain: 11 to 22 January 2023

Social insights on daily life and events, including the cost of living, working arrangements and well-being from the Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (OPN).

This is not the latest release. View latest release"

A perfect example of how propagandist seek to deflect and control narratives. This is not the latest release. Pathetic JN.

Following the 'latest link' we find the cost of living dominates throughout the reports. What is adding a considerable cost to households? Energy. A large part of that are green taxes. People are asking, why with all the money spent on wind farms are we not getting even the original proposed cost per kWhr, let alone the cheaper promises? The future costs of net zero then come into view as son as any scrutiny of present net zero policies is examined (something mass media work very hard to avoid), banning petrol and diesel cars by law, all gas boilers to be forcibly replaced, forced installation of heat pumps, even bigger subsidies on energy bills to carpet bomb the countryside with hundreds of thousands of useless wind turbines, massive costs forced on building insulation forcing many companies to go bust, most landlords to stop renting forcing massive homeless crisis, routine collapse of the national grid over loaded by the few EVs only the very rich and privileged will have and the list goes on and on...

Net zero will absolutely be the number one vote deciding factor at the next election. The cost of it and associated economic suicide can not be covered up. There is one election left before the hugely destructive ban on ICEs. Europe has already turned on that policy, in the UK that Starmer idiot has wedded himself deeper to it with a ban on North Sea oil. To win the next election, all the Tories have to do is repeal the net zero bill (it wasn't even voted on so no issue there).

Net zero actually has little to do with 'global warming'. It uses something called a 'climate emergency' as a vehicle to impose a socialist/Marxist doctrine on society using fear as the principle device. Net Zero started as a European policy which has been forced on the UK with no public consent and has become a definable cult induced to a level of mass hysteria taken up within societies but only where control of the narrative can be achieved with resident sympathisers with the political left within mass media. So you end up with total mass media narrative control in the UK, partial control in the US and a big fight in Australia. Net zero madness is slowly unravelling and the consequences of net zero are reaching people despite a DPRK style news suppression. The cost of net zero is causing increasing economic damage and whether or not future ons surveys at the time of the next election state the number one concern as just the economy or the net zero impact on the economy is irrelevant. One more extreme high cost energy winter and the direct link to net zero policies and increasing poverty and lower disposable income will be impossible to cover up anymore (as is increasingly the case now) and the key critical declaration in the next election will be renouncing and repealing net zero. It's already happening all over Europe, it is now openly talked about in printed media even in the UK directly contradicting TV media, the moderation suppressing it has been lifted from many social media networks, there is open revolt in academia at the out right fraud and deception with the so called science of climate change and the consequences of the stupid folly virtue signalling policies like fracking bans are plain for everybody to see in their energy bills. Net zero IS the economy - the lunatic economic suicide of net zero is being exposed daily and will be number one issue by the next election, whether the BBC and ITN like it or not.

I thin B W was announcing he was stepping down as an MP, like a lot are doing now in order to give their constituency associations time to select new candidates ahead on the elections next year (which will be completely dominated by an 'end net zero' campaign).

He made a coc.ky remark about the way the constant requests for a wider range of weapons has become routine, but then again Ukraine has been put in that position of repeated requests due to the drip drip supply policy. And the remark was also aimed further afield to allies who also try to be big important (Europe) trying to issue supply order diktats as if other nations are submissive serfs. Britain and the west have no input or control of Ukraine's independent actions, as this comment indicates, despite what the Kremlin say.

Https://uk.yahoo.com/style/russian-general-outburst-earthquake-vladimir-103604429.html

Maj Popov, off he pops in to retirement and out of the 10th floor window.

The final straw had to go to a name the satirists could handle, and so here he is.

Ukraine is about to unleash a hellish major assault, Papa is recovering in the field hospital and the inner world of the Kremlin is collapsing all around Putin.

Popov's pop at the high brass is viral inside Russia along with the hacking of state TV broadcasts, (more to come). Russians are going to get a taste of their own medicine.

Those main roads out of the big cities are rather busy aren't they?

Bout time I had a look at this Tabys.

Its an app.A smart phone app for online trading. One of four.

Competitive landscape of TABYS

TABYS has 4 active competitors and it ranks 4th among them.

3 of its competitors have exited.

Overall, TABYS and its competitors have raised over $0 in funding.

There are no private Unicorns in the entire competition set.

Which are the top competitors of TABYS?

Plus500 - London based, 2008 founded, Public company

London Capital Group - London based, 1996 founded, Public company

GMO-Z.com Trade - London based, 1997 founded, Public company

4th out of 4. But it gets better,

Tracxn Score

17/100 What is this? (What is this?, bloody awful is what that score is)

What is Tracxn Score?

MyAnalyst avatar

Written by MyAnalyst

Updated over a week ago

Tracxn score’ is a Proprietary score based on Company's standing against other companies. Tracxn score is composed of four metrics: Size Score, Execution Score, Growth Score, and Team Score.

Tracxn Score broadly covers attributes like founder’s profile, funding raised, type of investors, peer recognition, growth achieved & market potential of the companies etc. It assigns significant weight to growth, innovation and quality of execution in order to identify breakthrough companies

Each of these aspects determines the company's position in the Tracxn scoring on the basis of the predetermined percentile score, assigned to them internally.

The percentile score for each metric is determined using the following formula:

Percentile for a metric = Total number of companies with equal or lower metric value / Total number of companies curated on the Tracxn platform.

Chip. chip, chip