Member Info for Biffadog

IC is not the bloody gospel. They get it right and they get it wrong and just for good measure they sit on fences too.

Not anywhere near as bad as TMF though. Most on here could write a more informed article on HUR than those monkeys.

GLA.

NigWit,

What is wrong with you ?

You ramp the fuck out on NANO day in and day out. Not a day goes by when you don't post numerous ultra ramping posts about a company that is a long way off from being a guaranteed winner. It could go either way.

You then have the cheek to come on here with the express intent of undermining a share that you have no financial interest in. Again your are incessant. In fact you are the biggest poster on both the HUR and NANO boards of late.

The interesting thing is though, for a company with HUR's potential, we simply do not have anybody who ramps the share day in and day out like you do over on NANO.

In fact, we don't have any big time rampers over here and that's a good thing as they are as bad as the people that deliberately deramping a share.

Naturally, most posts are positive as most posters are invested in HUR.

Negative posts are also welcome. What's not welcome is deliberate deramping of a decent company and BOD because that is what you are doing. Please give it a rest.

I think I speak for the vast majority of posters on here in saying we have had enough of your posts. I'm sure we all get the points you have made but invest in HUR because we disagree with the influence these factors will have over the timescale HUR can deliver a great return in.

I would love to meet you after the AGM in June. Please don't be shy and say hello in The Goat afterwards.

GLA.

Again, I rest my case.....

GLA.

I think you misunderstand MCB55's post.

It doesn't take "days" to flow stable oil. He's not saying that. Whilst it may only take 12 hours to reach 10k bopd stable oil flow, it will however take 50 days to reach 500k barrels at 10k bopd and warrant a tanker off load. The capacity of the AM is 600k barrels.

GLA.

Foresight,

Not sure your definition of FOIL is correct.

I think Cebo has it right and this is backed up by what happened with the PMO Catcher project. The first tanker off load was quite a few weeks later than FOIL. Fact.

Not that this is a big issue in the greater scheme of things.

GLA.

Classic example of why it doesn't always pay to trade in and out of a stock for a penny here and there.

Our good friend "thestreet" sold out last Wednesday at 45.3p on a tranche he bought at 47p and now it would cost him 48p to buy back in.

So on the 215,848 shares allegedly traded, that's a loss of £3669 on the way down and a further £5827 if he was to buy back in at 48p.

All figures supplied by the man himself.

Nice work. Lucky it's all just fantasy I guess, or it could get seriously expensive.

GLA.

NigWit,

I agree, that is your absolute right.

Just bear in mind that I have the same rights too and will also post where and when I want.

That's it over here for now. Over and out......

GLA.

NigWit,

Incessantly posting about global warming and the demise of oil on an O&G company BB is not going to make you any friends. You have been posting such comments non-stop for the last 5 days on the HUR board.

Please cease and desist and you will find tranquility will resume on both boards.

We had all quite simply had enough of you.

GLA.

Still waiting for the hard proof behind the Apple rumour NigWit continually perpetrates on here......

GLA.

NigWit,

Just glanced back at your posting on here.

It's incessant. There is other word for it.

However, one thing is quite clear. NANO look very much like a jam tomorrow operation and my worry would be a cash call cannot be too far away as they seem to struggle generating an income stream.

The BOD are a bit economical with the truth on occasion, that's for sure.

Just my opinion but that's the way it looks having taken a cursory look at the current state of play.

GLA.

NigWit,

Please go and join Greenpeace and stop pretending to be an O&G investor as the hypocrisy is driving me mental.

GLA.

Cebo,

Your memory serves you correctly.

pijoe1212 was a complete tosser.

In actual fact, he’s still being one on his sad twitter page.

Just another who used to post purely to suit his short term position.

No loss to the honest punter, that’s for sure.

GLA.

Nigwit and Albi1 (one and the same),

Just got back in from doing the garden and see you are still banging on about the imminent demise of oil.

Your motives are clear and it would be much appreciated if you gave it a rest.

This is an O&G company BB and the vast majority on here have an investment in HUR and think that a company in as good a financial position as HUR, with assets to match, are on the cusp of something rather tasty.

You cannot possibly be invested/SB long and keep on posting as you do. Please do not pretend this is the case as it insults most people's intelligence. I can only assume you are looking for a better buy in price, have missed out here previously or that HUR bit you on the way down back in 2017.

I'm surprised at your point of view, as your mate RB over at CA seems to have bought into the HUR story / timeframe in no small way and we all know he can do or say no wrong in your fluttering eyes.

The points you make are simply not going to have a significant detrimental effect on HUR's prosperity in the near term and that's all most of us are interested in.

GLA.

Having reflected on the posts so far over the BH weekend, I can only conclude that my investment in HUR is well and truly fucked and will indeed sell up on Monday. It's a real shame, as I though we are on the cusp of something big.

In my haste, it would seem that I have totally overlooked the seismic change in government antipollution measures, renewable energy and the use of oil the next couple of years. More fool me.

Don't know why the HUR BOD are bothering with GLA or GWA for that matter. Total waste of time and effort.

I will enlighten them at the next AGM in June.

Thanks for putting me straight guys.

GLA.

Albi1andthesameNigwit,

Relax guys.

HUR prove it up and trade sale. Stated aim of BOD. Plenty of scope for a nice return on this basis.

Suggest HUR not one for you boys judging by your level of concern.

Thanks for sharing though.

GLA.

Alibi1,

You are flogging a dead horse.

Come back to this in a few years time if you wish but I think you will find we will all have long departed this BB with a nice profit way before then.

The only valid point is that a lower appetite for O&G shares (if that trend indeed establishes any traction) may well take the edge off the potential profit value of 2P reserves but no more than that.

On the other hand, massive lack of investment could well see the exact opposite occur.

Maybe you should get out of O&G investments and look to renewable energy companies. Just a thought.

GLA.

Albi1,

I think the reason "it didn't quite happen" is that this is a BB for an oil company and not a green environmental site.

Most on here believe that there is plenty of scope for fossil fuels in the foreseeable future and certainly plenty of scope to make a few quid out of HUR in the next one, two or three years.

Your point that investment managers may shy away from investing in oil companies is valid but whilst the demand for oil is still there in force and oil companies make good profits, I wouldn't worry too much.

This does not have a meaningful effect on anybody's investment in HUR as the timeframe is simply too short to make a seismic difference.

I will add as a caveat that it will obviously could take away some potential profit but it's not going to wreak havoc on your investment in HUR.

Why don't you focus on all the positive stuff HUR are doing as it's much more interesting than a shoddy attempt at scaremongering. Nigwit would be proud of you !!

GLA.

I can’t be bothered to check if it was within the 15 minute window on LSE but you must surely have L2 anyway if you are even half serious about this.

It costs very little. Even I have it with IG.

GLA.

thestreet,

You must be the only one in the dark on here, as I think the rest of us are pretty well briefed as to exactly what HUR are doing at the moment. Plenty of info out there including company presentations, interviews, press articles and CPR.

21 days estimate for the initial commissioning work and not FOIL. Get your facts straight.

For somebody that never gets it wrong, your last fantasy trade, buying at circa 47p and selling this morning at circa 45.3p, made you a fantasy loss of about £3669 on said 215,848 fantasy shares. I guess you picked that one out as it looked quite meaty. I wonder who's trade it actually was.

I have never known a serious trader to post their trades on a BB. Says it all really.

I guess feigning a loss now and then gives you some credibility with the gullible.

I actually agree that the SP could drop back slightly from where it is now but on the other hand it might not. Neither you or I know.

The only thing for sure is that your agenda is not honourable.

I'm not sure why anybody entertains you on here and I wouldn't normally waste time and energy commenting on your posts but this one was pretty low even for you.

GLA.

IJWT,

That would suit me just fine within that time period or happy to wait longer for a higher reward.

As I say, it's out of our hands so why worry given we all agree that a significant profit is in the offing.

I still think Kerogen will stay the course but only time will tell.

GLA.