RE: Quiet3 Jul 2019 15:28
I'm still here and still invested in HUR.
I have just got fed up correcting ill informed or deliberately misleading posters on here and have decided to leave it to others to do, if they so wish.
The CMD will provide much needed clarity of both the Lancaster EPS and the GWA drilling campaign thus far. I just hope the attendees ask the "right" questions but I won't hold my breath on that one.
The 1 July RNS clearly stated that "Lancaster EPS production operations remain in-line with guidance".
The EPS is the key. Providing the EPS proves up as expected, then HUR will deliver shareholder value even if GWA proves unsuccessful.
WD was a big disappointment but not a "duster" as was claimed on here. They hit oil for starters and I'm sure they learnt a fair bit about the geology at the same time.
It is absolutely critical that the Lincoln well delivers or serious question marks are raised over the GWA as a whole. As an investor (not a geologist) I was disappointed when HUR chose to drill WD first but understand why they did so.
Personally, I think the COS at Lincoln is much higher and hope that the well planners and drillers have learnt from any mistakes made at WD, as I think there might have been one or two.
If the next two GWA drills fail for any reason, then it's going to be a long, cold wait for the EPS to prove up FB (WOS).
That's my lot on here.....
GLA.