Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Just looked in and thought there might be something interesting

But it's just more of the same lying and aggressive nonsense from our man in Baghdad/Saudia/Essex/Norfolk polluting the board to detract from a good new partnership

No Kat I don't include Tan and Bai. Good to see you admit Agne isn't the only member of staff and that is yet another thing you got wrong.

The net operating loss for the half year was less than half a million dollars, which equates to c80k dollars per month, so your £125k is complete nonsense and not for the first time. So you don't think they were spending on mica in H1. Just comical.

Where are you getting 24 months from for the Semnet case. Most Singapore civil cases don't go to court and the vast majority are resolved inside 12 months

Why are you still posting here when you said you have no intention of ever investing

Or is that something else you have got wrong

Still trying to make back your mega loss southcoast

More than a little sad

Whatever the sp does you will still own no shares

I doubt it Iis will pay any attention to the retail price.

Plain daft that MMs take it below the placing price

It's going to be the July update before we get a true update on performance I think

Meanwhile we keep seeing the sp held and more large buys appearing.

Smacks of order filling.

Larger investors won't pay more than Hainan did. And MMs will bend over to help them

Meanwhile Bloggs is clearly sore because his buddy is polluting other boards

Is it bland southcoast

Or is the kind of statement any business has to follow through once it has put it in a trading update

I'd say it's the latter.

They have already said they will release initial results in March

Is that another of your wrong statements southcoast

Is that your target to buy bigdaddy

Yep no need to post again, ever, then Kat.

It's a shame your last post is as inaccurate as the rest.

So let's just do a couple of examples.

1. The last time I checked there were 6 employees in Lithuania, not the one you state.

2. There were 4m dollars cash and cash equivalents at the half year and net cash outflow was less than 0.5m. Do the maths Kat, how long a cash runway does that give?

3. Why would the court case be a bad look wrt Mica. It's a separate business that GSt doesn't fully own and has no bearing whatsoever on the Mica criteria.

I could go on but I think others will get the gist

Good to see Billy, that sounds a good partnership

Nope Chaebol, as I stated your AI failed to come up with any real grounds for them countersuing.

The sale is too recent for any allegation of mismanagement and GST are major shareholders not exec management

And a counter claim to force another arbitration is plain daft given they have welched on the original agreement

I very much doubt this will ever get to court and will be settled for over the 1.8m

Kat holders will discuss something they have an interest in. That is natural.

People who have no cash interest spending hours a day trying to talk down something is far from natural and can have no positive intent by definition

So your AI doesn't give you a reason why they would counter sue Chaebol.

How do you think them agreeing and arbitration settlement and then welching wil play out of it gets to court

Well southcoast called that the company would be suspended mid August last year, would be in admin before the AGM and claimed that Burnley was staying open with all the staff retained

So I guess he isn't mystic meg after all

Still waiting for you to explain the grounds on which they would counter sue Chaebol.

If the former directors thought they had a strong case, why would they agree to arbitration and then back track on the outcome

Ps Chaebol I'm surprised your AI hasn't told you that concert party only really applies when there is an element of significant control or a take over attempt

So sad that the majority of posts here are from people with no investment and trying to scare others into selling

So by your own admission adderblack they haven't taken any money out from incentive schemes as they have never paid out

So what are you talking about

What bonus scheme are they benefitting from adderblack?

The growth plan is based on share price, nothing else.

Come on Chaebol, on what grounds would they counter sue.

If they had a strong case, they would never have entered into arbitration

Not true at all adderblack

The incentive plan is based on SP

By diluting they make achieving the incentives harder.

And Kamani isn't included in the incentive plan anyway

Strange adderblack you haven't posted here in months

Must have forgotten which of the many logins you are using