Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Keep it simple Chaebol. Vast and significant are in no way equivalent.

Why would anybody ever try to insist that they are . Why would that person continue to make themselves look increasingly stupid just because they are unable to accept ever that they are wrong.

Not going round in circles with you Chaebol, I value my time more than you do yours.

And still the same problem, it's yet one more example of you telling lies and never able to admit that you are wrong Chaebol.

Well we have now hit a new low in stupidity. Well done Chaebol. Let's do a simple comparison Chaebol. An Ocean is vast. The Bristol Channel has a significant tidal flow. Is that simple enough for you Chaebol

Chaebol

Posts: 11,183

Price: 0.375

No Opinion

RE: They have a month to deliver the reapplication rns...Today 15:26

Leew, vast/significant same thing.....

Further information doesn't necessarily mean full of errors Chaebol.

Only an idiot would make that mistake.

Out of over 100 applications only 13 have been formally rejected

Kat you obviously fail to understand what an iterative process actually means

Why are you posting this nonsense information non stop today.

You and your buddy really need to look at your life choices

Laverda in reality anything above 5% works

Not sure why anybody thinks flotation could be 5 years away

No they don't Kat

They have already said they will do it

It's not a back to first principles application. It's an ongoing iterative process

Why are you wasting your and everyone else's time with this continual flow of misinformation

You don't own a single share

Website visits to brands are improving, which would indicate sales can improve.

Yes Leew kat and Chaebol between them are averaging over 50 posts per day between them at the moment I'd guess.

Time is far more precious than money

Think everyone will agree that if MICA were successful this would multibag and, if it wasn't the price would... lose another 30-50%. on that basis

Market cap is almost at net assets, so I don't think anyone would agree at all. Apart from Chaebol, mouse and a couple of others

You have spent the entire day here so far

Why

And w

You don't need to hazard a guess at the assets Kat

Net assets are in the accounts

It's one of the reasons to buy, so go have a look

Kat maybe you should do a quick summary of all your, Chaebol, supermouse et al's posts and I'm sure they will come to way more than the people you call rampers.

Maybe that is what you should be apologising for

Clapa Bernard also states that they are now getting better quality ore for processing

Where will it finish, who knows tbh

The simple fact is that Hainan are happy with whatever we are producing at the moment.

So unless spod price crashes it's a non discussion tbh

Let's see where we are when second quarter results are produced in July

Sadly for you Bloggs some of your posts remain on your profile after they are removed from the chat board. So here's one example . Try telling the truth Bloggs. I haven't reported any posts today

JoeBloggs28

Posted in: KOD

Posts: 1,780

RE: Spod gradeToday 10:40

Bad, Lav is trying to be clever. Currently it's the C1 costs that is in effect = $561/t as opposed to aisc $647/t = $86/t diffence in fs. Considering grade and recovery are through the floor it makes little difference. Your point still stands

Bluepanther there may be more selling than buying, maybe not.

There certainly isn't the "relentless selling" you were referring to.

So why post it

Newuncle

Show me one post where i have abused or personally insulted anyone

It's strange how you have never commented on Chaebol continually name calling, goading and attacking investors

Is there any reason for that omission?

Grade is through the floor is it bloggs

It's a perfectly acceptable grade and Hainan are happy.

Steve hasn't quit, he is a non exec. If he needs to contribute more, I'm sure he will. Meanwhile there is an entire in country team managing the operation. Which, per Bernard's latest video, is all working well

And you accuse others of ramping.....

Just how would you define what you do. The answer is obvious

What are you on about Arthur

My comment was about the frog

Don't bother starting another thread to reply

He would have to buy some shares first

Last week's volume was 45m, which at the moment is an average week. By historic standards it is small volume

So where are you getting this supposed relentless selling from

Isn't all this just the uninformed rantings of someone who is trying to talk the sp down