Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Definitely before i was even thought of Daz, let alone born. Dave Prowse though i do remember as the green cross code man before he went to the dark side!

I guess Tonka toys is a bit of an age watershed thing.

As toys they were massive in the 80's. Well actually they were quite small but you get what I mean lol

Debenhams spin off I think Reardonz that's his game I think

Blackfox, good post, Frasers won't be buying Boo, I'd guess there is an opportunity to sell Misguided via Debenhams but it's such a toxic brand I'm not sure Debenhams would go near it.

I'm also not sure about the laser focus on young females. That would seem to discount Boohooman, Karen Millen and Debenhams

Onwards and upwards from here hopefully

Toffers as posted before, even the article you posted states that companies don't sell personal data they sell targeted advertising

Anyway i think the subject is exhausted

Especially when you see the trolls trying to disrupt an otherwise polite and sensible conversation with their usual abuse and bile.

And yes Hexam the troll community includes you. Unable ever to criticise a troll post but jump on anybody remotely positive

And then you state that you don't play those games.

More than a little strange

Toffers you still don't get it

Even the article you posted states this

Even though companies like Facebook and Google aren’t directly selling your data, they are using it for targeted advertising, which creates plenty of opportunities for advertisers to pay and get your personal information in return.

The simplest way is through an ad that links to a website with its own trackers embedded, which can gather information on visitors including their IP address and their device IDs.

Advertising companies are quick to point out that they sell ads, not data, but don’t disclose that clicking on these ads often results in a website collecting personal data. In other words, you can easily give away your information to companies that have paid to get an ad in front of you.

If the ad is targeted toward a certain demographic, then advertisers would also be able to infer personal information about visitors who came from that ad, Bennett Cyphers, a staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said.

For example, if there’s an ad targeted at expectant mothers on Facebook, the advertiser can infer that everyone who came from that link is someone Facebook believes is expecting a child. Once a person clicks on that link, the website could collect device IDs and an IP address, which can be used to identify a person. Personal information like “expecting parent” could become associated with that IP address.

“You can say, ‘Hey, Google, I want a list of people ages 18–35 who watched the Super Bowl last year.’ They won’t give you that list, but they will let you serve ads to all those people,” Cyphers said.

Selling targeted advertising space is nothing like selling actual personal data

In fact Toffees, here is the link to Boohoo privacy policy, stating all the things they use data for.

Selling it on isn't one of them

https://www.boohoo.com/page/privacy-notice.html

No Toffers I'm not, because as you say it depends on express and unambiguous consent., which isn't gathered when companies do standard permissions

In fact virtually every website I've seen specifically states that they will never sell personal data.

And it's selling data, specifically when a company is bought out of admin that we are discussing here

Quite simple daytrade go and read a few privacy policies on a few websites. It might be a bit difficult for you, given you seem to have the intellectual and emotional intelligence of a six year old

Toffers as I've said it relies on consent and that consent is rarely if ever asked for.

It certainly isn't asked on behalf of a third party taking over a business from admin.

Yes Toffees, here is the relevant bit to this discussion

obtain valid consent, an individual must take a positive action to confirm their consent, based on a clear understanding of what they’re consenting to.

So for Ted Baker, or Boo in a takeover positive consent would need to be expressly given.

Which I doubt it is now

Oh daytrade wrong again on so many counts

Toffers is female, you owe her an apology

Second in your own two horse race says it all

Toffers you don't get the point about express permission. You certainly don't get the point about transfer of rights.

Each to their own, but firstly a bid won't come imho but if it did 60p wouldn't even reach shareholders

Man child still involved in his imaginary battle with people who think he is a fool

So sad

Going to admit you were wrong when you were gloating a few days ago about not even BIg MIke being interested in buying any more daytrade. When some of us were saying he was mid purchase.

For someone who considers himself a perennial winner, you don't half lose a lot. Second place in your own two horse race daytrade?!

Bon Scott you need shares to vote on anything.

Kamani bought at £2.60 from memory, so he is going to let his lifetimes work go for 40p

You are just embarrassing yourself

Oh dear Bon Scott, just whose strategy is that?

Just the dumb product of an uninvested troll mind.

Is the Kamani family going to sell their 20% stake for 40p

The answer is obvious

That's exactly my point Toffees, people need to expressly tick the box to give permission now.

I very much doubt it Ted Baker permissions, or Boo's for that matter, give express permission to sell data on to third parties by somebody purchasing the company

60p won't fly, we are looking at £s if anybody wants to make a serious offer for Boo

Looking at the trading ranges, it'd clear that Ashley has been buying in the 33-35p range.

He is likely still buying

No way Ashley is looking at Fraser's buying Boo imho. I still think he will be looking for a partial spin off of Debenhams and then he will open stores.

Anybody who wishes to buy Boo will be looking in the pounds not the pennies

Toffers I believe you are a lawyer?

In that case you should be aware of GDPR and although customer data is massively valuable, it can no longer be sold willy nillly without the customer's express permission

And, as I've posted a few times as well, I still think his end game is a partial spin off of Debenhams