Member Info for Bfdinvestor

I wonder if todays fall is to facilitate shares into the US market

Capability Pete, I think you misunderstood me

For the likes of me and Jules who have been here for ages, success this calendar year is still a get rich slow outcome lol

I see you are still posting lies about volume Chaebol

I'll ask you again. If volume died as you keep claiming, why was volume on Friday significantly higher than on Tuesday

You don't have a clue what the registrar has said Chaebol

Reported again for false and misleading information

So no apology for the weekends lies, no sign of any form of humility, just a rehash of more of the same.

I wish admin would do something

I've no idea what the Kung Fu fighter is posting but I'd guess he is misunderstanding the role of an AGM.

In the UK there is no prescribed format for an AGM. So there is no need for the accounts to be presented at the AGM. They do need to be presented at a general meeting and approved. Usually the two meetings are rolled into one but they don't have to be.

I'd far rather they delayed the AGM and did both at the same time. Plenty of companies delay the AGM and I've never seen any form of punishment

I'd guess this is one more example of Bernard sticking scrupulously to the rules, so fair play to him

You told me the they couldnt even file a stay so dont be getting self righteous here BFD

Where did I say that Chaebol. I didn't

You, on the other hand posted dozens of times that the stays had been granted. That, without doubt we were going back to arbitration. That volume had fallen off a cliff due to the news being out. That the two former directors were running a master plan.

What was it Chaebol, a hundred posts over the weekend alone, and probably enough AI generated drivel to write a novella. All of which was completely wrong.

And you still can't admit to any of it

Massive is right, you simply aren't worth bothering with, so that's my last reply until you come up with some new drivel that needs correcting

Why would results being delivered on time erode sentiment badomen. And what erodes sentiment other than bad news

Equally, why is it good news for Bernard, when a separate meeting will be held and there will be no negativity about his remuneration anyway.

It seems you are scraping the barrel now Badomen

I'm hoping it's a get rich slow project Jules, it is certainly seeming more likely as the months progress

And still not a single word of contrition and acceptance that you called this totally wrong Chaebol.

How many people do you think will send your email to GST.

What has happened to those supposed secret sources who told you the stays had been granted.

What has happened to the supposed master plan of the two former directors running rings round GST

Rather than admit you got anything wrong what do you try to do Chaebol? You try to pick another pointless argument

Why not, for once, just do the right thing?

KMUK have six months from the end of the financial year to produce their accounts Badomen. The RNS states that this timeline will be met. So in what way is it bad news.

Personally, I'd rather they delay the AGM and do it as one, but there is no legal requirement for this to be the case

Guys the 9th June is the final date the defendants can file an appeal against the stays being denied.

So it is only a decision point if they don't appeal

I think the wording of the RNS is particularly interesting, especially the awarding of costs and the explicit mention of the direction the defence will be given.

I could well be wrong but it could be the defence is deemed spurious and they will be instructed to settle

And still the ego can't admit he got absolutely anything wrong.

Or apologise for the amount of nonsense he has polluted the board with for weeks

Well I can't see what the wannabe king fu fighter posts, but I'd guess it is even dafter than Badomen.

I agree Compo, any amount that it is deemed Kodal owe will be netted against what Kodal is owed and from shipment revenue.

Let's not forget that the money Kodal are owed seems to be growing each time accounts are produced

Hainan get their 15m back regardless, because they provided a loan

The only dispute is whether Kodal should reimburse KMUK.

Most people don't realise Kodal is owed over 10m dollars by KMUK, with no plan for repayment.

So, even in a worst case scenario, the actual cash impact on Kodal would be negligble

Is that the case mouse?

You seem to forget that the person refusing to answer simple questions is the very same person urging others to ignore the noise that they are creating.

Not to mention the dozens and dozens of posts that have increased our understanding not a jot.

So no nobody is bricking it, other than maybe one poster who has posted far more than anybody else. Why else flood the board?

Bristol Jules, great to see you are still here.

And probably the only shareholder who has ever seen the mill lol

Personally I'd like to see us get back above 5p and establish that as a new floor price.

Tims admitted they arent EMI compliant until 2027

Incorrect Chaebol. The reply TIm made to "Paul" said no such thing.

He stated simply that the regs you referred to wouldn't impact GST until 2027.

It's strange that when you were challenged as "Paul the Investor", you didn't claim to own shares. That has only happened today

Reported