Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Looks like the truth hurts Arthur

Is that why you are now making stuff up

What news caused this to drop below 1.3p

And you were wrong about the large trade yesterday being theeeduke Arthur.

Duke stated he sold £40k yesterday, the trade you allude to was more like £70k

My cynical side is telling me the MM'S raised the price to encourage sells to fill that trade and as soon as they had done so they slammed the anchors on and have yet again killed volume

Your prediction is right yet again?

Wow you are deluded Arthur

Your prediction was 1.2p by the 28th February

Zag you know that a trade of that size will be negotiated off book and will probably have been placed a couple of days ago.

So the price is no guide whatsoever to it being a buy or a sell

Yh I know Billy.

The point is it's just so pathetically transparent now.

It either complete incompetence or greed

Wow that's a complete p1ss take reversal based on absolutely nothing.

CWWX's comments? No southcoast, I'm responding to your post, here it is again. Rather than denial, maybe you could try to explain your BS?

southcoastbather

Posted in: DEBS

Posts: 7,771

Price: 21.20

No Opinion

RE: DebtToday 09:22

I wonder if we are see issues with the current lenders looking at the new ceo and cfo.... They are after all the face of the business.... And with them having no track record being a ceo and cfo.....

The money was loaned with John and Morana at the helm..... Now we have clown 1 and clown 2...

More progress than our iron ore or sp then max.

Seems Moonboy has vanished after his ramp fest

I'm not obsessed about anything southcoast, unlike your obsession with Kamani.

It's simply a mechanism for showing how you post complete BS that you are then unable to back up.

As you have just shown again......

I'm not saying anything of the sort southcoast. And you seem to be avoiding explaining why you believe Finley and Ellis to be "clowns". Which is pretty much what happens every time your BS is pointed out to you.

Ellis was appointed CFO a month or so before kane and Kamani stood down from the subsidiary boards. So April was the right time for FInley and Ellis to replace them. It also shows that Kamani has taken more of a back seat and Finley and Ellis are running the show.

Why else do you think Frasers have gone so quiet southcoast

Boohoo have been refused an extention already previously hence a doing a placing and selling a property at a 22 million loss."

Still a lie that southcoast

Arthur, lets be honest, you are always very limited on here, just not in the way you imply

Some really interesting posts today and then there is the lil ole foxy troll talking to himself!

Quite simple southcoast, as has been explained to you multiple times.

They have been replaced by the two most senior exec directors, Finley and Ellis. So the exec management team are now exercising fiduciary responsibility for the subsidiary reporting businesses. Which is how it should be.

And it shows Finley is now in charge, which doesn't play to your conspiracy theory but may be the reason Frasers have gone so quiet

And still no explanation for why you believe Finley and Ellis to be clowns Southcoast. Just what in their CV's don't you rate?

Still waiting for your explanation of Finley and Ellis as clowns Southcoast?

So

this is what one statement you actually made southcoast

Boohoo have been refused an extention already previously hence a doing a placing and selling a property at a 22 million loss.

Boohoo PLC is incorporated in Jersey, so Companies House is irrelevant in relation to BOO board appointments. Either you are immensely thick or trying to deliberately mislead people as you fail to grasp this.

I guess it's akin to your attempt to mislead people about the status of Kane and Kamani.

Atleast you should atleast understand BOO's corporate structure now and where the PLC is domiciled

No you didn't southcoast.

What you posted, in response to Reardon, implied that BOO had been refused a total extension, which had led directly to the soho property sale and the capital issue.

Which we know is complete nonsense as BOO were looking at disposal of the SOHO property in the summer of 2023.

Still keep posting the complete stupidity southcoast

Talking of which, perhaps you could explain why you believe Finley and Ellis, who both have fantastic online retail CV's are both "clowns"?

As you wish to engage though Crawshaw, maybe you can answer the question southcoast is avoiding. Once again straight from the RNS, is this an extension in date to the original £325m RCF?

boohoo Group has agreed a new £222m debt facility (the "Facility") with a consortium of its existing relationship banking group. The Facility compromises of a £125m revolving credit facility that runs to October 2026 and a £97m term loan that is repayable by August 2025.

Crawshaw zero interest in your pointless interjections.

But just for full clarity.

I stated in response to southcoast's original post that the Italian Bank had refused to take part in the new RCF and had been repaid.

If tyou wish to join in debates which have nothing to do with you, and try to pick your usual pointless arguments, atleast try to post a full picture.