Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Dan is an absolute nobody in the city and he only got the role as he is a puppet - end of story.

Good to see you admit you are telling stories southcoast. It's been obvious for months that that is what you are doing to work your CFD.

I sold some southcoast when the short activity was obvious. I'll buy them back at some point.

They were trading shares so I traded them. Is that too difficult a concept for you.

So let's sum up your position. The CEO is useless, the directors are crooks and the business is on fast track to admin which could happen any day.

Yet you expect anyone to believe that you still hold long shares.

Ps I have you a direct valuation comparison, you provided a load of chart waffle and nothing else

A fifteen percent rise on Friday leaves the sp c20% lower than it was a month ago, so to use one price point in isolation is a little stupid of you King5hott.

What do you think is the reason for this, given the business CEO stated May trading was good

A lot of UK stocks went up on Friday, but not many by 15%

I'm not telling you anything so I'm not sure why you are trying to put words in my mouth.

I tend to look at the market cap here. It's not even 50% higher than the assumed value of Top Shop.

I'd guess people were saying the same about the RR chart a few years ago. I'm not saying this will do an RR, I don't think it will, but all charts at some time bottom and even a lower than average historic trading range would be far higher than where we are now.

Nobody is ever stuck southcoast.

Surely, if you were half as certain of imminent admin as you post almost daily, then you would sell and retain your remaining capital?

More likely you are simply trying to work that CFD isn't it?

Southcoast from a little research, it would seem that Lyttle was brought in because the city wanted a corporate big hitter, which apparently he was.

We now have a new CEO who has a phenomenal online CV.

And he's nearly a decade older than Frasers CEO

Arthur, with your last stupid comment, you obviously don't understand at all.

The log in details will come from their own administrator and be generated in the back end.

So there is absolutely no need for a a registration page on the front end user interface

Hopefully that is simple enough for you

King5hott.

If something has moved up 15% from an historic low, why is it so idiotic to say it has turned?

So let's look at some of your points more closely southcoast.

Does revenue always keep declining.

No, at some point it will find a base point driven by loyalists and new acquisitions. The question is, have we found the base point yet.

Are lower customer numbers always a bad thing anyway

No, not if you can identify loss making customers and get rid of them.

Have website views for the Debs group dropped over the last year.

My take out, without detailed analysis is that, is that the numbers have stayed consistently between 40-50m, with an obvious uplift at key trading points.

PLT rebrand.

Rebrands aren't quick southcoast. I'm guessing the rebrand kicked off as soon as Umar came back into the business. I'd guess when we see them, if they break them down sufficiently, the PLT revenue numbers will be shocking for FY24. But that has no relevance for how the brand relaunch is progressing. My personal view is it still has a way to go and PLT numbers for the start of this FY will be disappointing. But just like you I don't have a clue, but that doesn't necessarily mean they will be worse than last year.

Boohoo man to me seems to be doing OK. The website visits for Boohoo.com for June were a worry, but that follows a statement that May was really good for the group..

Debenhams.com had a phenomenal golden trading period, so it's not surprising that the website numbers have dropped off. What is important in the yoy comparison. Once again I don't have actual website numbers from last year, but I don't recall Debenhams being higher than Boohoo.com.

So it's likely to be a mixed bag imo.

Arthur, in B2b registration will be done by the client company's own administrator, its not like a C2C site where you go and register yourself

No ramping from me southcoast, just a contrary view to the negativity and hostility that makes up most of the content of this board, posted by people who in the main have no investment or are going short.

Debenhams market place grew GMV massively, labels have had a massive fall off in revenue. The simple fact that a low double digit margin revenue from market place sales more than offsets 100% revenue drop from label sales shows how rapidly the market place has grown.

The question is, have youth brands found a bottom. Nobody knows the answer to that question despite your protestations to the contrary

No Southcoast, Debenhams isn't growing very fast at all. GMV only went up 34% in the last financial year. And that's including the fall in label revenue. So market place GMV will likely be up atleast twice that. It's truly feeble growth isn't it. Brands on the site growing from a few thousand to over 12 5k is positively anaemic isn't it southcoast

And a back office gateway, presume you know what one of those is

It's a B2B portal ADog

It's quite simple Arthur

Whilst you keep posting that you were right or nearly right when in reality you were massively wrong, I'll keep pointing it out

It seems to me you are still trying to defend yourself on another thread

So, to be clear, 17% is nowhere near 30% and in Gst terms .95 is nowhere near 1.05

Well I'm guessing that the value of your investment hasn't changed by a penny

Arthur drop the arrogance. 17% is nowhere near 30%

you called it massively wrong, period.

And have you forgotten that you have filtered me?!

Amazing that Crawshaw hasn't yet realised what filtered means lol

Wow the ADog showing his fantastic grasp of maths again.

So 17% is nearly 30%.

So that would mean that £3 is nearly a fiver. I wonder if that will work in the pub

Amazing how trolls can never admit when they are wrong

It's strange that the likes of southcoast and Hexam, who were screaming that there was a leak on a 9% drop are strangely quiet about the possibility when the SP goes up more

And I don't think there has been a leak today either