Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Wolfie why are you blaming the BoD for price action that they can't control.

The AIX broker bought a supposedly significant volume of shares on Aim. All logic says that should push the sp up.

The fact it didnt says more about AIM and why it is screwed than it does about the BoD

It would seem we have the typical AIM nonsense.

Happy to take the sp down when spod falls but do nothing when it rises.

Other than to create a stuoid spread that benefits nobody but themselves

Southcoast nobody posts here more than you do

You are totally obsessed with the Kamanis

Ofcourse you dont southcoast.

No long would post the unremitting negative poison with the frequency that you do

Chef I have never claimed to represent what you are thinking, frankly I couldn't really think of much of a worse way to waste my life.

You have the right to post what you wish, just as others have the right to call out all of the absolute garbage you continue to post.

Southcoast it's strange how you are spending so much time trying to deflect from and rubbish this RNS.

Seems to me it has you and your CFD a little worried

Cheers tangodog

Chef let's be clear

I can only speak for myself and you don't represent what I think.

The interesting thing about the RNS is what it doesn't mention at all.

The recent speculation has been about the non standard finance, which wasn't mentioned at all.

I'd guess because it was subject to NDA

Any revb offer, now that they are in due diligence phase, would be a done deal if it was presented to shareholders, due to Boo founders stakes

It seems quite simple.

Sp is being held to fill massive negotiated buys

Not really a fair market scenario but when was London ever not ran for the big boys

Fed I'd agree refinancing in itself isn't a reason to not publish results.

The reason for the refinancing may well be a good enough reason though.

If the intention is to publish bad historic news in tandem with good future intent, then that would make a lot of sense.

If the Sky news is true, then I'd guess whatever the purpose of the finance is, it would be subject to NDA.

So that would explain the last few months silence

The original refinancing story stated categorically that Boo were negotiating £125m standard RCF refinancing and £50m special purpose lending.

It remains to be seen whether this is the case.

But with this potential lender having previously been in Debenhams, it opens up a whole load of possible scenarios, all of which would be commercially sensitive

I presume UFO didn't participate?

What is our stake in WCE now?

Wow Chaebol back with the fud after he sold out.

These people clearly have no lives.

If the deal structure remains in its original form, then that indicates that Boo don't believe they need more than a £125m RCF.

Given the suspected paucity of the current cash position, then this would seem to suggest that FCF is improving

If we don't know the terms Hexam, why posit that they will be bad.

The original story talked about standard refinancing for the existing RCF and an additional £50m specialist finance, presumably for a specific purpose.

We don't know if that has changed.

If we assume the additional funds are for a specific purpose, then given the potential funder then it is most likely for an acquisition.

If the deal is close then I'd guess the accounts and news will be released at the same time

More delusional fantasy Bon Scott

You should maybe try another log on, this one has clearly gone past it's sell by date

Purchase of Bake and integration will have been atleast 3m dollars.

Southcoast you are confusing yourself for no apparent reason. It was a trading update for the full year including Christmas. Which means we got the full year sales figures. Which is the purpose of a trading update

Not sure why you find that so difficult to comprehend.

Onlyking, surely you don't think the chef has the intellect to read and understand an RNS