Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Who are these big sellers Chaebol, volume is a fraction of what it was last week.

With a near 20% quoted spread what are market makers doing to create liquidity or a market?

Chaebol I think you have been far more inaccurate than Enki over time

It's interesting to see you marrying to re-write your own forum history

I think most LTH's will remember you being called out for a lack of knowledge of the business, not for phone numbers

I'm interested how you work that out Ocean. Actually I'm not interested at all, given it's just the usual rubbish you post

No surprise to see you taking the part of somebody who holds no shares, knows nothing about the business and just tries to abuse other posters whilst hoping they lose money. Sounds a lot like you doesn't it Ocean

It's kind of strange that someone who pretends to be a chef and pretends to hold shares in multiple companies tries to comment about anything real, be it masculinity or any other subject.

I guess we are all annoyed at the sp

however, im blaming the market makers not the board.

It was their decision to nort return the sp to where it was pre-suspension

It was their decision to totally destroy the momentum and the volume

Just look at today, they dropped the sp again based on absolutely nothing and with more buys than sells.

They could have been making money yet they choose to cost everyone else and will look for someone else to blame when even more funds leave UK small caps and go to the US

Totally agree George and good to see the progress being made

Good to see you are admitting you aren't a shareholder

Atleast that's more honest than the other log ins

The £125m RCF wasn't due until October 2026, so unlikely that there was any need to pay it off.

They clearly wanted the extra money, so maybe the existing syndicate didnt want to increase the facility. Part of it is for REVB and I'd guess the rest is to help build DEBS bricks and mortar for beauty

Sleepy, I already limit my responses to what I perceive to be important.

I don't believe that the blatant lies posted by the usual suspects here should go unchallenged, nor do I believe most readers of the board have filtered them

Maybe if more users of LSE weren't so passive then we wouldn't have to put up with the poison posters and the site would be better for all users

The purpose of a discussion board is to discuss things Ocean

The motives of someone who posts but doesn't want his posts discussed are therefore very suspect.

In the last three years the interims have come out end September, early October and early November, so what would your definition of delayed behaviour, given that they can be produced any time until the end of November

Still trying to understand why you are discussing going concern on interims that don't even need to be audited and where there is an RCF that isn't even fully drawn

The question is more why a £400 UT is required

It's just the usual nonsense,much like southcoast's posts

Half year accounts for AIM businesses don't need to be audited Ocean, so why would there be an issue

But putting that aside, with a new RCF recently signed, which isn't even fully drawn down yet, why would there be a going concern issue?

when you say delayed what do you mean.

The earliest the half year update has come out in recent years is the back end of September, but more commonly it is October or November

I see you are expanding your horizons chef.

Posting your poison on the Debs board.

Another business you pretend to hold shares in.

Why bother

If you are constantly disappointed ivenoidea why is this the only board you post on?

Why not go and post somewhere you believe in the company?

Shein have always been a market place, it's why they always talk about GMV

What is interesting is you talking to yourself chef

Why do it

As for JoeBloggs, just like the rest of us, he doesn't know what the actual AISC will be, nor does he know the life of phase one, nor does he know the ability of KOD to raise debt finance

Other than that his analysis is average

So it's kind of a pointless

Oh dear chef bloggs that is embarrassing

Ivenoidea let's be clear

The only person who disrupts this forum and fills it with incorrect and misleading information , at the same time as attacking other posters is the supposed chef.

If you wish to encourage a discussion then maybe position your posts in that way?

Just goes to show the level of education some on here have from what Bfd wrote.

Well chef I'm educated enough to know that a salary of less than £300k per year doesn't equate to £12k per week.

I'm educated enough to know that a director who is presenting at the Q&A hasn't left the business.

You, on the other hand, seems to lack the intellect to understand such basics

So I'venoidea, if you genuinely want to have a debate on here, why title the thread questions for the AGM.

It would seem to be misleading wouldn't it?

And if you want a genuine discussion why ask leading questions and try to cover points that nobody on here can possibly know the answer to?

I'm still intrigued as to why you would expect the company to answer questions that are commercially sensitive and likely subject to NDA