Member Info for Bfdinvestor

The only people throwing around BS are you and the Chef.

Do you think Hainan invested 115m based on a four year starter project

Bad, yes I know but without the cash injection into Kodal the deal wouldnt have got over the line. The $18m into Kodal is the part debatable that Hainan believe they can claim to cover the £15m bill.

Absolute nonsense

So to repeat the question bloggs

If it's over valued why are you here

Because you know as well as everyone else that your "valuation" based on only the first four years of the starter production facility is complete BS

Oh dear Bloggs you embarrass yourself

You really think anybody is going to make an offer, which they expect to be accepted based on the first four years of what is just a starter production facility.

Do you think Hainan invested 114m based on four years

Totally clueless

And why so aggressive, the only person you embarrass is yourself

How are you defining life of mine Bloggs

Is DFC a football club Bloggs.

I have no wish to discuss something you patently don't understand.

As I said any company looking to buy here will look at atleast a 10 year DCF

I guess it is too complex for you

So you first claim companies don't look at future cashflows and now you are trying to quote NPV's

Just what do you think an NPV is based on Bloggs

That's right, it's a form of DCF

Totally clueless

Is it Bloggs, so you think a billionaire agreed to pay £180m for a brand name

If so, you genuinely are clueless

What makes you think AIM is future looking Bloggs

It is far from that.

Companies looking to make acquisitions always look at future cashflows.

It doesn't seem to be a difficult concept for anyone apart from you

Are they bloggs?

Maybe you could explain how Topshop, which had no revenue of its own, no website or shops of its own,was recently sold with an implied valuation of £180m

I didn't realise anybody was on your watch lol

Are you some kind of sheriff in your own head?

Maybe you could explain why, if you believe KOD is over valued, you are still holding shares allegedly

Bloggs I guess you've never worked on any company purchase.

I've worked on double figures.

Every single one has used some form of future cashflow model, all of which are based on discounted future assumptions

Absolute fool

Bloggs that could be the biggest bit of nonsense you have posted so far

Any valuation of KMUK will be based on 10 year DCF model, which would be far higher than the current market cap.

I'm intrigued though, if you believe KOD is fundamentally overvalued now, why would you continue to hold shares

I guess the answer is obvious

No need southcoast, just do a simple Google search.

Highest ever market cap was less than £4.5bn

It never had a £5bn market cap

Clearviews sorry didn't see your question

Can't see any offer coming in at 5p in the next couple of years, we will need floatation plant, a better spod price and clarity on the gold for that kind of valuation

I can see 1.5p as fair offer in the next couple of years.

Rotter the 12 month rule means that anyone offering to buy the company has to offer the highest price they have paid in the past twelve months. Not the absolute high.

Nobody is going to accept an offer anywhere near the current sp. Only idiots who hold no shares would even suggest it

Blue sky and sunlight is the best disinfectant

Yep I don't get why people just don't report the idiots

A few biggish sells, most likely SC, and the typical MM over reaction to make themselves a few quid

No problem nana

I just don't think the lies that bloggs et al post should go unchallenged