Member Info for Bfdinvestor

It's an interesting point badomen.

Bloggs as usual is trying to put words in others mouths that have never been said

Who knows Bloggs maybe you should sell those shares you don't own

Quite possibly the amount received by KMUk is net after running costs of the mine and processing facility

Why not drop Kod an email

Could be a few things in play lorcun

That trade at 24.20 looks like it could be an intraday short

Could be either a background seller or buyer.

MMs seem loathe to move the sp, and a few sells seem to have a far bigger sp affect than buys.

Anyways I'm happy to accumulate a few more pre-christmas at this price.

Yes gold exploration is definitely in the plan for 2026 per the interviews.

The market cap is starting to look completely ridiculous now

It's funny to see the 350 plus post troll now resorting to posting a load of stuff that has never been said

So sad

Congratulations Bloggs you have just passed the 350 posts in 30 days mark.

All on one share that you have nothing positive to say about.

Your life must be so fulfilling lol

Oh it's a great day for me Bloggs

An end to end tested business model, massive resource growth potential in a growing product market, with gold assets we can now move on to.

Not such a great day for you with no shares, more feeble attempts to discredit the CEO and more and more people realising you for the troll you are

You mean royalties which will also be far less now

The figure also includes corporation tax at 25%, which will be far lower based on the current spod price

Nope I've also included the selling costs bloggs

Bloggs if you wish to insult other posters atleast do it from a basis of knowledge not ignorance.

You are referring to the September 2022 study I presume. Perhaps you can explain how this, direct from the RNS, equates to 647 dollars

Incorporating the above key cost input parameters into the operating cost model prepared for the DMSU highlights a C1 (Brook Hunt) operating cost excluding product selling costs of US$436 per tonne of concentrate produced, with an additional US$125/t for selling costs which includes inland transport to the port.

Badomen I think Lav was pointing his comment at ivenoidea, not you, based on his multiple posts about fid in 2027

Badomen the 100m was an equity investment into KMUK not a loan . So it isn't repayable

KMUK loaned LMLB the money to build the facility

Per the KMUK end 2024 accounts, the loan is defined as non current, so not repayable at all in 2025. So part payments back to KMUK will start from January I'd guess

Sure Bloggs it's a terrible RNS

End to end processes tested and working

A piece of bush turned into a revenue generating mine in 18 months

Resource base growing and still open at strike which will undepin atleast a 15 year mine life

Plant fully optimised to hit nameplate production

Bimonthly shipments of spod planned for next year

Price of spod increasing and likely to continue to do so.

Fid on stage two next year and advancing the gold assets.

Obsessive and delusional bloggs

Oh dear Bloggs best sell the shares you dont own.

21m dollars isn't a pittance.

Nothing stinks other than your posting history although the difference in price paid needs to be explained.

Big picture we have gone from a piece of bush to a company generating tens of millions of dollars in a year and a half. We have end to end tested all of our processes and are well set to build on them in the future with a growing mine stock in a growth industry

Most people try to see both sides Bloggs, give it a go

Lol nope that is one thing we are never going to agree on Badomen.

Once we see the regular bimonthly shipments and subsequent regular payments, then that will start to resemble a schedule for me

Badomen read my posts this morning

I have already posted that the difference between 24m and 21.3m needs to be explained.

What I find equally frustrating is the likes of Bloggs trying to disparage management based on a pricing equation neither he nor anyone else on this forum understands. I've stated a few times now that we will only understand the true revenue picture once we are a few shipments in.

Big picture though, this is an immensely positive RNS for the future of the business.

As I keep saying, we dont know the detail of the off take pricing equation

So trying to do granular calculations is pointless, unless you are the likes of Bloggs trying to undermine Kodal management

For instance there seems to be an assumption that the price is based on the date of shipping

It could just as easily be an average across the period. To get a better understanding is going to take a few shipments. But we do need to understand how 24m became 21.3 imo

Ivenoidea give it up, you have zero credibility

Only you weren't Bloggs. Your "lucky to get 800" was the cif in china price

Still can't stop lying or ever accept that you are wrong