Member Info for Bennster

Hi Ignorant.

Nobody can give you advice you should follow - only you know what risk/timescales suit you.
"Gaps galore" is hype speak for "this share will move up in steps, similar to the 60% we saw on RNS day, but repeated over and again till the share price is much higher than now".
It's never to be taken seriously as it's always a ramp by someone who is desperate for an exit price or a quick trade win.
I hold long term because I did the maths on 16.7% of AFN and the belief that the Narni bridge will either do very well for us long term or be sold for a big profit - either way I think I'll gain, but that's just me. Lots of AIM wins are about timing and sentiment and that's impossible to predict correctly all the time.

When I see some solid facts/numbers and business case for a rise I'll believe.

Careful John - you'll burst the hyper monologue from our resident Tintin ;-)

And the worry is we have the Twitterati mucking us about if Zak did his usual chart mumbo jumbo.

I guess Jimmy's sleeping it off today?
Jimmy is a VELA poster - think he's got a bit mixed up.

We got those a while ago simpleinv.....

We made £83k

You're right v2cola - there is a chain reaction, both short sighted and inaccurate, which is not reflecting the value proposition here.
AFN are not a crypto company, and OBC hold 16.7% of that - that alone drives almost all the current m/cap of OBC.
The Narni bridge is a transaction technology, so the value of tokens is largely irrelevant - what matters is the volume and frequency of trades - which the RNS this week demonstrates is taking off big time.
I consider the Narni bridge to be like a forex trading platform but for crypto tokens - it doesn't matter to a currency exchange technology if the dollar rises or falls.....

And how frustrating is it that this share has once again become a catfish share?
Apparently OBC has to bob up and down with BTC valuations - even though we don't hold or deal with BTC, the value here is in the share of AFN and the Narni bridge.......

genuine request: could either of you translate "droped £5k" and why there's an RNS today or in a week or so (which hasn't yet landed?)

Hi Jimmy - genuine request: could you translate this for us?

"mush, igraine, ciz, vela, are all shouting from the hilltops regarding, sgsc( conduit) going american,
its all about adz1656,
and brave heart have a % of it,
rerate inward bound,"
gla

Morning all. Sat here for years, still down, but finally some news that this is moving.
For the newer posters, note that the share of AFN (16.7%) alone justifies this SP - the Narni bridge is effectively valued at £nil hence my ongoing belief we were due this correction and it has more to go.
Low free float helps of course.

Hi Chavi - the truth is well represented between our posts I think.
It may well be that to keep the market afloat and prevent more drops TB agreed to take up some slack from the MM's at a cost price - they could be the "undisclosed seller" in that case.
Starknight is using the transaction to pretend somebody wanted to invest money and therefore it's a raging signal this is going to the moon - that's what I'm trying to explain.

That isn't helpful though is it? We had Zak Mir and his twitterati do this before May and look what happened - quick spike then back we go and a further loss of faith.
No thanks.

You clearly can't read.

Every buyer needs a seller. So I repeat....
If TB bought shares, who did he buy them from? The MM's haven't ever bought enough shares below that price, and wouldn't just give shares to TB for a loss, so TB was buying from an undisclosed seller to prop up the SP.
That's why the share price is unmoved and still close to 8p.

And who did he buy them from genius?
The MM’s haven’t bought that many shares at that price since records began and they NEVER sell at a loss. TB covered a large sell to prop up the SP.
That’s why a director buy had ZERO effect on the SP

It was a SELL. Get over it.
I posted the evidence from that day's trading to prove it.

Remember that raft of bad news I spoke of earlier?
It just got bigger. :-(

You need more than rose tinted glasses tonight

Again- beg to differ - here's the recorded trades for that day.... note the sells at the end of the day at 8, buys at 8.45
That big transaction was just after this list, so a sell.

01-Nov-22 16:14:02 8.00 150,000 Sell* 8.00 8.50 12.00k O
01-Nov-22 15:33:45 8.45 33 Buy* 8.00 8.50 2.79 O
01-Nov-22 13:48:56 8.00 191,000 Sell* 8.00 8.50 15.28k O
01-Nov-22 13:03:11 8.13 10,263 Sell* 8.00 8.50 834.38 O
01-Nov-22 12:47:47 8.125 20,000 Sell* 8.00 8.50 1,625 O
01-Nov-22 10:02:10 8.10 38 Sell* 8.00 8.50 3.08 O
01-Nov-22 09:50:17 8.45 20,000 Buy* 8.00 8.50 1,690 O
01-Nov-22 09:44:19 8.05 64 Sell* 8.00 8.50 5.15 O
01-Nov-22 08:28:32 8.45 1,827 Buy* 7.80 8.50 154.38 O

Appreciate you coming back to correct that - I am happy to have a debate about what I DID post....

beg to differ. The transaction was a sell first time around.
If you look at the trades on the 1/11 you'll see the price falling just before this big one, which was the lowest of the day - it's not an investor buy and never was..... that's somebody offloading to the MM's at a low price