Adrian Hargrave, CEO of SEEEN, explains how the new funds will accelerate customer growth Watch the video here.
I’ve only got one account old boy, and only the need for one as I’m not some kind of weird Machiavellian character getting his only endorphin hit in life from multiple character posting on an investors bulletin board. I don’t normally get involved, but I was just amused at your flip up. Gallows humour eh, you taking coolfree, g-man and all your other split personality alter egos with you? I’ve always been strongly against capital punishment but I’d imagine you’d get a good turn out
Fortunately Ava6000 already uses a very common and well used cancer drug, and we are trialling a new delivery system for the drug. This isnt without risks of failure, but very different to a novel drug.
‘ Presently Omicron is being hyped almost as a new virus. This seems to be quite over the top, to me based on the little evidence available’
You’ve nailed it. It’s due to the little evidence available that we have to view this new variant with caution. Imagine the outrage if it turned out to be horrific to a certain demographic etc. I personally don’t understand why this, to me, basic logic isn’t explained better in the press.
I wasn’t being flippant with my suggestion earlier in this thread, I think the withdrawal of nhs privilege to those unvaccinated, for Covid illnesses, is the most practical way forward. Even it’s proposition would help those with difficultly understanding the repercussions of their actions on themselves and those around them, might stop and think. Of course those that still continued to go down the unvaccinated route would still be able to get medical care if they needed it, but it would be private and they would have been aware of this consequence when they initially went done this path. I see this as the pragmatic way forward for a problem which is going to be a huge issue for governments across the world for years to come. In the months and years to come I’m more likely to forget my top up jabs due to slackness rather than any weird world view, a policy like this would be a decent carrot/stick…
It’s odd they should be specific about nuclocapsid tests, then have that addendum, perhaps it points to a PD boffin who has a hard on for Nuculocapsid proteins and hates the S protein, but others added the addendum because they all hate that particular boffin in the lab
That’s it and at the bottom it says
‘DHSC recognises that it is not possible to predict every possible innovation. If a manufacturer has developed a test with an unforeseen advantage, we reserve the right to review and permit submission for validation if the scientific consensus supports the claim.’
Which kind of nullifies most of sections 1-6
From memory it said in one paragraph
Test should be nucleocapsid
But In a following paragraph it then said something along the lines of new technologies and methods would also be accepted. I know clear as mud leadership from our government once more.
Yep, but you get my point too, a fair chunk of their pollution is only really proxy uk/western pollution. You could even involve a subject close to both our hearts. The carbon footprint for all those innova lfts should have been on our register if only the government had supported our diagnostic industry.. That in a microcosm illustrates how China India etc get painted the bay climate guys, but it to a large extent satiating our need for cheap carp.
We do have to consider all the carp we buy from China on top of that 1%. The Uk loves consuming, but we make precious little these days. Therefore whatever carp we buy to sustain or amuse ourselves from countries that now do our manufacturing I think should go on our quota.. But has little to do with Avacta. Some decent jokes though TEMPLAR