Member Info for ben1093w1

I'd generally look at it though other way. He has put so many deadlines out in the air and completely missed them that his deadline announcements mean absolutely knack all hence why the market didn't react positively

Thread got deleted by looks of it but the other weekend you threw your toys out of the pram and said you was selling

Why do find it hard to believe they are sells? Seen as according to you, you sold aswell?

Wondered how long till madgeys bipolar came back out and he started complaining again

Looks like just a percentage correction to accommodate the recent conversion dilution to holdings change?

What happened to throwing your toys out of the pram saying you was selling

Shouldn't be a massive issue, we know our financials are fairly secure with low cash burn-rate and the ongoing conversions.

also makes no sense to worry about a 36k sell when the SP held firm... as you say probably conversion shares

This only addresses conflict of interest issues with the ZCDC, considering no update I presume the internal matters and cleansing for the local community and community leaders are still ongoing, nothing moves until that is sorted

ORCP is generally a quiet board between the luls of updates

wrong oracle mate

its had more movement in the last week than it has in the last 7 months so probably

Not really or they would have had to state that the application was deferred.... why not take the the RNS at face value? The presentation was required by PPIB process and now that is complete they review everything and move forward. We wouln't probably be in the current price action if all the rampy bois on twitter weren't saying it was going to be signed off Friday when they didn't have a clue. Excellent top up time either way

That fact he owns less than 0.7% of the company he apparently believe's in

Honestly no PI wants a consolidation at this point, it just provides a clean slate to start issuing more placings again, I'd rather be cash flow positive with debt financing in place before even considering that

I agree, the new bridge getting installed on the 18th doesn't put us back 4 weeks unless we was already 2 weeks behind anyway

Where is the one person that comes and says "got to spend money to make money"

Honestly as much as i've criticised AP in the past yet some how justified placings are required to get the mine going, this one feels like smoke and mirrors to be along with the apparently covert finance deal they can't release anything on. Lets look at the facts here;

- We was informed there was an issue with the bridge on the 7th, considering first offtake was due to be taken end of August Early September, one would not be deluded to think this would mean the majority of the offtake required would be already in the flotation processing.
- A few days later we get an RNS with proposed date that the bridge will be replaced, much sooner than the four weeks quoted?
- We have to raise to pay for said bridge....fair enough....why then raise for further mine development if the finance and first offtake are so close. Why punish shareholders when nothing has been delivered? Ah okay, they needed to ensure that next month's wages were in the bank
-What happened to the cash raised to pay atlas off should they convert? Surely its fairly obvious the SP isn't getting close to .24 any time soon so this could have been quite safely used.

"Disappointed to have to go back to the market for further funding" - Complete and utter bull, there is a reason none of the BOD hold any sort of meaningful share stake.

Even better, imagine if the finance deal was with YA

What kind of math is that?