RE: Motley Fool12 Aug 2018 21:59
WellWell , without coming across as pedantic , your argument and posts seem somewhat finagale and contradict themselves somewhat - "we are not flooding the market as such but potentially we might incrementally" ………..- I still do no see how this can be the case unless you agree that we could be producing in excesses of 250mmbd , although in reality , probably a lot more would be needed to impact the POO in such a way is it would be detrimental to any buyer…….. but if, and it is a big big IF that were the case then the £3 or £5 p/s looks like a steal , no matter how much discount you apply...……..
and then you follow with "it probably matters not but any decline in barrel price will be offset by the OIP , I am assuming that you mean assumed bp of reserves , right, and not POO, .........…..... so again my thinking is that if Hurricanes fields can produce enough to negatively effect the POO, and in turn the PPB attributed to ROIP , then we must be talking several multiple millions barrels of ROIP , and for any purchaser to be concerned about it s effect on the OP , incrementally or not , then they must look at it as banked PUD reserves - so several $ per barrel minimum and more ( low teens ) for the PD captured by the EPS on Lanc .
Thanks for your previous replies and communication Wellwell , but some come across as non-sequiur or having a rather byzantine undertone if you may excuse me saying so ---- They are thought provoking which is appreciated - but tend to focus on only the negatives , improbable and at times implausible which in some ways could cast doubt to some investing peeps , like myself , who may be at time naive or may not have a full grasp of the industry ( despite the misnomer ) which may result in a potentially huge upside if MR T and the A team continue to get it right..
Must scoot now - time for a few stubbys and a chill .