Mr. Green_10 Sep 2014 01:12
Sorry I could not accurately answer your question "How much from the 17mill minus current debt is actually available for new drill operations, drilling or acquisitions".
I posed the question from you on ADVFN and received the following excellent reply.
Belgrano
Unlikely you'll receive a response to your question as there isn't a black & white answer.
Let's start with reviewing what we know about the finance deal (from RNS):
"The Facility contains standard commercial covenants for facilities of this nature, including a requirement for the Company to maintain a senior debt to cash flow ratio** of not more than 3:1."
"**senior debt to cash flow ratio are not IFRS defined terms. These are commonly used Canadian E&P lender terms, defined in detail in the Facility Agreement."
Ultimately, the fine print of the facility will provide the true definition - whether they are using future forecasts of cash flow etc
This is where it's not black & white as the cash flow forecasts would increase with a drilling programme but there are production forecasts & commodity prices etc to be part of the overall metrics to be considered too which leaves things down to agreements between parties on what figures can be used.
If we look purely at the Q1 numbers, we generated cashflow of C$1.1m. If that was annualised that gives C$4.4m so a maximum loan availability of C$13.2m (3:1)
However this is purely historical and not much use but just a guide of how it looks in that period using the ratio.
The things that would be in Edges favour when agreeing drawdowns are the fact that there is a de-risked acreage and known producing wells would provide an effective way of estimating production increases based on a defined capital programme. The commodity prices would be based on current forward pricing so that helps transparency too.
All in all, if Edge can deliver a robust, confident set of forecasts then there is scope to release a good chunk of the facility. What makes it interesting is if the funds are used to partly fund an acquisition. That would leave less available for drilling as an acquisition doesn't increase cashflow (unless it's producing - unlikely) So if we do get a debt facility funded acquisition then I'd expect a cautious drilling programme (due to reduced facility available after drawdown for the acquisition) or an alternative source of finance can be found to fund an enhanced drill programme post acquisition.
Brad has guided us to a conservative mix of a capital programme plus acquisitions but is also guiding us to the fact they are still looking for alternative sources of finance to accelerate the capital programme (even after the new credit facility as confirmed in Q1 results)