RE: Tuesday rise11 May 2021 17:25
Hi Mathurin,
Think one thing thats easy to lose sight of here, is what other treatments are on the market and at what cost. Even those ones are not that effective. To produce something very cheaply (such as the one on the current study), it would be possible to combine it with a lower dose of another for more effective treatment at a greatly reduced cost and reduced side effects, from the lower dose of the other treatment, as this one does not give side effects.
Many treatments cost 10X as much with side effects such as steroids give or immunosuppressants .
However I'm actually with you, on this one hoping for much higher effectiveness, if it hits 50% it has immense value, thats easy to take for granted by investors, but will not be missed by the highly predatorial big pharma players who will want it in their arsenal of treatments, because ours will make their treatments redundant overnight. They make billions annually from their products, and have analysts looking at current and potential competition constantly.
Some may doubt it, but wouldn't be surprised to learn of every post on here being read by them. Know for sure that every forum post on the parent company's products (OPTI) is being read by paid employees of companies they have contracts with, as I posted something that was miss construed once and the parent company received an official complaint from the Far East.
They will try to break the IP first, then go for this company next, or both in parallel, because in their shoes I would do also.
That's when the game really starts, and I for one are not going cheaply, and know many other strong holders feel similar.