Member Info for beinthelead

Roll back those expectations…

Yes, agreed.

They’re mental. Suggest you privatise your Twitter feed.

I didn’t say your were RAH. I said I viewed Tom’s as lunacy. Wrong account ;)

You’ve create debate. That for sure. All good in the main. But like always, a load of****** mixed in.

Haha make that 3

Surely RNS worthy??

Why would you be invested for those returns…

TD are useless Luke. Full of holes. They attributed no value whatsoever to data validating the platform on Jan 17th. That’s enough for me.

Luke - you’ve provided your valuation, I and PL have said fair play. Our views differ. Clearly. Your standpoint is very negative. Therefore compounds through the valuation calcs.

I think he’s panicking because he wants to look smarter than RAH. Bored, but it’s all about their egos.

Fair play Luke, your provided your underpinning. Certainly a lot of work. Hats off.

It’s all academic though. Your valuation is as biased as you pertain RAH’s to be. It’s compounding negativity. I got lost in the first post. It’s your view though, so respect that.

Blows my mind to think people would invest in a company like Avacta for some measly return. Either mental or not invested.

Sshhhhhh the hedge will find out and scrap that entire facility. TA is here to stay. Here on this board.

Yep. That’s it. Did a better job than me.

Haha literally half a dozen tweets begging for him to unblock you.

Yet you all follow RAH on Twitter. All desperate to see his posts.

That’s the oddest thing about calling him out.

No he didn’t. It’s always about the negative. How it can fail… how it’s about keeping your powered dry… about don’t put all of your eggs in one basket…

Very easy points to make about any stock.

I would never be so arrogant as to recommend what any one spends on any stock. Their monies. But to offer advice when you GAMBLE on most stocks listed in some seminal PL75 posts, it’s down right laughable. Certainly beyond credible.

Maybe Timster.

Just interested in views that challenge RAH et al over valuations but offer no base. Neutronic hammering RAH yet follows him on Twitter? Mental.

I’m thankful you answered Wyn, fair play. Others don’t.

I don’t have a preference on your response. It’s yours, your view.

It makes absolutely no sense though. Only underpins your position as a gambler in this stock. Most investors value the stock at a higher value than when they bought it. Quite novel.

Gambling becomes an addiction. When the fun stops, stop.

Those in leverage via SB are technically gambling, yes.

Question Wyn;

What do you think we should be valued at today?

What value do believe could be achieved?

Exactly.

Wow. He’s lost it. Now pi55ing in his ‘gas tank’.

Yep. Saved. The next ramps milestone set up for his trade. Heard a vicious rumour that he’s then one behind the Eliot Wave fiasco. Understandably why it’s since failed.

I’m over the MTD thing to be honest. It’s about effectiveness anyway. Can we deliver MORE effective doses for whatever dose that may be.

Totally agree - we need to move on. For lots of reasons.

“ All science day did was provide the numbers that backed up the rns and interview from the 17th Jan”

Exactly. And provided a chunk of data for those to research and make up their own minds. God forbid.