Member Info for bdog51

Results out. Good set of results and confirms low cash burn. No likelihood of fund raise for some time it seems.

Good point Risky - AIM companies are obliged to release 'price sensitive info' as soon as possible. This is basic FSA rules.They are not permitted to hold onto this info until a time that suits them. Which does beg a lot of questions about the bundled-up nature of news in this RNS. https://www.out-law.com/en/topics/corporate/company-law-and-corporate-governance/disclosure-of-price-sensitive-information--fsa-rules/ Having said that, as a shareholder I'd rather the company doesn't face any penalties for this! I would rather that future news is released piecemeal as it occurs rather than bundled into a big release like this.

Excellent SBTX update - Dr Catherine O'Neill, CEO of SkinBioTherapeutics, commented: "This announcement demonstrates the excellent progress SkinBioTherapeutics is making at all levels - scientific, development, manufacture and commercial."

So TW is going to charge £6 per month to access share p-r-o-p-h-e-t-s from next Thursday. Is anyone signing up, I'm certainly not. His Opti tips are somewhat repetitive I find. He's been saying virtually the same thing over and over for a long, long time now.

Astonished to read some of the nonsense on here today. Why are people so focussed on revenues already. The interims only cover up to May and at that point the commercial deals are only just starting to be signed off. GoFigure is not a big deal and is down in the noise compared to the bigger deals here! This is only the beginning of the commercial phase.We've got sugars yet to come too. A lot of impatience &/or ignorance being spouted IMV. Give it a chance to get a foot into the commercial phase and then we'll see the revenues kick off! Patience folks.

Just a technicality perhaps but as far as I can tell we closed on 67.50p mid, yet the LSE chart shows 68.50p. Would be nice to see a close in the 80's but that's coming ..

My CHL shares are in my SIPP with Hargreaves. I emailed then yesterday and got this reply today - "After de-listing, your CHL shares will continue to be held in the tax-free wrapper of the SIPP. Further, if they are re-listed at any stage you will be able to trade these on NEX. "

SkinBioTherapeutics announces that, as envisaged in the Company's Admission Document dated 29 March 2017, it has agreed an eight month extension to its research contract with the University of Manchester to June 2018. This contract extension includes provision for the appointment of a second technician to the Company. This will increase the Company's ability to develop its SkinBiotix® platform. Furthermore, the Company announces that it has recently demonstrated activity of SkinBiotix® at a range of doses in human skin models, and also completed the design of two human safety trials. If successful, these trials will allow the technology to be labelled 'dermatologically tested' for its cosmetic application.

one of the big boys must surely be flipping te stock - looking thru trades over last few days .. sells each day of 150k, 100k, 100k, 100k, .. that's no PI selling. great news for those waiting on the sidelines for a low SP and commiserations to those of us (me ) who took the early bait! maybe not such a fabulously organised IPO after all? I'm not overly impressed so far but at least will get the free shares as an opti long term investor. Swings and roundabouts, sigh!

Some info from advfn's SBTX bb - Senica were big IPO investors for SBTX at 9p but may not be locked in, so could be flipping the stock for a quick profit? No idea if this is the case but it'd explain the selling at below PI opening price of 13.5p or whatever it was on IPO day. If Senica etc haven't been subjected to a lock-in period from IPO then that's a pretty poor set-up? See more on this on the advfn bb. Interested to hear if anyone knows what the lock-in rules were for this IPO.

Fund raising at 7p was at a 40% premium to the last market closing price. Looking seriously good here.

Yes that's how I read it ie 800 old shares = 200 new hence 4:1 consolidation.

Have you increased your buy-in target then, conidering your previous prediction on SBTX: 05 April: "I am waiting for 6 to 8p in the next few months." I'd be very interested to hear your rationale for this big drop down to IPO levels or lower? Especially when the 9p placing was 3x oversubscribed! It's easy to throw a low number out there with no reasoning, pretty pointless really..

Date: 11 April 2017 From ICSID site: The Secretary-General registers an application for annulment of the award filed by Churchill Mining Plc and Planet Mining Pty Ltd, and notifies the parties of the provisional stay of enforcement of the award. Annulment Status: Pending (ad hoc Committee not yet constituted).

RTO is underway as announed in Jan 17. If you read the last RNS: " the Proposed Acquisition will be completed in mid-April 2017" Hence expect news next week, probably.

Presumably if we don't win the annulment then CHL are liable for the £9M payment that ICSID awarded to ROI to cover their inflated legal costs. I truly hope it doesn't come to that as we'd be bankrupt, surely.

Disappointing to see the steady decline in SP since start of Feb. The sooner TRX can deliver some decent news, the better. Still holding in the meantime but patience needed here. Could be a really good earner this one, given enough time to bear fruit.

I was surprised to receive a prompt reply to my email to Jim Yong Kim, sent only yesterday (I didn't expect a reply at all). In my original email I pointed out concerns around the use of inadmissible evidence and thus the breach of ICSID rules. Not that it helps much but below is the reply I received, must be a standard template reply (several members of World Bank were CCed into the reply also): Dear Mr. ***********, I refer to your email of February 5, 2017 addressed to Dr. Kim, Chairman of the Administrative Council. The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) is an autonomous international organization with the function of providing facilities for conciliation and arbitration of investment disputes between Contracting States and nationals of other Contracting States. Tribunals constituted pursuant to the ICSID Convention are independent and make rulings based on their assessment of applicable fact and law. As a result, the Chairman of ICSID’s Administrative Council cannot comment on the contents of an award in any particular case. We thank you for your interest in ICSID proceedings and ask that you address any further inquiries to our attention. Kind regards, ICSID SECRETARIAT

thanks maestro, I've just emailed Jim Yong Kim in the interests of piling a bit more pressure on him. You never know, with our collective efforts it might just make him start to take notice of the inconsistencies and breach of rules in this case. Surely the "breach of ICSID rules" claim would get his attention at least?

We already have legal representation, through Clifford Chance. They continue to represent CHL in this action. Besides, why give up now when we're on the verge of challenging the award. We may well fail in the fullness of time, but it's not all over yet. I may be in a minority here but I still believe we should fight on, guns blazing. ICSID have tried to pull a fast one on us, we must fight on.. IMV