Member Info for bcl42

Eh?

Correction (or Freudian slip) 0.75p

To be honest does anyone really care if we are at 0.075p or 0.80p. We will either hit multiples of that or we will go down the pan. I am betting the former but like most remain frustrated with the pace here.

I think the number of posts on here following a LC interview speaks volumes. i.e. everyone has heard it all so many times before that it is now time to arrive/deliver rather continue to make progress. He may well just do that but it is certainly not before time.

Very relaxed and confident. I just wish the SP was well north of 0.75p to reflect some of that confidence. Pity funding wasn't mentioned, not because LC could say anything specific but his answers would still have been interesting.

than the mining licences that is for sure. We are not far away from our all time low so sooner rather than later would be good Louis.

Thanks SirG I was beginning to think I was the only one here today.

But judging by the lack of trades and posts I might be the only one thinking that.

There also must be a quick follow up to MCPP licenses telling us what we intend do with them. At some point soon there has to be a deluge of information.

We are way overdue some progress with Moz and Bots. Moz private offtake agreements were close back at the investors meeting at the beginning of the year.

Hear from you that is.

Good to here from you Shrubby. You may just be right. GL

It’s almost incredible

It’s hard to disagree with the credibility gap but his tenacity and sheer doggedness is to be admired and today’s RNS should give him some plus points on the credibility issue.

After all this time I certainly didn’t expect license granting to result in no rise in the SP. The market obviously needs a lot more convincing.

Any combination of those. Soon I think too. Our time is coming.

The 100th post

But 2.15 would be ok.

Strangely as soon as I post 2.00 I assume it couldn’t happen as it would look like insider info. (Which I obviously do not have)

2.00 would be fine.