Member Info for BarryBrownPees

Crack on ndn, I don't read your posts but I can see they're quite long so you get an A for effort.
Must go, I'm playing pairs with my boy and the duck legs won't confit themselves.

"MMs can hold a float, so the main parties to benefit would be them. And there’s very little chance they would be doing it or they’d upset their own apple-carts and go to jail"

Im not saying it's mms because I don't know, but's whoever it is, its next to impossible to prove, we don't have the organisation or the resources to prove it, neither do the regulators, so why would they chase it?
The regulators don't care because it's small fry, it's like the equivalent of pick pocketing or theft from cars, if there's no obvious evidence and nobody has been physically harmed, they won't investigate, and why would they? Misleading people by shaping a narrative isn't a crime.

This game is skewed to transfer wealth, and in life, it's nearly always the little guy who pays.

It's always the same names that come on these threads to question the credibility of this theory.
They use subtle questions to dampen down the speculation, questions that no body could truthfully and accurately answer, like somehow not knowing who the brains behind the operation or what the exact motives are nullifies the theory.
My favourite responses are "would any one actually be that stupid?" Or "do you think anything that gets posted here actually affects the sp?" Well we know it does, when we see a false leak on here and get unduly exited or panicked the share price moves. But we all know that can never really be proved.
It's very subtle gaslighting.

I don't have all the answers, but i can say with 100% certainty, wherever you find money, you'll find sharks, and they're circling to get that money.

I tweeted the author and he* blacked me.

I tweeted the author and be blocked me

Well done Andy, good find

Fair enough Brand.

https://twitter.com/onebrandondavis/status/799706372883550208?s=20

https://youtu.be/8Y-zNM5NDNI

Of course it was

Poor effort

Homeslic3, Google: in vitro

Testing it now, 3rd time lucky

Great post

This decision undermines regulation.

A placing would be better value for us vs a deal on a discount with the American government, but that's irrelivent in my opinion, the US government are handing out funding like candy.

Agreed though Tommy D, every time we get a good lift and some good sentiment we see the fund raise subtle deramp.

Thanks Matterhorn

30% is specific, especially as that estimate has been lifted, does any one know if that 30% would be 30% of the turnover, where the partner would absorb costs on their end?

Good for you Tony, much appreciated

Every time we see a big change in sentiment, we see the same names come back out of their caves, names we havnt seen in a while, the likes of Graking, ProfessorSPD and Hurtle, even Woodie likes to throw his two penn'orth in and stir the pot.

They use conspiracy theory drivel as a vehicle to reframe the discussion, to shift attention away from the possibilities and potential of this share.

Make no mistake, they have an ulterior motive.

"Seen you!"