Member Info for Bannor

It's taken me years to work out the boomtown rats song but now I get it..... I don't like Mondays either - in fact I f-ing hate them - every ones a red one so far today....

.58 & .57 trades just reported .... some are wanting out!!!

4 additional holes - one step out in Kuwait anomaly.....

http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/market-news/market-news-detail/SULA/13216834.html

Who knows - just please no after hours RNS - I hate after hours RNS's - they're usually not good....

....to break .7 :-)

Indeed...... bit of a false rise around 8.40 this morning but settled down to a sustainable uplift after that.... roll on results & let's hope they're good :-)

I expect the bid/ask to drop a little soon especially as there's just been a trade in the .65 reported - you cannot trust the colour of a reported trade on AIM in my opinion....the trend is your friend the colour is misleading - just my opinion....

It's just because the price is rising .... that's what happens when the trades are reported 15 mins after they're made & the bid/ask has alrwady been adjusted to accommodate them ....

LoL..... just waiting to see the size of the buys in the .67's before I get too hopeful.

Yummy....... 0.678 paid maybe break .7 today & profit :-)

This is slowly becoming one of my fave stocks....... now if we can get to my original buy in of 6.8p I'd be mega impressed.... but having averaged down over the years & taken part in the placing - overall not too shabby currently & not too long before I'm in profit Yay..... :-)

Hopefully we'll all do OK - certainly looks & feels more positive now than when we were leapfrogging commodities as one went cold & another looked more attractive as the SP nosedived - I'd really like to understand what the score is with all the commodities that were at the forefront of RNS's during Nick's control.

Evening GK - gotta say I'm not so sure there's an imminent takeover in the offing either hostile or otherwise, I must say also though that I have no idea what the benefit or otherwise might be of transferring the shares excepting maybe a possible tax manoeuvre. In my opinion it's too close to the first preliminary drill results with the second drill presumably not too far behind - by the time they've announced an offer & allowed time to set dates for votes etc it would be difficult to justify an offer being fair, reasonable & in shareholders interests if it doesn't reflect any drill results subsequently posted between offer & vote....I really can't see them being able to delay results or them being anything but accurate - monies no good if you're behind bars..... As far as I'm concerned they'll need to get the drill results out & factored in before making any other moves IF that is indeed their intention in any event. Been here for years & bought in initially at near 7p, averaged down some with more losses & then took a chunk in the .21 offer.... I've experienced the roundabout from iron to gold to Coltan now back to gold (& maybe the Iron will come back into play at some point) am expecting & hoping for a near complete financial recovery 1p would do it & 1.6 would make me happy.

Don't disagree with that Goheavy which is why I usually indicate the big IF. Nothing stopping an unsolicited hostile takeover bid not recommended by the BoD as well as one that might have management involvement & support - but in either event it would still need be put to a shareholder vote...

Despite the directors responsibilities any takeover bid would need to be considered by the takeover panel who also has a responsibility to ensure that a takeover bid takes into account all known facts - the drilling results from the current drill programme would be a significant factor in this assessment. Whilst I understand the concerns over an unfair offer & shafting I am satisfied that a takeover bid (IF there is one) should be balanced & reasonable, especially if the directors want to ensure it's accepted by the required majority.

& still rising..... be nice to break & hold .5

Nice - can't see volume yet though..

What makes you think that John? A Chinese wall would be necessary when there was a potential conflict of interest for PDMR(s). THhe driller here is employed by Sula.... nothing we can do to stop them seeing what's coming out the ground & whatever's coming out the ground is ours - not sure you could create an effective wall there...

Thanks GK had the grumps esterday so didn't and didn't respond well to LB. LB posted this yesterday if you want the full takeover.rules - GL ----------------- If anyone's interested it's a long read but select takeover code & practice statements tab for the full PDF http://www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk