Member Info for Bamps21

Hi Hydro
That remark I made about the ovoid size and the depth is where we should be looking I think was to Tom the Bomb.
The way an ovoid formula is calculated either the x axis or the y axis has to increase dramatically to make any effect.
If the x axis increases by 100m & y 0m then there is hardly an increase.
If both axis increase by 100m then wow!

When Tom was on about it the depth was about 900m and I was talking about 1200

That Newgen conference the talk was of an ovoid 800x 500
The top ovoid from NCM is 650x350 no mention of any increase lower down but they’re not confirming much below 1000m at the moment.
From sections and plans dimensions suggest a much larger ovoid of 920x 650.
This is why I get excited the volume potential increase (if the last size is anywhere near) is ginormous:))
The thing is it’s still open on 3 fronts to increase this ovoid and maybe joined to Havieron North.

Coupled with the increasing depths and grades it’s mind boggling:))

Hi Dh
You picked up on it then .
Yes I’m annoyed with this board it’s just not the same, the info coming is just not there anymore.
All these bankers need to go back to Barclays

Hi Philb
I didn’t expect a rerate on drill results , it’s the Jorc upgrade coming where more ounces can be added to the accounts that will have a steady increase to the sp .
People shouldn’t panic about day to day movements.
These upgrades will steadily increase our asset base.
Another 90,000m drilling this next 6 months.
Only drilling will unzip Zipa and Havieron North

Nobody has picked up on my thoughts of 86w4, I repeat it again
2115m drill length 1873m vertical depth
1450m ore depth
Yes 1450m
They are only confirming 900m work that out 50% more.
900m confirmed depth with further high grade pods in the SE crescent that’s 210m further for a SLOS mining zone this could be as much as the inferred resource.
What is this board talking about - anything bar drilling

We have drilling results every 6 weeks.
Only once every 6 weeks
I repeat once every 6 weeks.
What’s this board talking about
Absolutely nothing about the drill results
All a waste of time why do they bother issuing anything at all
Shorting, take overs, 5% , up , down? what the hells going on!

Drilling is what increases the ore size
I said drilling!

Hi Spades
I would like to think your remark
“ One thing that I have never seen mentioned here, is that 12 months ago we still officially owned 60% of the Havieron project. Now we only own 30%. ” is the real reason but 12 months we only just got confirmation that the ore body was an ovoid and the Inferred resource had just been issued.
Really we had 60% of potential now we have 30% of a reserve and it’s growing massively.

Hi Prof Q
The paste plant will be close to the batching plant, what makes you think it’s right up there.
The paste needs to be mixed with cement and pumped into the decline at depth, pipes need to be as short as possible.

Xavido
Most of it yes

Kevin
That wasn’t a stupid tweet about the FX rates at all.
The capital raise would be in £ which is growing against the $, so conversion to dollars at this time is good more dollars.
Conversion to Aus$ is the relief in Shaun’s tweet as it has been rising strongly against the $ and it fell which is why he tweeted.
Shaun had done a marvellous with the company, your anger against him is uncalled for.
He is not shorting the company, turn your anger on the ones that are shorting

Hi Lenz
The vent is at the top of the spirals and will have the Evasee unit covering it so not a hoist at that position.
The sections show 5 or 6 shafts over the crescent position
There are 2 RAR return air raise so they won’t be used for shafts
1 FAR fresh air raises is a possibility for a hoist
Possibly 2 escape raises

I would think at this stage removing more than 3m tons has not been planned for, I would expect some further means of ore removal will occur maybe in the MRE upgrade or the FS.
If there is a future shaft for hoisting I don’t think it will be in the centre, there is still something major happening around the old vent position with access declines to the ore body.
Two things maybe :- paste plant and pump down or maybe hoisting

Hi Hydro
“Flowing through into Scallywag “
I wonder if this what I was saying about the NW trend
Havieron North - Zipa - Apollo - into Scallywag

The surveys are patchy on this bit but the tail of Apollo flow into Scallywag near the fault line.

Paddy has drawn my attention to the rig shown on NCM tweet
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=di2lxQpZlX8

The vent is no longer a raised bore ground conditions must be poor.
Now going to be fully lined and grouted

Hi Scarabbeetle
It’s a new name for a target that is growing and changing size and shape.
I mentioned this target to Hydrogen over 12 months ago and in the summer the sections showed it looking like an octopus and a whale with a calf.
Take a look on Ggp results sections last summer if you don’t believe me quite funny, a whale of a fortune.
The octopus shape would be over 1m oz
Highlight for me SE deeps 86W4 probably our deepest drill so far 500m deeper than the sections shown but still in assay. The crescent could go from quoted 900 deep to 1400+

https://www.newcrest.com/sites/default/files/2021-12/211209_Newcrest%20December%202021%20Quarterly%20Report%20-%20Exploration.pdf
Page 9

Drill 86W4 finishes 500m below this section assays pending :((

The plan at 150m slice shows the purple sulphide zone expanding within the inferred resource area.

High grade pods below the 4th mining front where infill drilling has been reported .
Not much from the Eastern breccia 141W1 still pending

Drill 68W4 drill assay pending
The previous drill 68W3 is targeting the same zone as drill 61 but coming from the SE.
https://greatlandgold.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/211028-GGP-Havieron-Exploration-Update-JORC-1.pdf

Plan on page 11 is confusing
The Red intercept on the end of drill 68W3 is shown to the right of the Dyke with no intercepts higher up the drill.
Looking at the plan on page 10 this red intercept is shown in the middle of the Dyke.
What’s happening here then?
The Dyke is sloping to the SE, the actual position of the Dyke in relation to that red intercept is that it is on the right of that intercept because of the slope.
That’s why there are no intercepts higher up the drill as it’s in the Dyke.
Those plans are a generalisation of the ore body with all the drills shown on it.

68W4 is not shown but is probably targeting the same zone and infilling it.

Drill results still pending
Drill 61W1, W2, W3
This is the second time that W1 has had assay pending.
I’ve had to go back to July 2020 to find where drill61 started and finished
Starts in the NE and heads for the SE crescent about 450m deep of ore or the 3rd mining front.
W1 and W2 look as though they’re heading the same direction.
W3 looks as though it failed to reach the ore body so will have No Significant Assay

This board has been pretty poor today a lot of sniping, people should calm down, go away for a bit and stop tuning in.
On the positive note there’s so much going on behind the scenes.
Geologists are falling over themselves for more news from Havieron deeps. The actinolite breccias are causing excitement with their 2g/t, the environmental report shows these actinolites below everything else. This makes my lower ovoid average grades very conservative.
Havieron has changed from a Telfer lookalike to other mines being called Havieron lookalikes, it’s formation is unique.
Still so much to learn about this orebody another chapter in the next day or so, very exciting.
The share price is totally disconnected from reality at some point it will out perform and overtake reality.

Sorry Tom I support Hydro 100% he just wants the best for Ggp like most people here

Mr $3098 costs per ounce
You have no concept of the procedures involved with SLOS then bulk caving and then the effect on capex.
All that you have written is so far from reality , you quite obviously haven’t grasped what is going to happen.
3 years to pay back the capex
All capex for the bulk mining paid for from the SLOS operation
All capex costs are 30% Ggp
The tolling payments are a joint venture payment only 30% charge to Ggp
The first half of the SLOS operation is where the cheapest AISC will happen, the second half will involve far more backfilling with higher AISC. This crosses over the bulk caving start up with high AISC once this is done the AISC drops dramatically at the same of the SLOS operation costs dwindling.
You can’t seem to grasp the SLOS operation is going to pay for the bulk caving start up capex.
All your remarks tonight are looking very amateurish with false conclusions

Hi Hydro
How can anyone write something so blatantly incorrect and just dismiss it and then turn around other figures to twist their arguments, baffles me why anyone would want to bother.
Oh I forgot a shorter would.
Now $3,098 per ounce revenue is as you suggest another story, more likely than $3098 cost per ounce