Member Info for Bamps21

This drill reported the best drill results outside of the main ovoid.
What’s been puzzling me is the identification number 104, the latest drills are in the 150s.
Why has it taken so long to come out, it’s a long drill but it’s not that long.
Geologists have been talking about nickel being found deep but where?
104 has found a new crescent style grades in the Eastern breccia, it’s been described as a new intrusion in a NW-SE trend.
It’s taken a long time to come to light and I don’t think we know the full story of it yet only gold and copper have been reported.
My initial thoughts hearing about nickel being down deep went to the end of drill 90W1, one of our deepest, it’s about 200m to the SE of 104 intercepts but deeper.
This new high grade zone is a separate intrusion but the cemented breccia looks as though they are coming from here feeding up into the main ore body changing the crackle into cemented.
A very complex ore system.
The miner I talk to thinks the heat generated when the Dyke was formed would have concentrated more minerals around the Dyke. We are seeing this concentration with nearly every drill and now 104 has found more evidence of this.
I’m expecting more evidence of this when exploration drills test further north, I was hoping Havieron north would have it but I believe they were too far west and not quite deep enough.
The magnetic surveys show an anomaly down there and they haven’t found it yet. The alteration in that drill will give them vectoring clues in which direction to drill next. Downhole survey instruments will also give better clues.
At the moment the Dyke within the ore body is sloping downwards to the East and is not straight it’s all over the place, so where they’ve shown it on the plans is at the top of the ore, they’ve not drawn it lower down so at Havieron north it could be anywhere down below.

I see another one is posting rubbish about Newcrest bank lending
This is from last March
https://www.newcrest.com/sites/default/files/2021-03/210302_Newcrest%20renews%20its%20bank%20lending%20facilities%20-%20Market%20Release.pdf

Their bank fascilities remain undrawn.
Get your facts straight

Hi L-a
I don’t believe it has altered much , they still catching up with me :))
It’s the grade and the sulphides increasing which might make the average grades increase.
Last night looking at Telfer results from their weakening grades they hit 0.95g/t underground average so looking good for Havieron of 1g/t or over.
I worked out on 0.75g/t for 23moz, so you can see the potential to get to high 20s

Yes I think I proved to you it could happen.
1 The vertical depths need to increase.
2 The crackle grades need to increase.
3 the Eastern breccia needs to increase

Every results night these 3 items keep improving HAD104 65m@ 5.9g/t is just outstanding
That goes down to 1040m vertical of ore, so that’s not the deepest
Following that drill length that intercept finishes at 1609m then a distinct gap to 1717m where the 78m at 1.2g/t starts
There’s an assay pending on the end between 1795m to 1913.6m so that is 1314m of ore vertically, we need this 1.2g/t to continue to that level but it might fade away a bit

Drill 90W6 (I think) ended up to the SE of that 104 drill only a small intercept but was a lot deeper and on the east of the Dyke.
You can find where the Dyke is on a lot of the core logs by the distinct gap in the logs but continuation of the grades either side of it.
Try it for yourselves on HAD 5 probably the best example.
This is how I know where the Dyke is.
The Eastern breccia is starting to circle round to connect up around drill 90 and on around to a bulge in the SE crescent

Hi Sojourner
Page 12
https://greatlandgold.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/220128-GGP-Havieron-Exploration-Update-vF.pdf

It looks to me that the Dyke runs between the last 2 intercepts and not as shown on that section.
The section and the drill line are on 2 different sections.
I can’t say I’m definitely right as I’m not party to the core logs and the Dyke isn’t straight either it’s wobbling about.
The main thing to bear in mind is that the intrusions are coming from the fault that has caused the Dyke which happened later.
The high grade is following the Dyke down to the fault line.
Sloping to the east by 300m at the moment will have the effect of making the ovoid longer and it’s still sloping and going lower

Oops too far west :))

Patience I think is needed to say this, I think this will probably be achievable but not until depths increase to at least 2000m of ore.
They’re struggling to drill passed the 1400m vertical at the moment

What excited me most was the plan on page 9
https://greatlandgold.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/220128-GGP-Havieron-Exploration-Update-vF.pdf

Find the yellow ring , the calc silicate alteration,
This is what I’ve been saying for a long time my lower ovoid.
When they’re saying separate body, that’s 2 intrusions but they’re combined as one
Look at section 1, to the bottom right you can see the ore body expands to the right , this is the Eastern breccia. Over time this has been changing from crackle (yellow) to cemented (blue), that is 0.2-0.5g/t
to 1,2 and now 5g/t.
To the left of the blue area is yellow, it’s crackle at the moment but it hasn’t been drilled yet, to get to 40m oz this needs to be cemented ie 1+g/t.

Go back to section 3 the sulphide zone on the right below the MRE area , this in my podcast I was calling a blob :))
This is what they have been infilling in last nights results, that has grown again.
There’s another one of these in the Northern pod.
Both of these could contain 1moz each.

Drill 104 I need to look at this a bit in relation to 83,
I would say it’s at roughly the same level, it’s still only roughly 150m into the Eastern breccia so not that deep.
In fact there wasn’t any extremely deep holes.
86W4 is a conundrum to me , the last 500m was in assay pending, why send it to the lab and dismiss it.
Have they tested the ground lower down where the stoping infrastructure is going, not sure on that.

NOR1 I’m disappointed with that , why send it to assay.
I had questioned to a few people why slope it to the east.
Now after seeing 104 I think they were too far east.
My reasoning for this is the slope of the Dyke, where 104 hits it is over 300m east to the top of the Dyke so the high grade stuff is to the east in my opinion.

NCM realised gold price $1743 and $4.37 copper
Average AISC $588

Hi LA
To get the plan on the page the scale horizontally looks thin but that’s an illusion because the depth is so great, I’m jumping up and down seeing the size increase of those sulphides.
Far more high grade ore to pick out with stoping lower down.
Expect to see zone level 5 , 6,7 and 8 in the next mining plan, could double the life of the stoping plan

Main thing in these results are the expanding sulphides lower down see section 2 and 3 and that huge bit on section 4.
High grade in the Eastern breccia that’s colossal news.
The 3D plan shows a yellow dotted line lower down, this is what I’ve been suggesting as my lower ovoid, my calcs are coming true.
Page 37 section bottom right is the Eastern breccia shown in blue this is now cemented breccia not crackle much more mineralised, to the left is yellow it’s still shown as crackle but it’s not been drilled yet , it will change.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=jan+22+newcrest+results+live&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-gb&client=safari#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:a70b2e38,vid:ZyG0TSDryM4,st:0

Hi Dillon
I started reading LSE chat I think was in 2007 Solo oil and LGO from what I can remember
Started posting 2018 on TW board

I’m looking for a few things
That 400-500m confirm below the SE Deeps
A deep hole in the Eastern breccia
More crackle turned into cemented breccia
Havieron North connections south to Eastern breccia and north to Apollo 3(hole7)
Hole Apollo 6 connected to Zipa

Probably all too much at this stage

Hi Hopefully
Yes please :))

Just a summary of the drills pending for reference tonight

Had58CW1
From the SW through the top of the ore at the SE crescent and on through the centre to the far side.
1325.6m long or 852m horizontal length, note the blue line on the plan is shown too long it doesn’t protrude from the ore body.
Total depth is 1015m -420m if cover =595m of ore so is not deep
It may be targeting the top of the high grade pockets in the central corridor, should indicate the low grade breccia at the top.

HAD61W3
No significant assays
Started from the NE targeting the SE crescent
Didn’t get through the cover must have had a drill issue

HAD84W3
Started in the west targeting the top area of the northern pod and east side
Total depth 1135m or 715m of ore
Should indicate the limits of the calcite breccia and alteration at these levels

HAD65W3
Hole abandoned
Length 1267m
Horizontal length 575m
Looks like it was using 65W2 hole and an issue with leaving that drill run into W3

HAD65W4
Another attempt at W3
Started from the NW in either hole W1or2 and then carrying on through the centre , through the Dyke and out through the Se crescent
1534.2m long or 696m horizontal
1,344m deep or 924m of ore
At this position the Dyke should at the ore perimeter

HAD86W2
A long drill 1629.6m long or 689m horizontal
Total depth 1477m or 1057m of ore into the centre of the crescent, should indicate where the Dyke is lower down

HAD86W3
The first section of this intercept is still in assay 991m to 1331m
Depth 898 -1205m or 478-785 of ore
Horizontal 418-562
According to the pad position this drill intercept should not be in the ore body.
Confusing!

HAD86W4
A very long drill maybe our deepest
1550-2115.3m long still in assay
Vertical depth 1404-1917m
Less cover 984-1497m
Horizontal length 695-894m
Shown ending outside the ore body but the horizontal length indicates it within the orebody
This is targeting the SE deeps around 500m lower than the previously reported intercept

HAD133W6
Targeting the centre of the SE crescent vertical depth 1485 (1065m of ore)
Below the MRE zone hitting a blob/ bulge in the sulphides

HAD141W1
Targeting the Eastern breccia above the HAD141 drill

HAD146 and W1
A drill and a wedge 2 short holes targeting the northern edge of the main ore body.
Testing the top 5-600m zone

NOR1
First drill testing Havieron North
Suggested intrusive magnetic source
Drilled at 70 degrees eastwards
Total length 1248m
Vertical length 1173m
Horizontal distance 427m

ZIPO01
First drill testing Zipa on a gravity ridge approx 500m wide
Drilled at 70 degrees NE
Total length 900.8
Vertical depth 846m
Horizontal length 308m

Panorama is getting to look really interesting with Thor news today
Thor have a number of licences on the eastern border of Panorama the geology is very similar.
On today’s announcement they are showing 3 new targets containing lithium
This licence now has targets containing gold, copper, nickel,cobalt, lithium, caesium, tin and other minerals.
SD said he’s hoping to get started on Panorama this year.
Looking good

Mumbo jibberish your at it again taking my post and twisting it to suit your demented mind

I’m surprised no one picked on what I found yesterday
Panorama nickel
This is the first hint of where the nickel is after SD presentation when he mentioned it.
https://www.thormining.com/sites/thormining/media/pdf/asx-announcements/20220125-gold-exploration-update,-ragged-range-wa.pdf

Ragged Range is at the Eastern border of the far east side of the Panorama licences

The Sterling project is the south side of Ragged Range.
On both drilling plans you can see the target straddles the border and is still open.
Look at the Euro basalt in green and the Dalton suite in purple/ pink colour, this is the same geology where Ggp surveys have picked up on the west of the licences with the gold anomaly running between the 2 for over 6.5km.
Ggp have not done any surveys yet on the eastern side of the licences.

Gold on it’s is great
Gold and copper is better
Gold, nickel and cobalt fantastic

If anybody is interested in battery development I watched a good presentation from Ilika on Investor Meets yesterday.
Talks about the difference in technological advances of batteries
2024-2030 according to Bloomberg will see dramatic increase in battery demand led at the start by Lithium ion wet cells these will tail off in 2030.
Solid State batteries will gradually take over.
There are 2 types of solid state batteries, Toyota are developing Lithium ion sulphate solid state, these are cheaper and easier to produce but the ion conductivity is not great and these will be used for mass market.
Ilika are developing Lithium ion oxide batteries more difficult to manufacture therefore more expensive. These contain lithium nickel and cobalt the ion conductivity is much greater can work in extremely hot temperatures to 150C, charging is faster and holds the charge longer and longer lifespan.
Medical batteries being developed now for marketing and sales from May.
Other bigger prototypes due from 2025 for the high end car market and consumer goods.

Therefore gold with nickel and cobalt is the right combination to find for this final use
Nickel and Cobalt have risen dramatically in the last week slightly tailing off today