Member Info for bald_eagle

"Vaccine success and roll out by September."
=======================================
It would be wrong to think that a vaccine will be readily available in September. I don't know the mechanics of upscaling production of a vaccine for hundreds of millions of doses....apparently it ain't easy. Most 'sensible' people are saying the vaccine won't be ready for the general population until next year (12 months!?!).

I suppose they could give the early doses of the vaccine to people who have pre-booked cruises BUT more likely is that it will be given to key workers.

Probably in September the NHS will start preparing for the winter months with the danger of a second wave of the virus or at very least a steady but manageable(??) stream of Covid cases to add to workloads when the NHS is historically under most stress. The Nightingale hospitals will then be shown to be a good investment.

"Who would buy round numbers in shares asks Bald Eagle? Big investors my learned friend, big investors."
=====================
Another classic bit of humour from the 'Joker'.

10,000 shares, even 30,000 shares equates to £1,200 to £3,600, which is hardly in the realm of 'Big Investors'. You really do crack me up...keep up the good work.

You never put a timeline on reaching your 108p per share target...apart from April Fool's day of course!

Would the Joker like to tell us when 108p will happen?

Good luck BackinBlak, I like an honest person and you seem to talk sense. You're here for a profit (I can respect that) but still have a questioning mind.

The 'Joker' (aka bluechipbroker) is an odd ball. Seemingly touting an absurd valuation in the slightly deluded hope that such ludicrous numbers will attract 'investors'.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to crunch the numbers.

- 250 million shares (currently)
- questionable patents on their 'wonder' product MED3000 (patent pending)
- Most likely a further fundraising next year (H1) & further dilution
- a 'wonder' product with no solid idea how it works, apart from a hunch by the BOD (perhaps with one eye on their well paid jobs)
- no distribution partners or anyone to share the cost of development (at the moment)
etc etc

If FUM had a valuation of £60m that equates to 24p per share. Perfect day trading...but hardly 108p multibagger material.

I suggest taking profits where you can....there is always the chance that the 'Joker' may be correct (aliens do exist & Unicorns!!). But IMO Futura Medical has an almost unlimited ability to disappoint.

" I like to keep my holdings as round numbers, i.e. 10000, 20000, 30000, etc. "
==================================
Hilarious!! Another cracking one from the 'Joker'. Why on earth would anyone want a round number of shares?!!!

I've heard of OCD but that is ridiculous...or perhaps the aliens made him do it. A side effect of all that probing no doubt!!

So you're not joking...you were abducted by aliens and they took you into the future!

I suppose that would explain why you believe that FUM will reach 108p per share fairly soon....indeedaccording to you it should have attained that figure on 1st April 2020 (if it wasn't for that darned virus).

It makes it difficult to see where the joke ends and when you want to be taken seriously. But keep it up...I do enjoy a good laugh.

"I can’t say too much but the FUM believers end up very rich and the non believers and de rampers end up drowning their sorrows."
==================================
I have those sorts of dreams too....usually involving Raquel Welch!!

Did you manage to look at a newspaper to see what the date was during your trip to the future (when FUM share price exceeded 108p)?....did they even have newspapers that far in the future?!

Still awaiting regulatory approval for MED3000 I expect!

The Joker strikes again!

I wonder if he enjoyed the experience!?...probably!!

" don't think I'll hold out for the 108p !!"
====================================
Very sensible.

People who believe that the SP will get above 100p per share in the near future (say 3 years) probably believe in unicorns & UFO's....indeed they may have been 'probed' by unicorns & aliens for all I know.

There seem to be lots of new people coming on board the Futura ship...welcome aboard. Hopefully you have done your research & are prepared.

I'm not sure of any RNS's - mentioned by someone - that are impending that will drive the SP higher. But hopefully there are.

Ultimately I wish you all luck, because I will benefit with a higher selling price....108p per share here we come

It is bound to sort the wheat out from the chaff!!

Although Google & Facebook are likely to emerge even more dominant.

" However, the phase 3 trial excluded lots of co-morbidities, so safety the data from phase 3 will may not convince doctors to prescribe it."
=======================
RaptorF, I'm not sure what you are talking about, could you explain a little bit about the 'co-morbitiies' (whatever they are) that were missing from the P3 trial?

Strange how you pick holes in the trial data but also seem interested in investing....but I suppose scepticism doesn't mean you cannot make a profit from others peoples naivety.

Yeah...I'd offer £10, I might even go to £15.

There seems to be a difference between companies that are cutting the dividend because of pressure from the financial regulator and others because the BOD have identified a need to conserve cash. The former seem to be critical lenders to companies that are needed to keep the economy going. I'm not sure LGEN are under regulatory pressure to cut - probably not because they would have announced it before it went XD. The BOD have presumably assessed the financial pressures facing the company in a worse case scenario and seem to feel they can pay the dividend.

So the dividend seems safe UNLESS there is some unforseen impact on the business. It's hard to see how things could get any worse (in terms of the virus)....so hopefully a relaxation of the lockdown over the next couple of months should reduce the pressure on businesses & the economy can restart. I suspect there is a lot of pent up demand to provide a much needed boost.

" dreaming about £5 SP. :)"
===============================
Surely that's not referring to FUM!!!

Wow....£5 per share (or is that £5 for the entire company?). That would equate to a market cap of £1.23 BILLION (@ £5 per share).

I'm sure someone is going to want to beat that!!

It's a long time between now and 4th June. I'm not counting the dividend until it's safely in my bank account. But things are looking positive at the moment in that respect.

TirickyD, I don't really think there is much comparison between FaceBook & Google to the likes of TRMR. They are the really big fish. TRMR are small to medium in comparison.

But TRMR do have cash in th abank and can presumably weather the storm(s) ahead....perhaps even scooping up a few smaller fish who need help.

I don't see how you came to that idea. Paid!?

But I suppose it makes some people 'happy' to think that there is some massive conspiracy theory against Futura Medical. Or perhaps it really shows what sort of analysis some of the one-line posters & day traders are capable of, rather than discuss potential problems - like theItalian & FrankMu - they try to ignore people as 'paid derampers'. Would rather live in ignorant bliss I suppose.

theItalian, all very sensible stuff (IMO)...something that is generally lacking in the 'debate' on here about FUM.

However I do still believe that potential sales figures are important and will become more so in negotiations with potential commercial partners.

Anybody seeking a commercial partnership will want to know the likely amount of revenue that could be generated for a given marketing budget....this is probably quite a speculative figure but would determine what sort of a deal FUM gets.

I do agree that FUM would be in a better position when they get regulatory approval....however they also need cash to keep the lights on. So some early deal(s) arenn't out of the question. Mr Barder does seem eager to do his stuff at the negotiating table....too eager?!
Also if I remember correctly, some of the past deals were less than perfect e.g. partners who sat on their hands doing nothing, also lack of marketing budget.