Member Info for Bagpuss67

Please explain why?

I assume that the capitalisation in the Puss was an attempted insult? I'm not sure why you would want to do that.

Not sure you are correct though with what you are saying as the whole RNS is headed up DIRECTOR/PDMR SHAREHOLDING

That's two people though who are likley to be closer to the action who have taken profit/derisked.

ah.. see that now thanks

Actually I can see the documents its just the IPR judgements

Parsortix made the FT online edition in quite a decent size and prominent article

I guess it was an update on the patent hearing outcome

Morning. Sorry if I missed any posts on this but were there new filings yesterday. I had a docket bird update. Seems to be a status report. Thanks

Just out of school..

Looked to me like one deck was Samsung going on about lexography and the other more focused on chemistry principles was Nanos...

Fascinating clarity of presentation style but I guess both sides are skilled at getting the message across. How a jury makes sense of this is beyond me though unless they were selected from PhD chemists

Cash being spent relatively small. Very much doubt Samsung would approach things by buying in the market. Happy to be proved wrong though...

Morning all. Sorry I'm a bit out of touch with these. Does the Marksman resolve for these proceedings the question of the validity of the patent? Do we know how long a judgement on that will take? Thanks

Sorry can you remind us of the date of the markman hearing?

Hi. The earliest date is the end of Feb not end of March.

I have always hoped for £5

Think the latest target is 150p isn't it?

Thanks missB

Ps on the thresholds I was talking about when jupiter would diclose they have gone through 4% or are you saying they are overseas and only 5% applies. I had assumed they were uk

Good work. I haven't emailed him for a while but he is generally very helpful. Did he confirm that the placing shares are actually trading yet