Member Info for Bagpuss67

Don't agree. The formal sale process is an expedited process but these things do take time to make sure the global market for this asset is fully tested and initial proposals received and reviewed, follow on discussions take place, short list selected confidentiality formalities sorted and DD takes place. There is no undue delay in my opinion

Large unfortunately. But I hope for c50% premium from here

As long term holders know oddo sold out in June last year.... I think you have an old list there tissue.

Tissue. Where is that list from? Doesn't agree to the one on nano website?

Why do the BBs keep referring to a factory. Surely its more like a lab? Has anyone seen the Apple part of the facility?

Fredr. Yes could be a hardball play/ payback from nanoco if they are confident it matters to Apple. I but that arguement more than Apple just wanting to buy Nano's patents

Apple woulxld not have cancelled an entire project and supply chain just to acquire Nanoco. Why would they want to acquire Nanoco anyway when the chose a different path

Thanks I was thinking more about the source of (I assume nano) sending sony samples.

Thanks for that. Where did you pick it up from.

Yes clearly ish

It's not them as principal its their broking clients trading. You can see this on the face of the rns

Option for a big diluting rights issue or a more palatable placing. I had better keep some powder dry

They don't have the upper hand if LO have definately decided they won't hand over anymore money otherwise they do. I'm sure LO will be telling bidders they will continue to support

Agreed. I guess this process was either triggered by confirmation LO would not be giving them NY more money or an expression of interest at say 15p as an illustration. If RG became aware of that intrest it might account for his investment at this seemingly dark hour

These are Peel Hunt clients. But still not negative

Surely this is the old/ cancelled nano particles and Nanoco are just trying to tie up the trade mark. Presumably the heat name is something to do with the IR nature of the particles?

Crow. Which off course begs the question of the how ME was able to say that the initial phase WILL be followed by a stress testing and scale up phase. He had no certainty on this until the extension was signed? If the yanks had walked we would have been in some difficulties SP wise

The original agreement ended and although there was a good chance they would sign a new one it needed to be done. They had no contract with the Americans when they completed the last milestone. The RNS said they had completed the final milestone yet you chose to tell the board different. And now appear this morning Smug by your own admission. My beef is that you are so smug frequently.

Not the prelims the 24 Dec Milestione completion RNS.

I was concerned and you said I was wrong which at the time presumably reassured some people that this contract extension announced today was already in place

Why have you a smug grin. You were wrong about the contarct at the time of the prelims and I was correct. When they hit the final mile stone they were out of contract as I 18Bagpuss - I saw your posts on ADVFN too. I think you’ve got the wrong end of the stick. The company said after the 8 October preliminary results presentation that it is in discussion with the partner about further contracts in addition to the existing agreement so today’s RNS is completely consistent and raises no causes for concern.

Have a nice Christmas.