Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
Fleccy I’ve never said we shouldn’t protect our borders, as an eu member uk could have sent these poor people back to France & in some cases we should have.
Maybe you could think about the decades and decades where these boats we not much of a problem & then, all of a sudden a defunded border force, dropping out of international agreements without a plan and removal of legal entry options & all of a sudden it takes 5 years to get an asylum decision…….. oh wait, Whalen did that happen?
& BTW you keep making fool out of yourself about Gordon and our Gold reserves. Proper grown up analysis admits he chose the wrong time, but holding gold for periods of financial stress is a stupid thing to do & in scheme of things want much money. You get from the very worst places your lil brexity mind takes you.
& those lawyers, they are just using a legal framework that’s been in place for decades to keep a morally bankrupt government in check. The bigger question is why can’t this Brexit government operate inside the law? Like other governments before it….
Are you Trump supporter too ?… I guess you are
Fleccy’s knuckle dragging world view. Straight out of the very worst of leave campaigns propaganda.
Obviously could start with Brexit being responsible for promoting utterly unfit people into power, move along to UK stock market losing its position & all the way down to Russian propaganda favourites entering UK discourse like “establishment” “elites” etc etc etc, none of which featured as a major concern before the country was poisoned by it….
You seem to be suggesting a lawless Britain would work better, as if the loss in trust hasn’t already done enough damage to this country, already seen as operating in bad faith by many.
Gone from most trusted to almost least trusted in less than a brexit decade…..
Any ideas why stocks are suppressed?
Don’t you think it might be a way to amass vast amounts of debt / investment safely?
Don’t forget we are not talking this week or next year, to disrupt openreach they just need to doing wholesale deals at any point during openreaches payback period, circa 30 years or so.
MLH - John Malone yes TNT sports also Warner brothers, CNN, Paramount, discovery and much much more.
AKA Darth Vader on US stock exchange.
I agree with your assessment of consolidation that’s the point, this VM wholesale (I guess) will the where they all consolidate into.
Fleccy - things are moving towards my analysis of the future far more than yours.
You don’t even try to account for what competitors will do to upset you BT centric matra.
A wholesale operation from VM would be the first step of my risk analysis. Any & I mean any provider choosing to use it will confirm thoughts, Sky or similar size would be a disaster scenario. Of course it’s Comcast now, not really Sky, which I think increases the risk not reduce it
I kind of gave you the analysis days ago. The altnets remind me of the franchised cable companies in the early nineties.
They have all been consolidated into Virgin Media, so it makes sense Virgin Media will eventually consolidate altnets.
The new subsidiary is primarily for wholesale. I’ve already given you my analysis / risk this presents to our BT investment. Just need to attract some or one big openreach wholesale customer in part or in whole.
&!you need to do your homework on uk cable networks . You are all wrong on your two networks theory.
Fkeccy here you go again, desperately running through your bingo card is technical acronyms trying to convince readers of your expertise.
The bottom line is the cable industry has been offering 1gig download broadband speeds for quite some time……. So it’s nowhere near as hypocritical as you would have people believe for your argument.
If BB speeds are the game, BT have been lagging behind far too long. I think most people on this board would agree. I personally thought higher speeds over twisted pair would have been enough & BT could have sweated older networks for longer to spread the cost. In that case there is a point to competition forcing BT to abandon this strategy (G.Fast) etc
Pjoan
“BT had new competitors back in the 80s in the UK like Mercury, Kingston, NTL, Racal and Telewest to name a few.
Where are these companies now in the UK.”
Answer = Vodafone - KCOM - Virgin Media - Vodafone - Virgin Media
Get rich Q - not not at all, buying in without taking BT services is one thing.
Having a stake in the business with their services and then concluding their offering is no good, thus undermining their stake, is something completely different.
Very wise advice as always Mandy.
Just the tip of a very, very dirty ice burg, covered in betrayal and treason.
Maybe you would be able to think of reasons why a uk insurance salesman would be meeting with Russian embassy / agents ?
It gets far, far worse, this is the bit he admits, because he thinks it’s so clandestine it doesn’t matter.
It’s like a gun, with finger prints wiped off? Why would anyone innocent wipe their prints?
https://www.ft.com/content/6a49782c-6c88-11e8-852d-d8b934ff5ffa
Goodness gracious me stumpy, go google leave campaign Russian links, go search unaccounted leave campaign money, you will find plenty of serious journalism indicating meetings with known operatives, same with Conservative Party, Boris Johnson and various ex kgb members. It’s not difficult. Then search the Russian report filter out all the right wing press and propaganda sites & it’s clear.
Plainly the blame for Brexit lays squarely at the people who were impressed by grifters, paid with Russian money.
In the late 1930’ there was a MAGA movement whose sentries and congressmen read out speeches written by Hitler. History repeats
The leave propaganda read like something out of the Russian revolution, “elites” “enemies of the state “ “establishment” etc etc. you can hear the same themes from Putin today as he tries to shape a Russian narrative