RE: Charles Dickens,Alistair Cooke, the Proclaimers.......31 Aug 2019 09:10
Casa, a while back you posted this..., which given our postponement now looks rather more pertinent..., any new thoughts on the meaning?
‘....,To change tack slightly I have re-read the 30 april RNS, in the light of Milo's post and am still puzzled by the following (slightly precised)extract
" JPM to act as initial purchaser of the initial bonds on a "best efforts"(my quotes) basis ......not under any obligation to purchase bonds for which they cannot secure purchasers !(my exclamation)
Translated in to English I reckon that means that JPM have sole rights to buy bonds from SXX and sell them on , only if/when they have a guaranteed buyer at a higher price , thus causing the end-buyer to pay both the coupon and JPM's profit margin.In that scenario , I wonder who has the legal right to seek redress from SXX if it all goes belly up, JPM or the end owner?If JPM they might just own a mine(or large part of it)’