Re: CEO12 Jan 2022 15:35
The problem here, which is also common throughout the market, is plain poor management.
Mulholland has been here for years, stringing surprisingly loyal shareholders along while diluting their holdings with a series of failed ventures.
He finally managed to acquire an asset with potential and then through a succession of general lack of information plus the usual bad luck - no gas for the injections, partner going bust, grouse that have priority over drills - he somehow managed to drive the SP down from 60p on readmission to about 16p, during which time he even managed yet another placing, this time at 20p.
This news should have been released several months ago, during which time the SP would have rerated (instead of bombing) to say 50p/60p in preparation for the billion barrel plus announcement. Instead the shareholders heard not a thing.
Similarly the shareholders weren't informed that CUDA had gone into administration. All we were told was that there was a placing to try and acquire some of their assets.
The lack of communication since readmission is appalling and without doubt the reason for the appalling share price and why this won't take off now.
Look at Zephyr (previously some other name which escapes me for now) which had an appalling CEO Matthew Idioms in charge for years during which time the share price did nothing. As soon as he left the share price has risen by 10 to 15 times. UKOG are the same with a terrible CEO.
Just poor management.
AJMO.